This change ensures that a function signature always starts with an
`IdentifierNameMaybeBeforeSignature` node (renamed from
`IdentifierNameBeforeParams`), even in the case of function declarations
like `fn F -> T` that have no parameter list. As a consequence, this
ensures that we push new entries onto `pattern_block_stack` and
`full_pattern_stack` when we start processing the function signature.
Mainly because "sorting_diagnostic_consumer" is legacy, since
`SortingDiagnosticConsumer` became `SortingConsumer`. Also better
reflecting contents of these files.
Where I'm not renaming, I'm less positive about dropping "diagnostics"
from "file_diagnostics" and "null_diagnostics" (which contain both a
consumer and emitter, and "null.h" seems like poor naming), so not doing
that here. Also "diagnostic.h" contains `struct Diagnostic`, so is a
decent fit.
Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini 3 Flash
The IdTag knows the type of the Id its tagging and the type of the Id
being used as the tag. This prevents mixing up tagged and untagged ids,
and avoids having to work with untyped integers.
Adds an Untagged marker struct that's used as the tag type in IdTag when
no tag is desired.
The complexity of ConstantIds and TypeIds became a bit visible: TypeIds
are concrete ConstantIds. And ConstantIds have two different tagging
schemes, one for concrete and one for symbolic ids. And ConstantIds are
actually re-cast InstIds with the same index. The LoweredTypeStore needs
to work with tagged TypeIds, but the tags actually come from an InstId
store in ConstantValueStore. Now this is expressed in the type system by
getting the tags for TypeIds from the ConstantValueStore.
ValueStores without an TagId type parameter are now visibly untagged.
IdTag is now only default constructible when it does not have a tag,
which means ValueStore is only default constructible when the TagId is
untagged. This forces tagged value stores to be constructed correctly
with a tag at compile time, and untagged ones to be constructed without.
FixedSizeValueStore has overloads for dealing with tagged and untagged
Ids, since it can't default-construct ValueStore for tagged ids, and no
longer requires passing in default-constructed tags when there is no tag
in the ids.
This unifies the default Clang arguments between the `clang` subcommand,
the `link` subcommand, and the `ClangInvocation` built for C++ interop.
This sets the stage to integrate either pre-built or on-demand runtimes
flags for both of these. However, this PR should have very little
practical difference. The biggest functional change is wrapping the
default arguments in flags to allow unused flags so that we can build a
collection of flags viable across compile and link.
This intends to avoid proliferation of dependencies on the exact API of
`clang::ASTUnit`, and would enable us to more easily switch to a
different approach that gives us more control over the construction of
the Clang AST.
Also remove some unnecessary tracking of the `CppFile` and instead
always retrieve it from the `SemIR::File`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Previously this was kept in `//toolchain/install` so it would be near to
the code that actually defines the installation layout. However, that
creates somewhat unfortunate dependency cycles between
`//toolchain/install` and other directories. Exacerbating this, a
subsequent PR is likely to add dependencies on it from
`//toolchain/base` itself that suggests that is the correct layering.
This PR just moves the code mechanically with as few other edits as
possible.
Use the `CheckIRId` as a unique identifier for the scope of an `InstId`
- if an `InstId` is created within the scope of one `CheckIRId` it must
not be used in the scope of a different `CheckIRId`.
This is achieved without extra storage, but with false negatives for
large inputs.
When an `InstId` is created, the original index of the `Inst` is XORed
with a tag derived from the `CheckIRId` to produce the final `InstId`.
When the `InstId` is used, the expected tag is XORed with the `InstId`
to get back to the original index - if the tags don't match, the
resulting index will be corrupted, likely too large - resulting in an
out of bounds index CHECK-failure.
(the tag value is derived as such:
* take the CheckIRId
* left shift one bit (padding zero)
* left shift another bit (padding 1 - used to signify that the resulting
`InstId` has a tag combined into it)
* reverse the bits
In this way, the tag is unlikely to overlap with the index for small
test cases - making it possible to separate out the `CheckIRId` from the
index in these cases to provide more meaningful debugging/CHECK
messages, and more informative `SemIR` textual dumping that can now
include the `CheckIRId` along with the `Inst`'s index in the name of an
`inst`)
The test churn here is improved printing as tagged `InstId`s can now,
with best effort (more likely for small test cases where the `CheckIRId`
and the `Inst` index aren't at risk of overlapping from the high and low
bits), render the `CheckIRId` as part of the inst's name. Going from
`instNN` to `irMM.instNN`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Right now, the class destroy impl is incorrectly generated (first
discussed [in
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/941071822756143115/1418614787449032826)).
If we want it to be correct, deferred definition logic would need to be
added, and the declaration would need to be moved inside the `class`
scope (along with whatever generic logic that needs).
This instead switches to a blanket impl, to avoid creating latent bugs
with generating the `impl` and function body in the wrong scope. This
approach uses the same blanket impl as aggregate destruction that was
added by #6098.
The intent here is to allow progress on other parts of `Destroy`. For
example, under this model the implementation of the function body could
be done as part of lowering the specific.
This takes the debug runtime of
`toolchain/check/testdata/interop/cpp/function/arithmetic_types_bridged.carbon`
from 4.7s down to about 4s (so 15% faster overall).
There's still lots of room to improve this test which seems to be
hitting lots of pathological behaviour, but InstNamer is 30% of the
runtime, with fingerprinting's `InstFingerprinter::GetOrCompute`
consuming 10% of cycles. We reduce its impact by using a vector of
vectors instead of a Map for the cache of fingerprints. After this
change InstNamer drops below 24% of the runtime.
Also move the instruction name when giving it to `AllocateName` since it
receives std::string by value, though this doesn't show up in the
profile for the test.
Although this focused on `Destroy` support, some choices here around
`implicit_type_impls` are because copy/move will likely follow a similar
approach. I'm trying not to predict too much about how we'll structure
those, but I'm putting `Destroy` impl logic in a file that could perhaps
be shared with those. They'd likely be interested in similar things,
e.g. traversing members of types (particularly class, struct literal,
tuple literal).
At present this sets the destroy function as `no_op` which is consistent
with current logic, but has a TODO to correctly define.
Constant importing for functions changes slightly due to some issues I
was having with `GetFunctionType`. zygoloid suggested this approach to
avoid `EvalInst` logic.
Adds a flag for controlling whether to generating these impls. While
this does generation for `class`, as noted above this'll also need to be
done for tuples and struct literals, which would leave the `none.carbon`
min_prelude unable to use any types. Note if destruction *would* occur,
it'll still look up `Core.Destroy` for that and fail, but that's already
true of any test using `none.carbon`. I'm trying to use the flag to see
if we can keep `none.carbon` working mostly-consistently.
I'd tried separating out the flag to #5852, but that got a lot of
pushback over whether the behavior was appropriate. I'm hoping that the
interactions here make it clearer why the particular approach -- the
goal is not to enable advanced testing, or create some new end-user
behavior that we really support, it's just to keep no-prelude tests
functional. The main question raised there was why not just keep
generating `impl T as Core.Destroy` if `fn destroy` is present -- but I
think here it should be apparent that would require additional
complexity, as the generation of `impl T as Core.Destroy` is not
currently conditioned based on the implementation of `fn destroy`. I'd
rather add complexity to this flag only if it's enabling interesting
test functionality.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Instead of taking the complete text of the Clang diagnostic and using it
as the message portion of a Carbon diagnostic, generate the individual
pieces separately and pass them into the Carbon diagnostic
infrastructure.
* Clang's context lines are generated by running a custom "diagnostic
renderer" and tracking which lines it wants to print as context for a
given source location. When mapping from a C++ source location back to a
Carbon location, the Carbon `Loc` structure is now fully populated,
including filling in the context line and the column number.
* Clang's snippet is generated by running a custom diagnostic renderer
that is a cut-down version of the full text diagnostic renderer that
only prints a snippet. This is then attached to the Carbon diagnostic
manually as an override for the snippet we'd usually create.
We no longer repeat the file location twice on each diagnostic, and no
longer produce a bogus "in import" line for all locations coming from
clang that point arbitrarily to the first C++ import in the Carbon file.
The `[diagnostic kind]` marker is now displayed at the end of the
diagnostic message, not on a line of its own after the snippet.
This is trying to make it clearer when vectors are being indexed with
`CheckIRId`.
The only one that I still kind of want to change is the
`SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<CompilationUnit>>`, but because it's a
`unique_ptr` that's a little more complex. I may not bother.
Note, some of the changes around nuanced `SmallVector` interactions were
based on trying to copy the way `SmallVector` itself takes arguments,
like with range passing.
Stop using the clang tooling library to build an ASTUnit; that library
is set up to process clang frontend arguments, assuming that something
has already built frontend arguments from the compiler arguments. It is
also too encapsulated and doesn't let us inspect and modify the compiler
invocation before it's executed.
Instead, build the AST unit directly in two phases:
* FIrst, take a list of clang driver arguments and convert them into a
list of compiler arguments, using `clang::createInvocation`. Internally,
this uses the clang driver to build a frontend invocation, including
building system-specific include paths as needed.
* Then, directly build an ASTUnit from this compiler invocation.
I've factored this so that we can split out the `createInvocation` step,
with the intention that we may want to move it out of check and into the
carbon driver with the rest of the driver-level argument handling, and
we may want to customize some of the clang options before we invoke the
clang frontend with that set of options.
In order to make the invocation reusable, it no longer depends on the
name of the carbon file importing the C++ code. In place of synthesizing
a header file name as `<foo.carbon>.generated.cpp_imports.h`, we now
insert line marker directives into the generated header so that errors
in that header cause Clang to point a diagnostic back at the Carbon
source file itself. This results in a minor improvement in the
diagnostic output: we no longer refer to a nonexistent generated file.
But the snippet still contains text that doesn't match the source code,
so it remains imperfect.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
I've been mulling this mainly for the parameter complexity of
check/lower, but doing lex/parse for symmetry.
I'm motivated by the plan to move dumping for all of them into the
respective functions, because of discussion about llvm-verifier. That
basically would add another bool parameter (or more) to each of these.
My instinct is we're going to probably accrue a little more over time,
so I'm suggesting this as maybe adding the boundary a little simpler
and/or easier to read.
Note it may make sense to refactor a little further, e.g. maybe
Lower::Context could receive the full set of options and pick out what
it wants, but I figured creating the struct itself would be a decent
start.
I'm trying to put things into options when we can produce a reasonable
default if the user doesn't assign a value. I'm using an explicit
constructor so that values can be added without affecting every caller.
A different factoring would be to pass in everything through the param
struct, but that just felt weird when I was trying it out.
Removing `inst_namer` and `module_name` from `LowerToLLVM` params --
both of these can be inferred from `sem_ir`, and I'm not seeing a
particular reason to maintain them at the call site.
I believe we will need to eventually add the specific C++ import
information in `LocId`.
This also seems to fix the `LanguageServerDiagnosticInWrongFile` issue
(#5604).
We're still not in the state we want to be according to
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/5246#issuecomment-2784301206.
Will look into removing the location part from the `"In file included
from ..."` line.
Part of #5245.
Removes the nullptr default for safety.
Note, I think cpp support doesn't allow things like `<version>` or
inline code yet, and language-server support doesn't allow non-hermetic
files, so the best I can test is an error.
This requires:
* Making `FunctionDecl` mutable since generating code
(`HandleTopLevelDecl()`) requires a mutable declaration and since we
manually add `used` attribute to force code generation.
* Passing the file system to `Lower` since it's needed by Clang code
generation.
* Creating an internal Clang LLVM module and link it against the Carbon
LLVM module.
Demo:
```c++
// hello_world.h
extern int puts;
inline void hello_world() {
((int (*)(const char*))&puts)("hello world");
}
```
```carbon
// main.carbon
library "Main";
import Cpp library "hello_world.h";
fn Run() -> i32 {
Cpp.hello_world();
return 0;
}
```
```shell
$ bazel-bin/toolchain/carbon compile main.carbon
$ bazel-bin/toolchain/carbon link main.o --output=demo
$ ./demo
hello world
```
Based on https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/5406.
Part of #5405.
Right now we construct `tree_and_subtrees_getters` a couple different
ways, it's just not obvious because one's abstracted in `check`. But
also, when formatting IR, we'll repeatedly do the `IncludeInDumps`
string check, which felt odd to me since it only needs to be calculated
once per IR.
This also shifts `CheckIRId` selection a little earlier, and in doing so
makes `CheckParseTrees` accept a sparse `units` argument. I actually
think this is a positive: it makes `CheckIRId` a little more stable
across possible command lines, when file loading fails (which is the
only time that a file will have a `CompilationUnit` but not a
`Check::Unit`).
Trying to build on the shared issue between these, I'm adding a
`MultiUnitCache` to store the calculated arrays. For the subtree
getters, this is very minor and avoids at most one incremental array
construction (moving logic out of `CompileSubcommand::Run` might be the
bigger benefit). For `include_in_dumps`, when dumping SemIR, this is
changing a calculation run once per entity (in each IR) to be calculated
once per IR (globally), i.e. O(M*N) -> O(N).
Note this seems to be marginal for performance of file_test:
- Before: Stats over 10 runs: max = 5.3s, min = 4.7s, avg = 4.9s, dev =
0.2s
- After: Stats over 10 runs: max = 4.9s, min = 4.7s, avg = 4.8s, dev =
0.1s
I was mainly thinking about this in the context of dumping SemIR ranges.
There, the impact may actually decrease because a range won't do any
cross-IR printing. But, I'm expecting to add another layer for whether
we're printing IR for a file, and that made the `should_format_entity`
callback stick out for me.
Rules executed by bazel don't necessarily have the right environment to
find the symbolizer, which was the intent of `cc_env` setting
`LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH`. So far, this has kind of been a case-by-case
fix, but every so often I'm trying to debug a crash in a test that
doesn't provide it. Rather continuing down this route, instead add
drop-in wrappers for cc rules so that it's hard to forget.
Note `bazel/cc_rules` is intended to mirror `bazel/carbon_rules` and
`bazel/cc_toolchains`, rather than `@rules_cc`.
AFAICT there isn't a great way to add this as a default for the `bazel
run` environment. It's not typically going to be set on its own,
forwarding `$PATH` would be too broad, and the [action
`env_sets`](https://bazel.build/docs/cc-toolchain-config-reference#using-action-config)
I think are not quite what we need (I think those don't include output
execution, only compilation).
Given the namespacing of `Diagnostics` in #5173, now we can use
`DiagnosticEmitter` for phase-specific emitters. This is consistent with
how we do `Context`, and also check had started this with
`DiagnosticBuilder` in anticipation of the namespacing.
Also renames `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder` to `Emitter::Builder` for
consistency with other `Diagnostics` entities.
In check, I'm still splitting `DiagnosticEmitterBase` and
`DiagnosticEmitter` just to keep the emitter definition separate from
the context.
Also cleans up some incorrect check diagnostic emitter dependencies in
lower.
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
Currently file tests for LSP must provide carbon source code as an
escaped string within notify params, i.e.
```
[[@LSP-NOTIFY:textDocument/didOpen:
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:/class.carbon",
"languageId": "carbon",
"text": "class A {\n fn F();\n fn G() {}\n}\n"
}
]]
```
This works fine for simple, single line files but gets annoying when
working with more complicated files which are necessary when testing
more complicated features e.g. goto-definition
```
--- class.carbon
class A {
fn F();
fn G() {}
}
--- STDIN
[[@LSP-NOTIFY:textDocument/didOpen:
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:/class.carbon",
"languageId": "carbon",
"text": "AUTOFILL"
}
]]
```
This PR extends file_test_base to be able to parse the notify/call
params and inject files from the test_file's splits into the JSON input.
I purposely avoid using the clangd types and manually parse the
llvm::json::Value here to avoid introducing a depdendency on clangd to
the generic file_test_base, but happy to change if we think that is
fine. Also happy to accept other suggestions on alternative methods to
achieve same result.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
The language server is now able to subscribe to and apply incremental
changes to the document. Source code is assumed to be utf-8. It does not
currently handle utf-16 code points.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Without this, diagnostics will linger after closing a file.
This refactors towards a pattern of putting outgoing calls as methods on
`Context`. I'm mixed on this, mainly thinking it's an improvement on
using `outgoing` directly (because it shares the name and structure),
might want to move it to a side-class later that is _only_ LSP wrappers.
I could also make inheritance private on OutgoingMessages and these
kinds of methods public there, but I'm hesitant to adopt that approach
versus a type separation.
This PR updates the HandleDocumentSymbol function to build a tree of
symbols, rather than a flat list. Symbols found while traversing another
symbols body are added as a child.
Adds a simple test showing functions within nested class.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
Also makes the style guide explicitly comment on void, but this was the
intent IIRC because it matches Carbon's `-> ()` (and "always" versus
"except for void", which we definitely went back and forth on).
Includes adjusting function pointers, which I definitely forget this
syntax works sometimes.
Excludes utils/tree_sitter/src/scanner.c because it claims to be C, but
really we should probably fix that to be cpp.
This PR updates the construction of clang::clangd::DocumentSymbol to
produce "range" and "selectionRange" properties that match the
[textDocument/documentSymbol](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#textDocument_documentSymbol)
spec.
"selectionRange" is constructed by finding start and end position of the
symbols identifier.
"range" property is constructed by finding the left most and right most
token of the AST, the code makes an assumption that left most token is
always the first node in postorder traversal from that node, and the
right most is the node itself. AFAIK this is true for most of the
grammar other than infix operators. For symbols with a body, the right
most token is the open bracket, so we extend the range to its matching
closing bracket.
This PR adds a new command to the Carbon VSCode extension "carbon:
Restart language server" which acts similar to clangd / bazel
extensions. While not useful during regular working of the extension
this helps when LSP either crashes or the toolchain is updated.
In order to support graceful restart, I needed to add a Call handler for
"shutdown" which is noop for now. Lsp clients always call shutdown
before sending exit.
---------
Co-authored-by: jonmeow <jperkins@google.com>
Add caching of parsed documents, and testing of the textDocument
handlers. This is based on #4896, which splits out some of the
boilerplate to calls.
Note, this caches the entire parse state because we'll want to try to
emit diagnostics when we see the update, without waiting. It may be
helpful to do that asynchronously, but we don't want to wait for another
call (such as documentSymbol). Really, we'll probably want to also add
check for diagnostics, at least.
Adds @LSP-CALL and refactors LSP keyword handling to implicitly handle a
little more of the LSP structure. This is coming out of textDocument
call handling, where this at least reduces some boilerplate of
`"params": {...}`.
Not sure if I mixed up a merge somewhere, but this is what
`parse_error.carbon` was supposed to test. Note
`unexpected_reply.carbon` was basically doing the same test, with a
minor issue of `change` vs `result` to get better output.
This switches most error printing to use diagnostics instead of direct
stream writes, even when not a specific file diagnostic. I'm allowing
empty filenames for this use-case.
This allows a little more specific testing to validate coverage of
output using the diagnostic coverage test. I'm adding a few tests to
cover things that weren't previously tested.
Separately, this also forces a little more standardization in format...
considering how changes like #4568 show effort being spent to _mirror_
diagnostic style, my thought is now to just use diagnostic code where
possible.
Note this also allows incrementally better testing of the language
server; I'm changing the crash fix from #4847 in favor of diagnostic
testing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
The language server needs stdin, and for tests we should be passing it
around. My intent is to pass in a faux stdin to Driver for language
server tests.
As long as I'm adding a new parameter, I was looking at also changing
the way streams are passed in to Driver for style (pointers since
they're held past construction lifetime). Since these are all stored in
DriverEnv, I thought it might be a net improvement to use the struct
directly, getting more explicit parameter names and also removing the
need for `SetFuzzing`.
I'm trying here to avoid functional changes, but there are a couple
additional fixes like removing an obsolete `find_insensitive` and
refactoring how `ValidateOptions` handles errors (because it reduces the
number of spots that operate on error_stream).
This adds a RawStringOstream. Versus TestRawOstream, which is
consolidated over to RawStringOstream, it uses a string for storage
instead of a vector, mainly to support move-to-string semantics. Versus
llvm::raw_string_ostream, it owns the string and supports pwrite (which
is needed for driver and its fd_ostream compatibility requirement).
This converts most uses of llvm::raw_string_ostream, leaving behind a
few in InstNamer that explicitly cannot own the string, such as:
```
llvm::raw_string_ostream(name)
<< "_" << tree.tokens().GetColumnNumber(token);
```
I have this as its own library so that it can use CHECK.
Yes this doesn't save much code, but it's code we repeatedly write.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This change splits `NodeKind::IdentifierName` into separate node kinds
depending on whether the identifier is followed by parameters, and
similarly splits `NameQualifier` based on whether the qualifier has
parameters. This enables us to only push a pattern block when it's
actually needed, rather than "defensively" pushing one when it might be
needed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
The Function.h include was simply unused, I was partly dropping the bits
that would've depended on it. Protocol.h is used, but it should really
be included from handle.h.
I'm trying to make the LSP look more like the rest of the toolchain. I'm
trying to separate the handlers from the transport layer, and remove the
multiple inheritance aspect. Also fixing some style issues, switching to
`Map`, and removing an unnecessary copt.
I'm using `Context` for the central object for consistency with other
portions of the toolchain. In order to get the `handle_*` files working,
I'm using LLVM's registry class. It has a quirk that I can't register
two registries in the same cpp file, so there are two one-line cpp
files.
In order to help show the delta (or lack thereof) for actual
implementation, I've copied server.cpp over handle_* and undone that in
two commits. See the third and fourth commits on the PR history for
that.
Disables three new warnings because they lean more towards style
conflicts than fixes. I've brought these up on #style.
Other than that, mostly fixing basic issues, and things that
clang-tidy-20 seems to fire where clang-tiday-16 didn't. One particular
curious case is `llvm::StringLiteral::data()` uses, which are flagged as
not strictly null-terminated; I'm switching to `const char*` in those
spots which matches `llvm::formatv`'s format argument, but feels worse.
I'm removing `run_clang_tidy.py` here because I'm observing it give
fewer warnings than `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k
//toolchain/...`. The latter matches how we enforce in GitHub actions
(and also caches results, and suppresses output for files that have no
issues), so I'm dropping the bespoke script.
This is in anticipation of making the integer value store be customized
heavily. I'd like to extract it from the common code when doing that, so
first disentangling them here without any intended change in
functionality or behavior to enable that.
I've tried to update `#include`s to be as minimal as I can and added a
few missing includes spotted in the process.
I've split the test for value store to include what was easy focused on
just the value store templates rather than the unified shared value
stores.
This might surface some opportunities for adding more tests, but for
this PR, just doing the minimal restructuring.
Removes the separate language server binary; I'm not sure we need to
provide it. Instead, `carbon language-server` is added as a subcommand.
Moves //language_server to //toolchain/language_server. Splits into a
trivial language_server.h, and a substantive server.h. I wasn't sure
about a better name, but wanted the split similar to check/check.h,
lex/lex.h, etc. At the same time, the class is probably going to be a
little big so not a good fit to through into just a cpp file.
This fixes some style issues with the language server class, but
generally I'm trying to not address things here in order to keep it
simpler.
Geoff Romer
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana Jansens
Chandler Carruth
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins
David BlaikieandRichard Smith
Boaz Brickner
Thomas Köppe
DavidLoftusandJon Ross-Perkins
josh11bandJosh L