This shouldn't change any functionality, but simplifies (significantly)
the logic in the installed toolchain, and also provides a better
conceptual balance between these.
I've tried to minimize the changes beyond a pure refactoring, but it was
a bit tricky to get everything working so some things have been mixed
in...
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
This reverts commit 4babfdbf22.
This was a stacked PR that was merged by accident, losing the commit and
description of the base change. Reverting and will re-land
independently.
Without this, basic `bazel test //...` style wildcards would build
a bunch of extra configurations because of gaps excluding things. With
this, the action count of a normal build should be much more reasonable.
The switch from `target_compatible_with` to tagging is based on looking
at what ends up being most idiomatic and easiest -- trying to articulate
the complex and convoluted compatible with restrictions that would avoid
extraneous build configurations was really painful and this seems much
simpler and easier to deploy in a systematic way.
While here, also change the name of a rule that confused me to no end
while debugging this -- the rule that installs a `.bzl` file that
happens to be spelled `carbon_runtimes` is very different from all of
the other "installed carbon runtimes" kind of things in the tree. Adding
the file extension helps make that (much) more obvious.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
This takes the bootstrap support that was added and makes it available
under convenient user-facing flags for while we're doing development.
For example, to build a bootstrap compiler and use it to build and run
the tests under `//common/...` you can now use:
```
bazel test --//:bootstrap_stage=1 --//:bootstrap_exec_config=true //common/...
```
This will use the stage1 bootstrap compiler, and it will build that
compiler in the exec config (so it is optimized and the above even works
when cross-building with Bazel).
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
Noticed this when testing the Carbon toolchain with a more complex
environment, don't have any way to observe this at the moment in Bazel
though.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
The runtimes and bootstrap Bazel logic was previously built around
defining custom Bazel platforms constrained with `constraint_settings`.
The use of platforms added significant complexity, including the need to
"save" and "restore" the original platform, and other complexity
stemming from changing the platform as a whole.
This PR switches to use the simpler tool of build settings, and
`target_settings` on the toolchain rather than platform compatibility.
This remove the entire need to save and restore the platform, and also
generally simplifies things.
This PR also fixes some bugs in the bootstrap that were hidden by the
use of platforms, such as the need to carefully manage the different
inputs to the runtimes build so that generated inputs pick up the
correct exec configuration -- the exec transition happened to do this
"automatically", but it seems better to handle explicitly. And it cleans
up an extraneous copy of `carbon_runtimes.bzl` that snuck in somehow.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
This also switches to a more Bazel-based install layout, skipping the
FHS-based synthetic layout. The FHS-based layout is still reconstructed
explicitly when building an installable tar-ball.
The biggest change is to configure the just-built install as a Bazel
toolchain, including allowing it to build its own runtime libraries as
native Bazel libraries. This removes the need for a monolithic runtimes
build, all of that code logic is removed.
This should also pave the way to using the just-built toolchain for
doing a full 3-stage bootstrap. Building the 2nd stage is included here
as it was a particularly effective way to test that the Bazel
integration was fully working. Adding a 3rd-stage check for stability is
future work, but should be pretty easy.
There is a down-side: this uses the busybox to do the runtimes
compilation, which means they will be re-built after ~any change to
Carbon. However, the integration with Bazel should largely pay for this,
and we can continue to factor the tests away from depending on built
runtimes in most cases.
Now that we're building and testing the runtimes more directly, this
surfaced a problem with the layout of runtimes on macOS that is fixed
here. All of the Darwin OSes use a custom layout for their resource
directory compared to other targets. We now model this in both the C++
built runtimes and the Bazel built runtimes.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
This shifts the Bazel toolchain configuration of our installation to
build all of the Clang runtimes Carbon uses on-demand natively in Bazel.
We export the information about how to build into a generated Starlark
file, and emit BUILD files and Starlark logic into the installation to
orchestrate the build.
This requires some complex management of Bazel toolchains -- we need to
first set-up a "runtimes toolchain" that doesn't have runtimes of its
own, but can be used to _build_ runtimes. Then we build the runtimes
using that toolchain, and assemble them into the standard layout for a
Carbon runtimes tree. Finally we configure the _actual_ toolchain with
this built tree.
Currently, this is only setup for the installed toolchain, but I plan to
factor this runtimes build into one that can be used directly as well to
break up the monolithic runtimes build step into Bazel-integrated build
of the runtimes. This will also serve as the foundation for adding
bootstrapping support directly to our Bazel build.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
This let's you point Bazel at an installed toolchain or download one of
our release archives. When you do, it will configure itself as a C++
Bazel toolchain. This toolchain works reasonably well, but doesn't cache
the C++ runtimes, and so linking is inefficient. The next step will be
to pivot the runtimes from the implicitly on-demand (which can't cache
when using a sandboxed build system like Bazel) to _explicit_ on-demand
runtimes directly with Bazel support.
I've included an example Bazel project that uses this and provides a
bunch of documentation and an example script that should let folks try
this out easily.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
Chandler Carruth
