This is reducing ValueStore inference of types from `using`, and removes
`using ValueType = ...` from affected id types.
I'm adding a number of `using FooStore = ValueStore<FooId, Foo>` because
I think it's a little repetitive otherwise; often 4 cases where I'm
doing this: getter, const getter, member, and getter on `Context`. Note
we also have a number of `-> decltype(auto)` that were added I think
mainly to avoid repeating the type, but I'm not sure whether there'll be
agreement on replacing those and so am not changing them here.
I'm placing these aliases with the value type in general, because I
think it's probably easier to view that way. An alternative would be to
put all the types on `File`, but:
- That would be inconsistent with things like `InstStore`, which are
very `ValueStore`-adjacent and put with their value type.
- `File` would have a _lot_ of using's, and the accessors are already
noisy -- I think it would just make the file harder to skim.
Note this is the heart of what I'd brought up [on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1388199282250613019).
This PR still leaves CanonicalValueStore and BlockValueStore as things
to also add parameters to, but I thought it best to try breaking the set
of changes apart by type. Both of those rely on ValueStore, so
ValueStore needs to change first.
`AddDefaultValue` doesn't quite capture the intended semantics; it
should typically be replaced with an actual value when dealing with
control flows. Trying to indicate the "assign later" with
`AddPlaceholder`, mirroring `AddPlaceholderInst`.
Shifting the `protected` functionality on `BlockValueStore` so that it's
not providing functions just for `InstBlockStore` to use. Also hoping
that seeing the comments next to the function name makes them easier to
understand, whereas `using` buries that a little.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
- Rename TypedInstArgsInfo references to InstLikeTypeInfo. The type was
renamed in 07efa026de.
- Update and correct the link to search for ValueStore (and similar) in
the Context class. We must avoid the google-doc-style checks rewriting
`repo:` to `repository:` in the URL.
- Mention the existance of many types of Store collections now.
- Remove pre-C++20 idioms in Field detection. Correct the concept based
idioms to work.
- Fix code indenting consistency.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana JansensandRichard Smith
Geoff Romer
