Commit Graph
15 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Dana Jansens d6be20641c Use earlier require decls inside a named constraint to provide witnesses for Self (#6915)
Performing a lookup against `Self` inside the definition of the named
constraint leads to cycles, as described in the document [Self
contradictions in Named
Constraints](https://docs.google.com/document/d/17rn2XmME8o2MM4OJqatSVuMa1iYZ1PAgcNrf0PXR9Q4/edit?tab=t.0).
To prevent those cycles, this change introduces a large refactoring of
impl lookup.

The impl lookup done inside eval is reduced to only performing
monomorphization. That is it:
- Only looks for an provides final witnesses.
- Is not allowed to identify the facet type of the query self.
- Returns either a final witness or None (or an error)

The paths for finding non-final witnesses are now done outside of eval,
directly in the initial `LookupImplWitness()` function. If no final
witness it found through eval, the resulting non-final
`LookupImplWitness` instruction witness is returned. It does not produce
cycles to identify the facet type of query self outside of eval, since
that does not result in repeating the identification when resolving
specifics of the named constraint or require decl.

Move the ArrayStack for Context::require_impls_stack into a new class
which tracks a NamedConstraintId (or InterfaceId) for each frame of
RequireImplsIds, so that in type completion we always can find the
correct frame for a given named constraint which is still being defined,
in order to find the RequireImplsIds in the in-progress definition.
2026-03-26 15:26:56 +00:00
Dana Jansens 917a6ea971 Add an interface-with-self generic to each interface and same for constraints (#6667)
Currently each interface has a `Self` facet internally that becomes a
binding to every entity inside the interface: associated constants,
functions, and require decls. Each of these has to be independently
generic as a result. This makes is challenging in extended name lookup
to move into an extended scope of an interface, as we have a specific
for the interface, but the names within require a different specific
that includes a `Self` facet value.

We generalize this relationship by adding a second generic to Interface,
called `generic_with_self`. When we want to work with entities inside
the interface, we move from the interface-without-specific to the
interface-with-self specific by adding a Self to the specific. This is
done independently of any particular entity inside the Interface, as
those entities are now all members of the interface-with-self generic.

Associated constants no longer need a generic of their own, as they do
not have separate generic bindings. Functions retain a generic, but if
the function has no generic arguments, it will have no bindings of its
own now.

Require decls retain a generic so that their specific can be
instantiated separately from the interface. Requiring the interface to
be complete does not require the types in a require decl to be complete
unless it is modified by `extend`. So we allow them to be completed
later by keeping them in a separate generic.

Named constraints look like interfaces and gain the additional inner
generic-with-self, with the same relationship to require decls.

This removes the need for name lookup to perform Substitution of a Self
facet into the extended scope instruction. Instead, the
`SpecificConstant` instruction inserted by a `require` decl is part of
the interface-with-self generic. When looking through a FacetType for
extended scopes, for each interface, we push the scope with the specific
for the interface-with-self. Then the constant value of the
`SpecificConstant` is correctly modified by the provided self
automatically through applying that specific.
2026-02-19 16:24:07 +00:00
Dana JansensandJon Ross-Perkins ff0cea55f6 Add require decls to Interface and NamedConstraint (#6321)
They are not used for impl lookup or verifying anything yet, but now
they appear in the textual semir.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-11-11 16:36:15 +00:00
Dana Jansens 81e55bed8a Generate a RequireDecl instruction for require declarations (#6318)
The `RequireDecl` instruction points, via a `RequireImplsId` to a
`RequireImpls` structure in a `ValueStore`. That structure holds the
self-type and facet type, as well as the generic id and parent scope.
`RequireImpls` is always a generic since it only appears in an
`interface` or `constraint`, which both have a generic parameter `Self`
applied to all their members.

The `RequireDecl` instruction evaluates to itself, but drops the
decl_block_id since the instructions within the `require` declaration
are not required in the canonical value which is only used for import.
And import will want to import the `RequireImpls` structure along with
the `Interface` or `NamedConstraint` structure it is in, rather than
recreate it from the decl's instructions. This also avoids repeating all
the instructions within the `require` decl in the textual semir's
constants block.

Adding the `RequireImpls` to the `Interface` or `NamedConstraint`
structure is not yet done, so they are not available for impl lookup or
import yet.
2025-11-11 14:16:09 +00:00
Dana Jansens bf72c43b6b Set the completed flag in NamedConstraint after the defn is complete (#6304)
A named constraint can not be
[identified](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/656150593c1e3fc2b6ccd83c7256a61e4bd04030/proposals/p5168.md#proposed-rules)
until its definition is complete, so this flag will be used to determine
if the named constraint is ready to be identified.
2025-10-31 20:21:51 +00:00
Dana Jansens f272198ce5 Don't elide Self when dumping the interface/constraint (#6297)
We give `Self` in an interface/constraint a location so it's not elided
when trying to dump the interface/constraint. We use the location of the
start of the definition, which is the scope for which the `Self` is
constructed and is available in.
2025-10-30 20:47:16 +00:00
Dana Jansens 22580a47d3 Initial support for empty named constraints (#6245)
Type check named constraint decls and definitions. We don't correctly
error if you put a `fn` inside them. There is no support for `require`
or `alias` yet, so there's nothing useful you can do with them yet.

We have attempted to share code between `interface` and `constraint` as
they are quite similar. First by splitting out some of
handle_interface.cpp to a separate file. Second by sharing some code
paths when you want a facet type from either one, as they both turn into
a facet type.
2025-10-22 18:26:32 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 99696b9812 Rename check handlers to HandleParseNode overloads. (#4121)
This is for consistency with #4120. Similar to that, we can use
overloads on the typed NodeId rather than individually named handlers.
There isn't the same caller benefit here though, since the calls from
check.cpp are already boilerplate.
2024-07-12 22:38:06 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 8c64f0bfdd Add -Wmissing-prototypes and fix issues it finds. (#4019)
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.

Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.

One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.

I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138

I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~ 
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
2024-06-04 20:04:45 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins f9ce0b194d Defer parsing of method bodies until the end of a suitable enclosing scope. (#3832)
In parse, form a list of methods that are defined inline, tracking where
they start, where they end, and which other inline methods are nested
within them.

In check, when we reach an inline method body, skip it and add it to a
worklist to be processed later. We also track when we reach the start
and end of a context in which inline method bodies are deferred, so that
we know when to replay the bodies.

When suspending a function definition to be processed later, the
`DeclNameStack` entry is moved to separate storage, including popping
the corresponding scopes from the scope stack and removing the
corresponding lexical names from lexical lookup. Later, when we return
to the function and parse its definition, the `DeclNameStack` entry is
restored. The same is done when we reach the end of a nested context
that can have inline methods, so that we can reenter the nested scope
before processing its members.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-04-01 18:25:27 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 86a7c9ff45 Rename parse_node -> node_id (#3760)
This was previously discussed at
https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1209975051588210729.
I'm initiating this mainly because we typically use "id" suffixes to
indicate an `IdBase` being passed around and the non-id suffix of
`parse_node` suggests at it carrying more data than it actually does.
There used to be more reason for avoiding `node_id` because
`SemIR::InstId` used to be named `NodeId`, but that's no longer
necessary. As a consequence, I'd like to rename `parse_node` to more
precisely reflect its type.

In full, this is doing:

```
parse_node_kind -> node_kind
parse_node -> node_id
ParseNodeCategory -> NodeCategory
ParseNodeKind -> NodeKind
ParseNode -> NodeId
```

This is primarily in check and sem_ir, but with some `parse_node_kind`
references in parse too.

Pluralization is consistent with name forms on both sides, so that
wasn't part of my replacements.
2024-03-09 00:21:29 +00:00
josh11bandChandler Carruth 48c986f52d Start using typed parse node ids in the check stage (#3547)
Goal is to increase type safety, though more work needs to be done (see
added TODOs).

Note that, after this change, check handlers corresponding to deleted
parse node kinds will no longer compile.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2023-12-29 01:28:09 +00:00
Richard Smith 332a368cee Rename Parse::Node -> Parse::NodeId. (#3432)
As discussed [on
discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1178878128714678282)
and today's toolchain discussion.
2023-11-29 18:53:12 +00:00
josh11b 5020fdb3be Use abbreviation "decl" instead of "declaration" (#3382)
Part of switching to the [abbreviations we've decided to
use](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RRYMm42osyqhI2LyjrjockYCutQ5dOf8Abu50kTrkX0/edit?resourcekey=0-kHyqOESbOHmzZphUbtLrTw#heading=h.pph7i5m5un7q).

I will rename files in a follow-up PR.
2023-11-10 10:43:25 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 1c748c0f14 Split semantics into check and sem_ir directories (#3176)
Continuing along with #3070. Note this is just a file rename, with BUILD
edits; every file previously in semantics/ should show as moved (except
maybe BUILDs, which split).
2023-08-31 19:54:32 +00:00