With private modifiers, we'll want to start checking modifiers later,
e.g. after a name conflict is detected (and potentially merged). I think
we've agreed to be more explicit about whether the modifier functions
are manipulating state, versus trying to keep the state on the stack a
little longer (moving Pop to the end of these functions).
Removing FileScope from the stack and renaming it to DeclIntroducerStack
to better reflect the usage and behavior. The FileScope mostly reflects
an approach that wasn't ultimately adopted.
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.
Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.
One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.
I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138
I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
Following up on discussion from #3948, doing a general rename of
"enclosing scope" to "parent scope" (and "enclosing scopes" to "ancestor
scopes"). The intent is to improve understandability and collide less
with C++ terminology for "enclosing scope". Note this changes most uses
of "enclosing", but leaves behind a few like "enclosing function" and
"enclosing block".
Note this does create some "parent class" mentions for "adapt" and "var"
(the class they're within), which is maybe unfortunate, but we'd
probably say "base class" if we meant inheritance so perhaps that's
okay. Along the same lines, these are the only `parent_class` uses I see
now, and we do have a few `base_class`.
Trying to conform with #4009. Changes SemIR::LocIdAndInst construction
to root out struct init cases with AddInst and related functions. I'm
using templating of AddInst functions in order to avoid `AddInst(loc_id,
InstName{...})` and instead have `AddInst<InstName>(loc_id, {...})` with
I think similar readability results. There are a couple cases where inst
construction is templated and so designated initializers couldn't be
used, so this may be better for those in particular due to the extra
type enforcement.
This probably doesn't clean up every last case, but I was trying to get
the bulk at once without bleeding over into less related changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This is primarily to avoid the use of `!!` in code, trying not to create
too much code as a result (obviously still a net increase). Also
refactoring to its own file to make the enum easier to find.
Note, NodeCategory does similar, I might propose similar there if
everyone's good with the API. However, that's just two, so creating
something like enum_base felt like too much.
I think the new name is more consistent for how `enclosing_scope_id` is
used relative to `name_id` (even removing the clarifying note on
`enclosing_scope_id_for_new_inst`). Suggesting `initial_scope_index` as
a replacing for the old `enclosing_scope`, hoping it's a little clearer.
I'm replacing `target_scope_id` uses in modifier logic because they
seemed to be based on the NameContext use.
In parse, form a list of methods that are defined inline, tracking where
they start, where they end, and which other inline methods are nested
within them.
In check, when we reach an inline method body, skip it and add it to a
worklist to be processed later. We also track when we reach the start
and end of a context in which inline method bodies are deferred, so that
we know when to replay the bodies.
When suspending a function definition to be processed later, the
`DeclNameStack` entry is moved to separate storage, including popping
the corresponding scopes from the scope stack and removing the
corresponding lexical names from lexical lookup. Later, when we return
to the function and parse its definition, the `DeclNameStack` entry is
restored. The same is done when we reach the end of a nested context
that can have inline methods, so that we can reenter the nested scope
before processing its members.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Per #3714, some of the details here are not yet settled. In particular,
we might want `Self` to come into scope at the start of the definition,
not at the `as` keyword. However, this change allows us to accept the
uncontroversial examples.
This was previously discussed at
https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1209975051588210729.
I'm initiating this mainly because we typically use "id" suffixes to
indicate an `IdBase` being passed around and the non-id suffix of
`parse_node` suggests at it carrying more data than it actually does.
There used to be more reason for avoiding `node_id` because
`SemIR::InstId` used to be named `NodeId`, but that's no longer
necessary. As a consequence, I'd like to rename `parse_node` to more
precisely reflect its type.
In full, this is doing:
```
parse_node_kind -> node_kind
parse_node -> node_id
ParseNodeCategory -> NodeCategory
ParseNodeKind -> NodeKind
ParseNode -> NodeId
```
This is primarily in check and sem_ir, but with some `parse_node_kind`
references in parse too.
Pluralization is consistent with name forms on both sides, so that
wasn't part of my replacements.
This doesn't add full support. I'm separating it out to make the effects
of the modifier changes clearer for review. I'm restructuring a little
with the expectation that we'll have some more categories of modifier
keywords in the future (similar to `extern`, these may not be in a "set"
such as access), and thus easily scaling up to a few more would be
useful.
Add an instruction to hold the witness table, along with a corresponding
type to keep things simpler. Add `check/impl.{h,cpp}` to house the new
logic. No checking of impls against interfaces is performed yet.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Interface support is pretty skeletal so this may need additions later,
but I think it's still worthwhile to fill in the necessary bits now.
With this change, the expectation is then that everything we have right
now which _can_ be imported, is supported for import (at least for the
"current package, no overlap" case).
To make the implementation simpler, make `PopWithParseNodeIf` return
`pair<NodeId, optional<value>>` rather than `optional<pair<NodeId,
value>>`. While wrapping the whole result in `optional` seems more
principled, it's significantly harder to work with.
Note we may also want to do this with NameId, maybe some other things,
but the TypeId use is pretty broad and repetitive -- I thought I'd start
with it first.
They don't have names, but using the DeclNameStack anyway keeps our
behavior more consistent, and keeps track of the enclosing name scope
and the prior state of the scope stack for us.
Depends on #3683.
Collect the contents of an `impl` into a scope, and start doing very
basic checking for `impl` declarations and definitions.
This change adds two new `Id` types to the set of type that `NodeStack`
supports -- `ImplId` and `NameScopeId`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Use two different nodes for "<type> followed by `as`" and "<type>
omitted before `as`, use `self`", so it is easier to determine which
case. Later the second case will push the type id for `self` onto the
node stack, making the two paths more similar.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Consume the components of the `impl` declaration, and set up scopes for
the child elements. We don't yet build a representation for the impl
itself.
Also, add an interface type value. This is necessary so that we have a
value for the expression on the right-hand side of `as` in an `impl`.
Goal is to increase type safety, though more work needs to be done (see
added TODOs).
Note that, after this change, check handlers corresponding to deleted
parse node kinds will no longer compile.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Jon Ross-Perkins
Chandler Carruth
josh11bandJon Ross-Perkins