Also, when constructing the diff link, make sure we pick a commit that's
on the current PR's branch as the starting point. github wasn't able to
properly process the links we were creating before, if the last
dependency PR had commits that weren't on the current PR.
Fix a couple of tests that were broken by a prior change.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
Use A..HEAD, where A is the head commit of the most recent dependency
PR. This should list all commits that are in the current PR that are not
part of that dependency commit. Produce the "warning" message if that
diff will include any commits that are in any other dependency PR.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
The labeling script will now directly set a check status for the PR as
`pending` when it marks something as dependent, and clear it when it no
longer is. This emulates a check that starts when marked as dependent
and runs until the last dependency lands, allowing automerge and other
workflows to work cleanly.
The branch protection rule will have to be updated to the new spelling.
This should do the same key thing as #7113, but integrated to the new
script.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
Instead of linking to the first commit to be reviewed, link to the
complete series of commits to review. Include a warning if not all the
commits in that range should be reviewed due to non-linear history.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
This should detect when a PR has a dependency of another open PR and add
a comment and label describing it. The comment will even do a
best-effort to compute the best starting commit for review.
Whenever PRs are closed, it will also scan the open depnedent PRs and
try to either remove the PRs in the comment or if it reaches zero the
label.
It works to update a single comment on a PR rather than adding more
comments.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
Richard Smith
Chandler Carruth