This proposal introduces the concept of a _form_, which is a
generalization of
"type" that encompasses all of the information about an expression
that's
visible to the type system, including type and expression category.
Forms can be
composed into _tuple forms_ and _struct forms_, which lets us track the
categories of individual tuple and struct literal elements.
The proposal PR also adds `ref` bindings to the pattern matching
documentation,
but that is not part of the proposal itself; it's just bringing the
documentation
up to date with proposal
[#5434](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/5434).
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
This proposal removes the definition of the term "value binding" as a
primitive
category conversion from reference to value, replacing it with the term
"value
acquisition". The other meaning of "value binding", a binding declared
by a
value binding pattern, is unchanged.
Updates the documentation under `docs/design/` to use `ref` instead of
`addr` after their removal in #5434. Care was taken to manually clean up
edge cases and, in a couple cases, surrounding text (see
3d72c49bb75c0f40ca7e8114b6a1369b941e1697). After this change, there are
no matches for `addr(?!ess)` in `docs/design/`.
Closes#6032
- A parameter binding can be marked `ref` instead of `var` or the
default. It will bind to reference argument expressions in the caller
and produces a reference expression in the callee.
- Unlike pointers, a `ref` binding can't be rebound to a different
object.
- This replaces `addr`, and is not restricted to the `self` parameter.
- A `ref` binding, like a value binding, can't be used in fields of
classes or structs.
- When calling functions, arguments to non-`self` `ref` parameters are
also marked with `ref`.
- The return of a function can optionally be marked `ref`, `val`, or
`var`. These control the category of the call expression invoking the
function, and how the return expression is returned.
- These may be mixed for functions returning tuple or struct forms.
- The address of a `ref` binding is `nocapture` and `noalias`.
- We mark parameters of a function that may be referenced by the return
value with `bound`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This proposal re-affirms (with additional rationale) that a `var`
pattern
declares a durable complete object, and refines the terminology for
binding
patterns in a `var` pattern to be more explicit about the intended
semantics. It
also makes several other changes and clarifications to the semantics of
pattern
matching on objects:
- The storage for a variable pattern is initialized eagerly, rather than
being
deferred until the end of pattern matching.
- Any initializing expressions in the scrutinee of a `match` statement
are
materialized before matching the `case`s.
- An initializing expression can only initialize temporary storage or a
single
variable pattern, not a tuple/struct pattern or a subobject of a
variable
pattern. Removing this limitation is left as future work.
Finally, as a drive-by fix, it clarifies what parts of the `match`
design are
still placeholders.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
The prettier pre-commit mirror is no longer supported
(https://github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-prettier). This switches to a
direct call, and updates to 3.3.3. And I'm now specifying types for it
to apply to, rather than letting it ignore unknown files; overall just
trying to separate out which linter sees what.
To comment on formatting changes:
- In most cases, seems to be getting confused by `[]` use in markdown
when it's not part of a link. This looks like a regression, but not one
we're broadly affected by.
- p0107.md - caught an issue with a malformed broken bad link which I've
tried to fix.
- p3720.md - looks like a fix.
Note, prettier has a 4.0.0 alpha release. As best as I could tell, that
only affected the .prettierrc.yaml processing. I changed the glob there
for forwards compatibility.
Includes proposals:
- #990
- #2188
- #2138
- #2200
- #2360
- #2760
- #2964
- #3162
Also tries to use more precise language when talking about:
- implementations, to avoid confusing `impl` declaration and definitions
with the `impls` operator used in `where` clauses, an issue brought up
in #2495 and #2483;
- "binding patterns", like `x: i32`, and "bindings" like `x`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Introduce a concrete design for how Carbon values, objects, storage,
variables,
and pointers will work. This includes fleshing out the design for:
- The expression categories used in Carbon to represent values and
objects,
how they interact, and terminology that anchors on their expression
nature.
- An expression category model for readonly, abstract values that can
efficiently support function inputs.
- A customization system for value expression representations,
especially as
seen on function boundaries in the calling convention.
- An expression category model for references instead of a type system
model.
- How patterns match different expression categories.
- How initialization works in conjunction with function returns.
- Specific pointer syntax, semantics, and library customization
mechanisms.
- A `const` type qualifier for use when the value expression category
system
is too abstracted from the underlying objects in storage.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Leravat <Pixep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Chandler Carruth
Geoff Romer
Calvin
