This adds fields to `EntityWithParamsBase` to reflect the intention with
`extern library` design. I'm renaming `decl_id` because it shouldn't be
expected to be assigned anymore. import_ref.cpp I'm deliberately keeping
on `first_owning_decl_id` (which will break when importing `extern
library` declarations). Most other cases are for diagnostics, and I'm
using `latest_decl_id` to try and get the closest declaration to the
error. Note I'm partly splitting out this PR to show the test effect,
which apparently we don't test related cases.
The prior code crashed when trying to find the function's `Self`
parameter, I believe. `fail_redefine_with_dependents.carbon` handles
this case. It wasn't caught by the prior case because the `F` didn't
have any dependent parameters.
Note this also ran into a formatter crash, with invalid constants. I'm
fixing that here, but will also note it on #4145 (the crash in
FinishGenericDecl was muddled by a crash in Formatter code).
It's actually possible to get into all four combinations of having
parameter lists versus being generic:
- An entity nested within a generic, such as a member class, can be
generic even if it has no parameters.
- As a corner case, an entity with an *empty* parameter list has
parameter lists, but isn't a generic because it doesn't have any generic
parameters.
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
I'd considered moving DeclParams uses over, but when handling qualified
names, there's a parse node instead of an instruction. I did try to
unify a couple other uses though, including adding MergeDefinition. I
expect `interface` will use a little more once it's more completely
implemented, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
Note this isn't implementing checking through imports. The parse node
there is harder to access through the context, so would require
examining the entity in order to get the import declaration, to get at
the ImportIR. We also don't have a parse tree attached in that case, and
would need to add one to SemIR::File. But I believe we do want to add
that, so it's explicitly a TODO.
Note GetTokenText re-lexes literal values, so there's a bit of potential
overhead there. Not sure if we want a more efficient manner for
comparing in cases like this.
This is for consistency with #4120. Similar to that, we can use
overloads on the typed NodeId rather than individually named handlers.
There isn't the same caller benefit here though, since the calls from
check.cpp are already boilerplate.
We can't use the instruction from the generic directly, because it
doesn't have the right constant value. Instead add an instruction that
models the transition from the constant value in the generic to the
constant value in the generic instance.
Also start associating the self generic instance with unqualified
lookups that find results in an enclosing generic, so that we track the
information necessary to create the new instruction.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
When checking a declaration or definition of a generic, track a list of
created instructions that depend on the generic's parameters in some
way, along with information on how they depend on the parameters. This
will eventually be used to determine what information we need to compute
when creating instances of the generic, but for now we're just building
the list.
Information is tracked separately for the declaration region and the
definition region of the generic, because in general these may be first
provided in separate declarations, and they should be substituted into
at different times.
In a `class C(T:! type)`, the type `Self` should be `C(T)`, not merely
`C`. Similarly, in an `interface I(T:! type)`, the type of self should
be `I(T)`, not merely `I`.
In `ClassType`s and `InterfaceType`s, track a `GenericInstanceId` for
the instance rather than just the argument list.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Build a `Generic` object for generic functions. This object tracks the
generic parameters that are in scope for the generic entity. Eventually
it will track other information about the generic too.
Add basic SemIR formatting support for generic functions.
This is mostly mechanically duplicating work done for generic classes to
also support generic interfaces.
Also fix both generic interfaces and generic classes to support
importing class and interface types with arguments from another file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
Adds access to the name lookup table in name scopes. This is so that we
can quickly check access during name lookup without resolving the entity
itself. Does this for names in general, but does not implement handling
for entity-scoped names, only namespace-scoped names (where they're
essentially just not exported).
Excludes `private` names from exports. Although names should be
accessible to `impl` files, that's not implemented here because we'll
probably want to do it by directly copying name lookup tables.
Playing with the macro suggestion on #4028, replace DeclKind with some
templating that asserts the in-use token is an introducer token. This
allows type-safe usage of Lex::TokenKind, reducing the benefit of a
separate enum while improving stdout (since now this will ostream as the
keyword name).
Check the parameters specified in a name qualifier against the
parameters of the entity that the qualifier refers to.
For interfaces, this required adding minimal support for parameterized
interface names.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
With private modifiers, we'll want to start checking modifiers later,
e.g. after a name conflict is detected (and potentially merged). I think
we've agreed to be more explicit about whether the modifier functions
are manipulating state, versus trying to keep the state on the stack a
little longer (moving Pop to the end of these functions).
Removing FileScope from the stack and renaming it to DeclIntroducerStack
to better reflect the usage and behavior. The FileScope mostly reflects
an approach that wasn't ultimately adopted.
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.
Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.
One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.
I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138
I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
Following up on discussion from #3948, doing a general rename of
"enclosing scope" to "parent scope" (and "enclosing scopes" to "ancestor
scopes"). The intent is to improve understandability and collide less
with C++ terminology for "enclosing scope". Note this changes most uses
of "enclosing", but leaves behind a few like "enclosing function" and
"enclosing block".
Note this does create some "parent class" mentions for "adapt" and "var"
(the class they're within), which is maybe unfortunate, but we'd
probably say "base class" if we meant inheritance so perhaps that's
okay. Along the same lines, these are the only `parent_class` uses I see
now, and we do have a few `base_class`.
Trying to conform with #4009. Changes SemIR::LocIdAndInst construction
to root out struct init cases with AddInst and related functions. I'm
using templating of AddInst functions in order to avoid `AddInst(loc_id,
InstName{...})` and instead have `AddInst<InstName>(loc_id, {...})` with
I think similar readability results. There are a couple cases where inst
construction is templated and so designated initializers couldn't be
used, so this may be better for those in particular due to the extra
type enforcement.
This probably doesn't clean up every last case, but I was trying to get
the bulk at once without bleeding over into less related changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Right now, each sequential modifier verification tends to re-fetch the
enclosing scope, doing equivalent verification. Change code to more
explicitly do the fetch once, sharing the result, also making the
enclosing scope available to the caller for other work.
Note, the type store similarly carries an inst store pointer; that's
what I'm basing having the name scope store's inst store pointer on.
Previously we did some of this in decl_name_stack and some of it in the
callers of decl_name_stack. Factor out a single place to pop a name and
its optional following parameters.
Part of making this behavior consistent is that we now track whether an
implicit parameter list was present or absent rather than mapping an
absent list to `InstBlockId::Empty`. This improves our redeclaration
checking and the precision of some diagnostics.
This is primarily to avoid the use of `!!` in code, trying not to create
too much code as a result (obviously still a net increase). Also
refactoring to its own file to make the enum easier to find.
Note, NodeCategory does similar, I might propose similar there if
everyone's good with the API. However, that's just two, so creating
something like enum_base felt like too much.
I think the new name is more consistent for how `enclosing_scope_id` is
used relative to `name_id` (even removing the clarifying note on
`enclosing_scope_id_for_new_inst`). Suggesting `initial_scope_index` as
a replacing for the old `enclosing_scope`, hoping it's a little clearer.
I'm replacing `target_scope_id` uses in modifier logic because they
seemed to be based on the NameContext use.
Use a level comparison during substitution to determine whether we're
substituting a particular binding. Evaluate symbolic bindings with the
same name and the same level to the same symbolic constant, for example
across redeclarations of a generic function.
In parse, form a list of methods that are defined inline, tracking where
they start, where they end, and which other inline methods are nested
within them.
In check, when we reach an inline method body, skip it and add it to a
worklist to be processed later. We also track when we reach the start
and end of a context in which inline method bodies are deferred, so that
we know when to replay the bodies.
When suspending a function definition to be processed later, the
`DeclNameStack` entry is moved to separate storage, including popping
the corresponding scopes from the scope stack and removing the
corresponding lexical names from lexical lookup. Later, when we return
to the function and parse its definition, the `DeclNameStack` entry is
restored. The same is done when we reach the end of a nested context
that can have inline methods, so that we can reenter the nested scope
before processing its members.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This replaces all invalid node IDs in import_ref.cpp with references to
the imported instruction.
This splits out ReplaceInstBeforeConstantUse into a separate function
when the LocationId is replaced, as for splicing. That's the less common
case, whereas others would need to provide the LocationId in order just
to not change the value.
Per #3714, some of the details here are not yet settled. In particular,
we might want `Self` to come into scope at the start of the definition,
not at the `as` keyword. However, this change allows us to accept the
uncontroversial examples.
This was previously discussed at
https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1209975051588210729.
I'm initiating this mainly because we typically use "id" suffixes to
indicate an `IdBase` being passed around and the non-id suffix of
`parse_node` suggests at it carrying more data than it actually does.
There used to be more reason for avoiding `node_id` because
`SemIR::InstId` used to be named `NodeId`, but that's no longer
necessary. As a consequence, I'd like to rename `parse_node` to more
precisely reflect its type.
In full, this is doing:
```
parse_node_kind -> node_kind
parse_node -> node_id
ParseNodeCategory -> NodeCategory
ParseNodeKind -> NodeKind
ParseNode -> NodeId
```
This is primarily in check and sem_ir, but with some `parse_node_kind`
references in parse too.
Pluralization is consistent with name forms on both sides, so that
wasn't part of my replacements.
This doesn't add full support. I'm separating it out to make the effects
of the modifier changes clearer for review. I'm restructuring a little
with the expectation that we'll have some more categories of modifier
keywords in the future (similar to `extern`, these may not be in a "set"
such as access), and thus easily scaling up to a few more would be
useful.
#3740 added another similar call. This may be temporary, maybe we'll
stop using and remove later, but it's a small simplification right now
and we might also retain a similar inst -> constant -> type flow.
`Self` is modeled as a `bind_symbolic_name` with no corresponding value,
for now at least. In the future it might make sense to model it as a new
kind of instruction, or as a `bind_symbolic_name` whose value is a
`param`, but for now we just want it to introduce a symbolic constant.
In order to convert a value like the `Self` of an interface to a type, a
new instruction `facet_type_access` is introduced. This notionally
accesses the "type" field within a facet, converting it from a pair of
(type, witness) into just the type.
When declaring an associated entity in an interface -- just associated
functions for now -- create an associated entity value and corresponding
type to represent a "slot in a witness table". Also track the list of
associated entities on the interface so that we will eventually be able
to check impls against them.
Associated entities are represented as the integer index of their slot
in a witness table.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Interface support is pretty skeletal so this may need additions later,
but I think it's still worthwhile to fill in the necessary bits now.
With this change, the expectation is then that everything we have right
now which _can_ be imported, is supported for import (at least for the
"current package, no overlap" case).
By adding a constant to ClassDecl/InterfaceDecl, we're able to remove
name reference special-casing. Use TryEvalInst on the Decl to generate
the Type. For ClassDecl, then use the generated constant for
self_type_id.
Previously, we created scopes for implicit parameter lists and tuple
patterns, but that meant that bindings went out of scope too soon. We
now keep them in scope until the end of the enclosing declaration. This
is accomplished by pushing a scope for parameters when we handle a name
that might have them, and then popping the scope again if it turns out
that there were no parameters.
For a case such as:
```carbon
fn A(T:! type).B(U:! type).F(x: T, y: U) {
var z: T;
}
```
... we now have the following scopes in the stack:
- A parameter scope containing `T`.
- A class scope for `A(T:! type)`.
- A parameter scope containing `U`.
- A class scope for `A(T:! type).B(U:! type)`.
- A parameter scope containing `x: T` and `y: U`.
- A function body scope containing `z: T`.
The innermost scope when check processes a declaration of a function,
class, or similar is now often a parameter scope rather than the
enclosing scope in which the class or function is declared, so the
target scope is now passed explicitly into the modifier checking code
that wants to inspect that enclosing scope.
Building on #3636 which handles the general import case, add special
casing for namespaces. Namespaces can be combined cross-IR, so it's a
little more complex.
The implementation adds import_id to the Namespace instruction as a
reference to find the original using the normal structure. This is
achieved by moving the name_id to NameScope to free up space.
---
I considered a few alternatives...
I considered adding import_id to NameScope, but:
1. It's more consistent with things such as Function or Class that
provide name_id on the info object rather than the instruction.
2. I thought it more likely that there would be more NameScope cases
that might want a name_id rather than the import_id, since ImportRef
will typically be used.
I considered putting the import source (cross-ref IR id + inst id) on
the NameScope versus a separate ImportRef, which seems like the
strongest argument towards the NameScope approach because it removes an
instruction. That just felt inconsistent though, and the overhead of
instruction-per-imported-namespace should be low (theoretically few
namespaces should be used). Plus I feel a bit odd adding two
generally-unused ids to NameScope.
A specialized Namespace structure could also have been created to store
the import_id, but that would add an indirection to the NameScope.
This makes duplicate and previous definition handling match. While we
may want to make both point more fine-grained at the name, the necessary
logic seems likely to be equivalent.
Note, I'm looking at this mainly due to duplicate names in imports,
where it's especially helpful to take an instruction instead of a parse
node. We'll eventually want to handle parse nodes from other imports
better, and I think this is the way it would most likely work.
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.
This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
The parse nodes are still tracked as part of the same value store
interface in order to ensure parity, but they're split out from Inst
itself in order to reduce the size of Inst -- the expectation is that
they don't need to be passed around quite as much.
This change doesn't actually reduce the passing very much, although
there are hints of it: AddInstAndPush doesn't typically need a separate
parse node from the one on the Inst itself, for example. In a couple
spots I changed code to rely a little more on the InstId until the
ParseNode is needed, but it's very low hanging fruit where done. I think
convert could do more to not eagerly fetch the parse node before its
use, but more cleanup felt it would be easier to handle separately. I'm
currently viewing this as making such cleanup _possible_ rather than
executing on it up-front.
But also, I want to make sure there's a consensus to head in this
direction before pulling the trigger. We speculated that this would
result in the parse node being passed around less, and I do think that's
the case, although it's a bit fuzzy in the change.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Namespaces are copied, which means also adding their name to the
underlying instruction. It happened not to be done previously; the name
was only in name lookup.
Since the only import supported right now is the default import,
functionality is limited; in the future I'll need to deal with namespace
vs package conflicts.
Tests of namespace imports are under "namespace" -- I figured this would
be best for scaling as more instructions get support.
This also improves some debugging-related output that I was trying to
use while trying to build the support.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This change adds a `BindSymbolicName` instruction for generic bindings,
paralleling the existing `BindName`. A mechanism is also added to allow
both kinds of binding to be accessed uniformly, for convenience in the
case where the two different kinds of binding are treated the same.
Generic bindings of type `type` are allowed to be used as types,
although no operations are provided for such types. For now lowering
treats these types as empty structs, which seems like a reasonable
lowering for non-monomorphized unconstrained types.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith
Geoff Romer
Chandler Carruth