Also stop supporting `var` with initializer inside `for`.
Resolves TODO in `handle_variable.cpp`
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This change adds a `BindSymbolicName` instruction for generic bindings,
paralleling the existing `BindName`. A mechanism is also added to allow
both kinds of binding to be accessed uniformly, for convenience in the
case where the two different kinds of binding are treated the same.
Generic bindings of type `type` are allowed to be used as types,
although no operations are provided for such types. For now lowering
treats these types as empty structs, which seems like a reasonable
lowering for non-monomorphized unconstrained types.
Previously would fail with:
```
CHECK failure at toolchain/parse/node_kind.cpp:74: Lex::TokenKind::Error == expected_token_kind || token_kind == expected_token_kind: Created parse node with NodeKind NamedConstraintDecl and has_error 1 for lexical token kind Constraint, but expected token kind Semi
```
Issue found by fuzzing.
These are intended to allow the structure of a parse tree node to be
described more precisely in code, to support these use cases:
- Automated checking that the parse tree conforms to the expected
structure. (Added to `Tree::Verify`.)
- Easier reading and understanding of the structure of the parse tree by
toolchain developers. (See `parse/typed_nodes.h`.)
- Easier navigation of the parse tree, for example for tooling uses and
for use when forming diagnostics.
On this last point, an object representing the file may be inspecting
using `Tree::ExtractFile`, as in:
```
auto file = tree->ExtractFile();
for (AnyDeclId decl_id : file.decls) {
// `decl_id` is convertible to a `NodeId`.
if (std::optional<FunctionDecl> fn_decl =
tree->ExtractAs<FunctionDecl>(decl_id)) {
// fn_decl->params is a `TuplePatternId` (which extends `NodeId`)
// that is guaranteed to reference a `TuplePattern`.
std::optional<TuplePattern> params = tree->Extract(fn_decl->params);
// `params` has a value unless there was an error in that node.
} else if (auto class_def = tree->ExtractAs<ClassDefinition>(decl_id)) {
// ...
}
}
```
The `Extract...` functions collect the child nodes into the typed parse
node's fields (internally using a `Tree::SiblingIterator`) for easy
access. However, this is not as fast as directly observing the tree
structure using the postorder strategy being used by the check stage.
These functions rely on using struct reflection on the typed parse node
definitions from `parse/typed_nodes.h` to get the expected structure of
child nodes and then populate them.
Note that validating these in `Tree::Verify` adds significant cost to
it, and is currently included in the parsing stage. Without this change,
a 10 mloc test case of lex & parse takes 4.129 s ± 0.041 s. With this
change, it takes 5.768 s ± 0.036 s.
This builds upon and completes #3393.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This builds on the series of changes to NodeKinds, aiming to simplify
the NodeKind implementation a little, also making it clearer that
there's a single associated token for each parse node (or, for
placeholders/invalid parses, not validated).
Note that prior to the relevant changes, there were nodes with multiple
tokens. This change is also locking in the approach of one token per
parse node, by refactoring macros to stop supporting multiple.
Note #3486 rewrites the macro behavior, and is already approved: so this
PR is only for the changed enforcement during error. Also, #3493 already
changed several things to allow any token while this PR was awaiting
review, but this still changes enforcement for `For` and `If`.
This was brought up on
[#toolchain](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1182066616456970251),
and I think this any-on-error approach gets at least some support. We
could try setting it to the introducer, but it's quite possible we want
it to be something like the token which led to the parse error, rather
than a static token. That leads to a conclusion that, most typically,
we'll expect arbitrary tokens when error conditions may lead to tokens
which aren't the expected token.
A couple related, recent `CARBON_IF_ERROR` crash fixes can be found in
#3404 and #3424. Something like #3404 would've been needed regardless
because `namespace` didn't have `CARBON_IF_ERROR` before, although I
might've missed the underlying issue with declarations because only
`namespace` had a relevant test (that is, if #3404 had added
`CARBON_ANY_TOKEN_ON_ERROR`, I wouldn't have had a crash in #3462).
#3424 would've been avoided with this change because there was a
`CARBON_IF_ERROR`, and it was just too restrictive.
This leaves a single state for each in the expr loop. I was trying to
think through ways to have per-token states, but they felt sort of
bulky.
Note this is more verbose: but I think the long-term is going to be that
when we start wanting to add handlers, we're going to need to switch to
different names based on the token found. As a consequence, the parse
state logic will end up diverging a little, and we'll just want to align
towards boilerplate handlers.
Short-term, this opens up a path for saying that each parse node
corresponds to precisely one token in success states, and separates out
what were becoming big handler functions in check.
StructFieldUnknown was used previously for invalid parses. But we have
added other, more common ways of talking about those; so this is
removing the special-case.
This remains structurally valid although we don't use this operator or
have a design for it, this at least fixes a fuzzer-found crash.
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This is also doing the parse node split, allowing lower reliance in
formatter on the tokenized buffer (something that I may be touching more
due to import handling).
(Split out of #3410)
Consistently use `ParenExpr` solely for parenthesized single
expressions, and use more syntax-oriented terminology for states and
nodes that might represent either a `ParenExpr` or a tuple literal.
In theory because none are allowed. This is to improve consistency in
handle_decl_name_scope's modifier handling, removing the namespace
special-case.
I noticed there's a crash bug on `impl <declaration>` which I'll address
separately.
This builds on #3461.
This is supporting a direction that all parse nodes should correspond to
a single token, allowing for reduced tokenized buffer access during
checking (it's still necessary for diagnostics, and some literals).
One of the justifications for a unified parse node was implementation
LOC: note this is slightly smaller, using macros to reduce some
duplication. While this does add more switching in HandleDeclScopeLoop,
that's offset by less explicit switching in the check handlers. Also, I
think the duplication in HandleDeclScopeLoop can be reduced by shifting
the flow there, which I'll do in a separate PR.
This creates a namespace for `package` scope.
It looks like names of class_decls in namespaces lead to an unexpected
instref. This is already true, as best as I can tell. I'm not sure if
there's a preferred approach to address that, so I've left a TODO for
now.
I was suggesting this because `FloatingPoint` is pretty long. `int` and
`float` should be familiar abbreviations. `unsigned` should be familiar
to developers too, but `UnsignedInt` still feels usefully clearer for
the additional chars.
When a `namespace` keyword has no `;` following it, we recover by
building a parse tree `Namespace` node from the `Namespace` token (as
there isn't a `;` token). Allow this correspondence on errors.
Also teach the diagnostics in this case to avoid the end-of-file token
as that's almost always going to be a less meaningful location. Instead,
we can point at the introducer which should at least be in the code that
led to the error.
This should cover:
```
library "lib" api;
import Foo library default;
import library default;
import library "lib";
```
This splits out `PackageName` and `LibraryName` to their own parse nodes
so that checking can ignore them and still get a balanced parse tree
(otherwise, we essentially need to implement handling of the parse nodes
only to remove the identifiers/string literals -- the optional names
mean we can't blindly do that as before). For reference, these nodes
don't need to be handled because CheckParseTree will need to directly
funnel import information along with checked IRs.
For now, we require the same introducer to be used each time a class is
declared, but see #3384.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Implement toolchain support for `returned var` and `return var`.
- Modeled `returned` in the parse tree as a `ReturnedSpecifier`
appearing after the `VariableIntroducer`.
- Modeled `return var` in the parse tree as a `ReturnVarSpecifier`
appearing after the `ReturnStatementStart`.
- Factored out the implementation of `return` statement and `returned
var` handling in check into a new `return.{h,cpp}`. The parse nodes
themselves are still handled in `handle_*.cpp`. This allows easy code
reuse between `return` and `returned var`.
This detects ordering issues with the `package` and `import` statements.
`library` is changed from package-specific to instead be generic between
the two, since structurally it's non-specific.
The next step would be to start exposing the results for the driver to
make ordering decisions for checking. That'll involve further
modifications to this code, but this felt like a reasonable change point
because it's the extent of the parser enforcement, and still causes
significant refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Retain the `ClassDeclaration` node to represent a syntactic declaration
of a class (including possibly a declaration of a generic class), but
use a separate SemIR node to represent the class type itself. This
allows us to give the two separate treatment.
The `ClassDeclaration` is still entered into the name lookup table for
its enclosing scope, but when it is named in an expression, the class
type is produced instead. When the class declaration is named in a
declaration name, it can be used to define members of the class, but an
expression that resolves to the class type cannot be used to define
members of the class.
In order to distinguish these cases, use `Name` rather than
`NameExpression` for the left-hand side of a `QualifiedName` parse node.
This removes the only use of the `Expression` form of a declaration
name, so that is also removed.
In the future, `ClassType` will also be used to describe types such as
`Vector(T)`, for which there is no corresponding `ClassDeclaration`.
Can specify which tokens are allowed generally, and any additional
tokens that only occur when the parse node has an error.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
A `let` declaration is represented by a `bind_name` node in SemIR:
```carbon-semir
%b: i32 = bind_name "b", %a
```
Because `Check` encounters the pattern before it sees the value, we
first create the `bind_name` node with an unset value and don't add it
to the block. Then, once we've seen and converted the initializer, we
update the `bind_name` to have the value and add it to the current
block, after the initializer code.
This removes a (very) hot branch in the lexer where we need to special
case when a token is the first token and can't look at its previous
token. It also seems like a generally nice change to the structure of
both the token buffer and parse tree as there are now bracketing
elements for both ends and we should be able to avoid similar branching
in the future.
Mostly mechanical updates to the lexer and parser code to handle this,
but also needed to special case the location information in the
autoupdate code. And then the usual large body of auto-updated tests.
No benchmark data for this change alone as in isolation and in the
current lexer structure it doesn't make a big difference. But this
branch was particularly difficult to handle when trying to update the
whitespace skipping code to be faster, and so I think it is worth
systematically avoiding the special case here.
josh11b
Geoff Romer
Jon Ross-Perkins