This is primarily being done for performance reasons, removing hash
lookups. The increased memory consumption is accepted.
Refactors LexicalLookup out to its own structure.
Namespaces are copied, which means also adding their name to the
underlying instruction. It happened not to be done previously; the name
was only in name lookup.
Since the only import supported right now is the default import,
functionality is limited; in the future I'll need to deal with namespace
vs package conflicts.
Tests of namespace imports are under "namespace" -- I figured this would
be best for scaling as more instructions get support.
This also improves some debugging-related output that I was trying to
use while trying to build the support.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
By adding an InstId to the NameScope, we can determine whether the
declaration is being added to a scoped entity (versus a namespace).
The choice of InstId on NameScope is chosen versus other solutions
because, for imports, we want to just have a list of InstIds to import
and, from those, get the containing namespaces for addition. Similar may
also be desirable for printing fully qualified names given a singular
InstId. That means an InstId must have a path to find enclosing name
scopes.
What we're looking at here is:
- NameScopeId knows its InstId. (done here)
- Inst knows the enclosing NameScopeId. (future work)
- To walk up enclosing scopes for an Inst:
1. Fetch the Inst.
2. Find its enclosing NameScopeId (which will be per-declaration due to
Function etc complexity).
3. Fetch the NameScope if not Package scope. (if Package scope, done)
4. Use the InstId on the NameScope to go back to step 1.
This reflects how we're naming classes that derive from these classes,
and matches usage for each existing `Id` and `Index` type, except:
- `Parse::NodeId` previously inherited from `ComparableIndexBase`, and
is no longer comparable.
- `SemIR::MemberIndex` previously inherited from `IndexBase`, and is now
comparable.
Making `Parse::NodeId` non-comparable reflects that it's intended to be
an opaque identifier for a node and that the ordering is an
implementation detail rather than part of the intended public interface.
`PostorderIterator` and `SiblingIterator` still rely on the numerical
meaning of `NodeId`s, but that's OK since they're part of the node
implementation.
These are manual fixes; mostly from clang-tidy, some from clangd (which
notes unused includes).
In typed_insts, adding inlline due to misc-definitions-in-headers. Per
discussion, clang-tidy is wrong, but inline silences it.
For parameter name skew in definition versus declaration, I'm just using
the name from the definition.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Jon Ross-Perkins
josh11b