Remove the type canonicalization mechanism and instead rely on constant
canonicalization to deduplicate types.
Rename the `Canonicalize*Type` functions to reflect that they're no
longer performing canonicalization. Switch code that creates types due
to semantic checking, rather than due to source syntax, to directly
create type constants through evaluation rather than creating an
instruction and evaluating it to produce a separate constant
representation.
The mapping from `const (const T)` that was previously performed by type
canonicalization is now implemented in expression evaluation instead.
The value `<error>` is now treated as a constant value, with a special
property that an instruction involving `<error>` that could possibly be
constant evaluates to `<error>`. This helps avoid producing follow-on
errors when an error occurs as a subexpression of an expression, such as
a type, that is intended to be constant.
This makes duplicate and previous definition handling match. While we
may want to make both point more fine-grained at the name, the necessary
logic seems likely to be equivalent.
Note, I'm looking at this mainly due to duplicate names in imports,
where it's especially helpful to take an instruction instead of a parse
node. We'll eventually want to handle parse nodes from other imports
better, and I think this is the way it would most likely work.
Rather than producing multiple constants with the same value, fold all
instances of a given constant to the same constant instruction.
A future PR will use this to replace the current type canonicalization
system.
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.
This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
The parse nodes are still tracked as part of the same value store
interface in order to ensure parity, but they're split out from Inst
itself in order to reduce the size of Inst -- the expectation is that
they don't need to be passed around quite as much.
This change doesn't actually reduce the passing very much, although
there are hints of it: AddInstAndPush doesn't typically need a separate
parse node from the one on the Inst itself, for example. In a couple
spots I changed code to rely a little more on the InstId until the
ParseNode is needed, but it's very low hanging fruit where done. I think
convert could do more to not eagerly fetch the parse node before its
use, but more cleanup felt it would be easier to handle separately. I'm
currently viewing this as making such cleanup _possible_ rather than
executing on it up-front.
But also, I want to make sure there's a consensus to head in this
direction before pulling the trigger. We speculated that this would
result in the parse node being passed around less, and I do think that's
the case, although it's a bit fuzzy in the change.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This is accomplished by tracking an extra bit on the ID we store in the
constant values table, and propagating that from subexpressions to the
enclosing expression. This extra bit is not yet computed correctly for
types; that will be addressed in later PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Form a side table with constant values for each instruction. Evaluation
is only supported for a few very simple kinds of instruction for now.
This is not observable outside of the SemIR output, because nothing
depends on expressions having a constant value phase yet.
This is primarily being done for performance reasons, removing hash
lookups. The increased memory consumption is accepted.
Refactors LexicalLookup out to its own structure.
Namespaces are copied, which means also adding their name to the
underlying instruction. It happened not to be done previously; the name
was only in name lookup.
Since the only import supported right now is the default import,
functionality is limited; in the future I'll need to deal with namespace
vs package conflicts.
Tests of namespace imports are under "namespace" -- I figured this would
be best for scaling as more instructions get support.
This also improves some debugging-related output that I was trying to
use while trying to build the support.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This change adds a `BindSymbolicName` instruction for generic bindings,
paralleling the existing `BindName`. A mechanism is also added to allow
both kinds of binding to be accessed uniformly, for convenience in the
case where the two different kinds of binding are treated the same.
Generic bindings of type `type` are allowed to be used as types,
although no operations are provided for such types. For now lowering
treats these types as empty structs, which seems like a reasonable
lowering for non-monomorphized unconstrained types.
This is a step towards adding enclosing scopes for imports. It creates
an indirection for all bind names.
We discussed specializing for bindings that are in function scope (i.e.,
not a useful enclosing scope for imports or diagnostics). However, the
thought is to go ahead with this singular approach for now, and only
change structure if it's a performance issues so that we have
incrementally fewer instructions to handle.
This builds out a little infrastructure for one name scope to `extend`
another. We'll need more refinement here to cover other cases, but this
should provide some foundation for that future work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Adds a `LazyImportRef` instruction. Versus `CrossRef`, this is intended
to represent an instruction which cannot be used directly, and must be
replaced when it comes up due to name lookup. The intent is to use this
to avoid recursive loading of imported IR instructions.
Note, under this model, when `ResolveIfLazyImportRef` is called, it
essentially needs to load both inst and type information to a sufficient
point where any further attempts would hit name lookup again. That will
probably be complex, and the current implementation is just touching the
surface of the issue. I was heading down this route because it would
mean we have a limited number of points that need to consider whether
they're going to talk about a `LazyImportRef`.
I'm considering whether `CrossRef` should be dropped in favor of more
specific `Builtin` special-casing, due to the divergence of desired
behaviors. This could mean dropping the `builtins` IR since it's not
looking useful right now.
Modify `NameScope` to track whether the scope is associated with a load
error. This is to handle cases where one or more imports failed, so we
do not want to issue warnings for related scopes.
The 0-size on `ValueStore` comes up due to the changes to `NameScope`,
which make it too large for the default handling. After discussion with
zygoloid, the thought was we might want to try reserving a roughly
correct value based on parse node counts, but the stack default wasn't
buying much.
Fixes a bug where the implicit import used the package name instead of
the invalid identifier.
BinaryOperatorAdd had been added early on as a proof-of-concept for
toolchain design for parsing -> checking flow. However, it doesn't
reflect the interface direction for operators, and now other portions of
the toolchain demonstrate the relevant logic. Instead, it's just a bit
of an outlier versus other instructions which have evolved over time.
I was suggesting this because `FloatingPoint` is pretty long. `int` and
`float` should be familiar abbreviations. `unsigned` should be familiar
to developers too, but `UnsignedInt` still feels usefully clearer for
the additional chars.
This gets to a lifetime subtlety, particularly with things like the
sorting diagnostic consumer that delay output. In order to reduce the
chance of accidental references, disallow StringRef in the diagnostics.
For example:
```
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:162:5: error: static_assert failed due to requirement '!std::is_same_v<llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef>' "Use std::string or llvm::StringLiteral for diagnostic lifetimes."
static_assert(
^
toolchain/check/convert.cpp:477:11: note: in instantiation of member function 'Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<std::string, std::string, llvm::StringRef>::DiagnosticBase' requested here
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(StructInitMissingFieldInConversion, Error,
^
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:47:7: note: expanded from macro 'CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC'
::Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<__VA_ARGS__>( \
^
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This adds instructions so that we get printing. I may adjust the
instruction format a little further to add a type, but I think the basic
setup will remain.
Note this builds on #3414
Implement toolchain support for `returned var` and `return var`.
- Modeled `returned` in the parse tree as a `ReturnedSpecifier`
appearing after the `VariableIntroducer`.
- Modeled `return var` in the parse tree as a `ReturnVarSpecifier`
appearing after the `ReturnStatementStart`.
- Factored out the implementation of `return` statement and `returned
var` handling in check into a new `return.{h,cpp}`. The parse nodes
themselves are still handled in `handle_*.cpp`. This allows easy code
reuse between `return` and `returned var`.
Instead of ad-hoc conversion tracking on some kinds of nodes that
conversion creates, consolidate tracking into a single node kind. This
frees up an operand on `Init` instructions that can be used to store the
destination.
Add a `NameId` that is effectively just a wrapper around a `StringId`,
with
some additional predefined values for names that don't correspond to
strings, such as the name of `self` or the function's return slot.
Another issue found while trying to make `package` work, lurking in
fuzzer inputs. This leaves TODOs because we probably do want to support
this, it's just non-trivial to fix.
This turns out to somewhat block `package` support because there's a
fuzzer test-case that does similar. The parse is valid so we should
probably handle it reasonably.
I suspect the `let` test case might work with a little effort, given it
shouldn't really require much evaluation. On the other hand, `var`
definitely shouldn't, and `fn` will probably require something like
`constexpr` plus more substantial compile-time evaluation support.
When declaring a name such as `fn Ns.Class.F() { ... }`, enter the
scopes of `Ns` and `Ns.Class` as we form the name, and remain in those
non-lexical scopes until the end of the declaration.
When performing an unqualified lookup, look in any enclosing non-lexical
scopes in addition to looking into the lexical name table.
We now track a scope index with each lookup result in the lexical name
lookup table. This is used to determine whether a lexical or non-lexcial
result is the innermost result and whether a declared name is in the
same scope as some previous introduction of that name or in a nested
scope. For now, this could just be the index into the scope_stack, but
the intent is to also use this to detect names being declared after they
are first looked up, which requires the indexes to outlive their scopes,
so we use a persistent numbering of all scopes instead. The persistent
numbering also permits more invariant checking.
Following up on discussion yesterday regarding this split.
Note, I'm expecting #3341 to do IdentifierId -> NameId in SemIR. It
might be worth adding NameId creation directly to StringStore if you're
content with this setup though.
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins
josh11b