This involves a number of supporting changes:
* The `parse_node;` member of instruction types may now have any type
derived from `Parse::NodeId` and is no longer required to have that
exact type.
* `Parse::Node::Invalid` is now a singleton object of a separate type
that is convertible to `Parse::NodeId` and its descendants. This
replaces the `Invalid` member of its descendants, and avoids having to
write long `NodeIdOneOf<...>` types when initializing variables to
invalid.
* `IndexBase` now allows `==` and `!=` comparisons between its derived
classes and types that are convertible to those types.
* A number of functions in the check stage have been changed to preserve
more type information instead of using `Parse::NodeId`.
* `NodeIdForKind<K>` (also known as `KId`) now has a `Kind` member so it
may be used to declare `NodeIdOneOf<T, U>` types without #including
`parse/typed_nodes.h`.
* `NodeIdForKind<K>` (also known as `KId`) may be implicitly converted
to `NodeIdOneOf<T, U>` if `T::Kind == K` or `U::Kind == K` (executing a
TODO).
Many of the `parse_node` members were not converted since they would
have required more extensive changes. They have been marked with "TODO"
comments.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This reflects how we're naming classes that derive from these classes,
and matches usage for each existing `Id` and `Index` type, except:
- `Parse::NodeId` previously inherited from `ComparableIndexBase`, and
is no longer comparable.
- `SemIR::MemberIndex` previously inherited from `IndexBase`, and is now
comparable.
Making `Parse::NodeId` non-comparable reflects that it's intended to be
an opaque identifier for a node and that the ordering is an
implementation detail rather than part of the intended public interface.
`PostorderIterator` and `SiblingIterator` still rely on the numerical
meaning of `NodeId`s, but that's OK since they're part of the node
implementation.
With the toolchain splitting namespaces, ostream.h's `operator<<`
templates aren't reliably found with name lookup, likely due to the loss
of associated namespaces (zygoloid commented on this at
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/3161#discussion_r1307941999).
This is especially a barrier to moving the lex files into `Carbon::Lex`;
versus other parts of the toolchain, they contain more printable types
which are used cross-namespace, including `Carbon::Testing`. As a
consequence, I'm looking at migrating ostream.h to a more reliable
approach that doesn't rely as much on everything being in the `Carbon`
namespace.
josh11bandRichard Smith
Jon Ross-Perkins