This will be more correct if a user file is named prelude.carbon, and
reduces the explorer runtime by about 10% by removing a string
comparison from the check for whether trace output is enabled.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Isolating test execution time (no build time included):
- Linux, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 28.214s, Critical Path: 13.97s
- Linux, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 11.534s, Critical Path: 6.05s
- Linux, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 11.677s, Critical Path: 11.17s
- Mac, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 295.686s, Critical Path: 20.00s
- Mac, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 55.788s, Critical Path: 3.81s
- Mac, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 16.269s, Critical Path: 7.54s
In GH actions:
- [Before](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4866602695/jobs/8678306144?pr=2799):
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 20m
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 15m
- test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 36m
- test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 21m
- [After](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4875154751/jobs/8697004066?pr=2811):
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 10m
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m
- test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 12m
- test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m
I'm still leaving a handful of `lit` tests to test end-to-end binary execution. This is why testdata directories are split (`lit` tests next to the `explorer` binary, the `cc_test`s next to `ParseAndExecute`).
I couldn't figure out a way to actually hit a reasonable out-of-memory case once I add the maximum interpreter step count. However, the step count limit seems more important.
I've moved the todo stack limit out of function calls because there are plenty of ways to build up the todo stack without any function calls.
Fixes#2791