When parsing a pattern, if we encounter something that isn't pattern
syntax, try parsing as an expression instead. We only need one-token
lookahead to distinguish pattern syntax from expression syntax.
Track a precedence group through pattern parsing so that we can allow
different kinds of expressions in a top-level pattern (such as the
operand of `let`) and in a nested pattern (such as a subpattern of a
tuple pattern or within grouping parens). For example, we do not allow
`case if ...`, and for now I've chosen to also not allow logical or
relational operators at the top level of a pattern, so `case 1 + 1` is
OK, but `case 1 == 1` and `case true and false` require parentheses.
This decision should be ratified or revisited by a design proposal.
Very basic check support is also provided, only sufficient to form an
`ExprPattern` instruction and nothing beyond that. For now, all pattern
matching against an `ExprPattern` fails with a TODO error. To support
that, I've switched from calling `BeginSubpattern` in the parent handler
of a pattern and `EndSubpatternAs*` in the pattern handler itself to
calling both functions in parent handlers, with `EndSubpattern`
converting an expression into an expression pattern where needed.
Depends on #6976.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Google Antigravity
Add `InstIs`, `GetInstAs`, and `TryGetInstAs` which act on the
underlying constant instruction in a constant value, to save an explicit
call to `GetInstId`.
```carbon
context.insts().GetAs<InstT>(context.constant_values().GetInstId(const_id))
```
can now be written as simply
```carbon
context.constant_values().GetInstAs<InstT>(const_id)
```
For future work, we might provide `GetInst()` so that
`context.insts().Get(context.constant_values().GetInstId(const_id)` can
be shortened also.
This enables some nice simplifications, and it's also a step toward a
broader restructuring of binding and parameter patterns.
Assisted-by: Gemini 3.1 Pro via Antigravity
This uses the `CARBON_KIND_ANY(AnyImportRef, auto import_ref):` syntax
that seemed to be favored [on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1478486848207720478).
This converted uses in the `sem_ir` directory to show it works
initially, then added `check` for full coverage plus validating the
`SemIR::` namespace discard.
Note in inst_namer.cpp, AnyBindingPattern includes FormBindingPattern
which wasn't previously handled.
I'm disabling clang-format because I think it formats with readability
issues, e.g.:
```
#define CARBON_KIND_ANY_EXPAND_AnyBinding(X, SEP) \
X(::Carbon::SemIR::AliasBinding) \
SEP X(::Carbon::SemIR::FormBinding) SEP X(::Carbon::SemIR::RefBinding) \
SEP X(::Carbon::SemIR::SymbolicBinding) \
SEP X(::Carbon::SemIR::ValueBinding)
```
Since `SEP` is typically a comma, it's also a nuisance to treat as an
argument to `X` (which could get better results).
Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini 3 Flash
This is a step toward removing the index from `InitForm`, so that equal
form values always have equal representations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
The general strategy here is to import the constructor with a signature
that directly matches the argument. The intent is that the imported
function will eventually be usable directly as the `ImplicitAs.Convert`
function in a generated `impl`.
For initialization from a tuple, for example `(1, 2)`, we import the
selected constructor with a signature that takes a tuple pattern:
`fn Class.Class((a: i32, b: i32)) -> Class;`
In order to support that, this PR also adds support in general for tuple
patterns in function signatures. It turns out the implementation was
already very close to allowing this.
Assisted-by: Gemini 3 Pro via Antigravity
`ReturnTypeInfo` is built around the assumption that a function call
results in exactly one initializing expression, but with `ref` returns
there may be zero, and in the future composite return forms will enable
there to be more than one. This change removes some usages of
`ReturnTypeInfo`, and restructures the calling code to be prepared for
multiple initializing returns.
This approach is more robust because there's no intermediate state where
the `ParamPattern` insts have been created, but don't yet have their
final values.
This separates the return type from the return pattern, and replaces the
return pattern with a block of return patterns. This is a step toward
support for `ref` returns (where there's no corresponding return
pattern) and compund-form returns (where there may be multiple return
patterns).
Every test that used `addr` before #6283 should be using `ref` after
this PR. In most cases that was done in #6283, but this PR transitions a
few that I missed in that first pass. In addition, #6283 cloned the old
`addr` tests from `foo.carbon` to `foo_addr.carbon` in order to maintain
test coverage during the transition; this PR removes those cloned tests.
There are two uses I'm not converting here, that seem to want the
"shortest" behavior. For everything else, I'm going to `zip_equal` since
it's more restrictive.
I wish `zip` were named `zip_shortest`.
This resolves a TODO in `expr_info.cpp` by using the inst kind rather
than the bound value to track the binding's category.
Since we're churning all the `bind_name` insts in testdata anyway, I'm
also taking this opportunity to align the inst naming with the design's
terminology, by calling these insts "bindings" (this aspect of the PR is
dependent on #6231 resolving an ambiguity in that terminology). For
consistency we'll need to rename several other insts as well (see the
TODO on `RefBinding`); I'm deferring that to a separate PR to minimize
the review load, but I think those name changes are in-scope for this
review.
Attach the cleanup to the `Temporary` instruction instead of to the
`TemporaryStorage` instruction. We create `TemporaryStorage`
instructions speculatively when creating an initializing expression, and
may overwrite those instructions with other instructions if it turns out
that a temporary is not required. Instead, wait until we finalize the
temporary and create a `Temporary` instruction to register the cleanup.
When the binding pattern appears within a `var` pattern, convert to a
reference. Otherwise, convert to a value.
This gets the advent of code examples to produce the right answers again
:)
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
The location of the diagnostic is an instruction id, not a parse node.
Converting to a parse node to call ToTokenOnly will drop the descendents
of the instruction being diagnosed, but the diagnostic is about the
whole instruction not just the root parse node of whatever instruction
it happens to be.
Remove calls to `InstStore::GetLocId()` to build a LocId from an InstId
now that they can be constructed directly from the InstId. Most uses of
LocId are just plumbing, so this does not affect them. However places
that want to look inside the LocId do not want to work with the InstId
form. In these places, introduce `InstStore::GetResolvedLocId()` which
converts a LocId (or an InstId as an optimization) into a LocId which is
not backed by an InstId. These locations can be printed (they have a
line and column when they are a NodeId), they can have flags added to
them (`ToImplicit`, `ToTokenOnly`), they can be converted to an
underlying ImportIRInstId, or they may be `None`.
`Dump()` is made to print a resolved location instead of printing the
InstId in the location, since (at least in my experience) the resolved
location is what is interesting in debugging, and this saves manual
`MakeInstId` steps in the debugger every time a location is of interest.
The LocId constructor from InstId is made `explicit` to add clarity to
function calls passing an `inst_id` now directly instead of calling
`context.insts().GetLocId(inst_id)`. To avoid needing to construct
`SemIR::LocId(...)` explicitly in all cases though, the diagnostics code
in Check uses `DiagnosticLocId` as its template parameter which accepts
InstId as well and does the construction of LocId from it.
Because LocId now requires an explicit construction from InstId, any
callers to `AddInst()` functions will have to explicitly convert to
LocId if they had an InstId, but not if they pass a NodeId. To make this
difference clear to callers, we `requires` that the input type can be
converted to LocId. This ensures that passing an InstId results in an
error at the callsite where the InstId is passed, instead of generating
a compiler error when trying to construct `LocIdAndInst` inside
`AddInst()`, which is less clear about what went wrong and doesn't seem
entirely intentional.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
We frequently want to operate on singletons. Per discussion, drop
`Singleton` to make the code shorter.
This started off as wanting to write `inst_id.is_error()`, but the
dependency relationship between ids.h and singleton_insts.h would
require some kind of delayed evaluation to allow the implementation to
remain in headers (which I suspect is helpful to have for inlining). I
could have added something like `IsErrorInst`, forward declared in ids.h
and defined in singleton_insts.h (which would always be included by
typed_insts.h), but the template approach felt like a decent balance
between (a) removing the boilerplate `::SingletonInstId`, (b)
understandability, (c) still visually mirroring if we immediately return
a singleton, and (d) flexibility for more than just `ErrorInst`. But TBH
I'd probably still have written `is_error()` if it didn't require
addressing the cross-header cycle.
Then I tried `SemIR::InstId::Is<SemIR::ErrorInst>`, which generally
worked with types but generated the complaint that it didn't shorten
*all* singleton uses. So pulling back on `::Is`, and instead just
dropping `Singleton`.
After #5280 there are a few more typed instructions that have an `InstId
type_inst_id` that always holds a type value. These are converted to
`TypeInstId` to encode this fact in the type system. The
`ConvertAggregateElement()` function in convert.cpp is now able to
receive `TypeInstId` for a couple arguments as well.
Additionally, the `type_inst_id` field of `StructTypeField` is made into
a `TypeInstId`.
The `TupleType::elements_id` is renamed to `TupleType::type_elements_id`
to try record the fact that it's an InstBlock of type value
instructions. We don't introduce a TypeInstBlockId at this time, but it
might be nice to make blocks of TypeInstIds in the future.
To assist in working with a block of InstId that are type values, two
additional helpers are added to the TypeStore:
- GetBlockAsTypeInstIds which turns an `ArrayRef<InstId>` into a range
of `TypeInstId`
- GetBlockAsTypeIds which turns an `ArrayRef<InstId>` into a range of
`TypeId`
We use these helpers in places that iterate over the
`TupleType::type_elements_id`.
In preparation for shifting from `TypeId`s potentially representing
attached types to always representing unattached types, using
[terminology suggested on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/963846118964350976/1359286326779973712).
This change causes us to track slightly more type spelling information
through SemIR.
One change that has significant impact on the SemIR output is that we
now build a `struct_type` instruction in each class representing the
types of the fields, including the spelling used for those types. This
is now no longer always identical to the corresponding canonical
`struct_type` for the object representation, so it's built separately
and owned by the class.
Also remove `TypeBlock` support entirely, as its only use was
representing `TupleType`s, which now use an `InstBlock`.
Each of these types takes another type as an operand. Instead of storing
that other type as a `TypeId`, store it as an `InstId` so that we can
track how it was written, not only its canonical form.
The canonical constant values of these types continue to store the
canonical constant values of their operands, as normal.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Reduce usage of `GetConstantInSpecific` to a single caller in constant
evaluation, with a TODO to remove that.
This gets us closer to being able to fully perform type-checking against
abstract types instead of types anchored within a particular generic.
Fixes#5186
With @zygoloid's kind assistance, this generalizes the existing
non-const lowering of ClassInit, that had previously only handled
InitializeFrom, to find other cases - such as a nested ClassInit used to
initialize a class member.
This refactors the `FindReturnSlotArgForInitializer` from
`check/convert.cpp` into `sem_ir/file.{h,cpp}` for use from lowering
(since lower doesn't depend on check, which I assume is an intentional
layering constraint - so figured it made sense to move it to sem_ir, and
found one or two similar-ish utility functions in `sem_ir/file.{h,cpp}`,
so figured that was a good spot)
What this does:
- Adds tracking where storage is allocated.
- Determines if that storage supports destruction and, if so, records
the `destroy` function for it.
- Calls any found `destroy` functions when going out-of-scope.
What this does not do:
- Precise scope tracking of temporaries. We currently don't define
temporary scopes, which would probably be the solution.
- Destruction for anything but a `class` with `fn destroy`, in an
implicit return. That excludes:
- Classes with members that need destruction, particularly in the
absence of `fn destroy`.
- Structs, tuples, and arrays.
- Explicit returns, break, continue, nested scopes.
Noting the exclusions in particular, I think those will need work to
support, but this should set the right framework.
The cleanup block concept stems from clang and trying to share code
across cleanups, from discussion with chandlerc. Note in this
implementation I try to find `destroy` functions early on: that's so
that, when destruction is present on multiple paths, particularly
non-shared paths, we only bind the `destroy` method once.
Implementation-wise, I'll note this adds a `has_cleanup` flag to
`TemporaryStorage` and `VarStorage`. There are several related options,
but this felt similar to other information we're trying to track on
instructions. My goal with this is to mitigate the chance of accidental
calls where the storage may not be tracked for destruction. Alternatives
I considered were to not add the flag (I was worried about heightened
risk of errors), or to just add a concept for the relevant `requires`
(which just felt inconsistent).
Cleanup logic ends up in control_flow in this change because I thought
it was a reasonably consistent place for the cleanup block concept and
its pretty direct control flow interactions.
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
- Explicitly document that `*Param` and `*ParamPattern` insts represent
`Call` parameters.
- Stop wrapping compile-time parameter patterns in `ValueParamPattern`
insts (because they aren't `Call` parameters).
- Document how `MatchContext::results_` relates to the `Call`
parameters, and be more consistent about when it's written to.
- Remove `RuntimeParamIndex::Unknown`: we no longer need to distinguish
"this `Param`'s runtime index is unknown" from "this `Param` isn't a
runtime param", because we no longer use `Param`s at all in the latter
case.
- Rename `RuntimeParamIndex` to `CallParamIndex`.
As a side effect of removing the `ValueParamPattern` insts, this fixes a
minor diagnostic bug where `NoteInitializingParam` didn't identify the
specific parameter that led to a deduction failure, because it expects
generic parameters to only be represented by `SymbolicBindingPattern`s,
but before this change they could be wrapped in `ValueParamPattern`s.
Parameter lists need substantially different treatment than tuple
patterns in other contexts, so this change splits them into separate
parse node kinds.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This in particular uses free functions because it's likely to end up
more consistent with types (versus a wrapper object for InstStore).
Note, this is unlikely to have a performance impact, but if it does, we
can look into related approaches (and we've already discussed using
LTO).
Renames `PendingBlock::AddInst` to `PendingBlock::Add` because
`MakeElementAccessInst` expects the matching name to exist.
This creates a new check/type.h for most logic, and also moves some
functions to TypeStore in sem_ir/type.h. My approach for TypeStore is to
focus on moving the read-only functions there.
Richard Smith
Dana Jansens
Geoff Romer
Thomas Köppe
David Blaikie