Undoes a chunk of #4125 because nobody's really in favor of keeping the
formatting, and it's occasionally caused a crash in Formatter to
dominate output (and even when working, it can be verbose; the source
location in (5) is often more helpful).
Basically goes back to:
```
4. Check::Context
NodeStack:
0. LetIntroducer: no value
1. BindingPattern: inst+15
2. LetInitializer: no value
3. StructLiteralStart: no value
inst_block_stack_:
0. block<invalid> {inst+0, inst+1, inst+6, inst+7, inst+8, inst+9, inst+10, inst+11, inst+12}
1. global_init {}
pattern_block_stack_:
0. block<invalid> {}
param_and_arg_refs_stack:
0. block<invalid> {}
args_type_info_stack_:
0. block<invalid> {}
5. alias_of_alias.carbon:15:12: checking StructLiteral
let d: c = {};
^~
```
Fixes#4145
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes crash messages to start printing verbose forms of instructions,
rather than just the ID. Fixes some indentation issues with stacks. Also
switches unexpected inst formatting, because now there are lots, and
it'd be helpful to know where they are.
This uses a pimpl pattern for Formatter due to the number of member
functions on Formatter. Maybe we should refactor that, but this didn't
feel like a good place to do so.
Note, I have two concerns about this change... to note them here, to
make sure others are considering them when evaluating the
implementation:
1. Some instructions are very verbose to print, as evidenced by the
fn_decl printing (which includes function params) or scope printing
(which includes scope members).
- I'm not sure whether there's a way to simply reduce this, as it seems
essential to the requested printing of instructions.
- Long-term, we may at least want to limit the number of lines printed
here. However, I've already spent a fair amount of time here and I think
it's in a good state to evaluate.
2. Increased complexity in the crash handler may result in crash
messages failing to generate.
- For example, a crash in Formatter (and its deps, such as InstNamer or
location handling) prevents a stack from being printed. I'm pretty sure
I've written crashes in Formatter before.
Here's an example crash snippet (generated by adding a crash inside
`return` handling) before:
```
2. NodeStack:
0. FunctionDefinitionStart -> function2
1. ReturnStatementStart -> no value
2. IntLiteral -> inst+26
inst_block_stack_:
0. block<invalid> {inst+0, inst+1, inst+2, inst+23}
1. block9 {inst+26}
param_and_arg_refs_stack:
args_type_info_stack_:
```
And after:
```
2. Check::Context
NodeStack:
0. FunctionDefinitionStart: function2
1. ReturnStatementStart: no value
2. IntLiteral:
unexpected.inst+26.loc12_10: i32 = int_literal 0 [template = constants.%.2]
inst_block_stack_:
0. block<invalid> {
package: <namespace> = namespace [template] {
.Core = unexpected.inst+2
.F = unexpected.inst+23.loc11_22
}
unexpected.inst+1 = import Core
unexpected.inst+2: <namespace> = namespace unexpected.inst+1, [template] {}
unexpected.inst+23.loc11_22: %F.type = fn_decl @F [template = constants.%F] {
unexpected.inst+9.loc11_9: init type = call constants.%Bool() [template = bool]
unexpected.inst+10.loc11_9: type = value_of_initializer unexpected.inst+9.loc11_9 [template = bool]
unexpected.inst+11.loc11_9: type = converted unexpected.inst+9.loc11_9, unexpected.inst+10.loc11_9 [template = bool]
unexpected.inst+12.loc11_6: bool = param b
@F.%b: bool = bind_name b, unexpected.inst+12.loc11_6
unexpected.inst+19.loc11_18: init type = call constants.%Int32() [template = i32]
unexpected.inst+20.loc11_18: type = value_of_initializer unexpected.inst+19.loc11_18 [template = i32]
unexpected.inst+21.loc11_18: type = converted unexpected.inst+19.loc11_18, unexpected.inst+20.loc11_18 [template = i32]
@F.%return: ref i32 = var <return slot>
}
}
1. block9 {
unexpected.inst+26.loc12_10: i32 = int_literal 0 [template = constants.%.2]
}
param_and_arg_refs_stack:
args_type_info_stack_:
```
The use of ArrayStack here is intended to simplify the logic, and also
make better use of the inst heap allocations. Prior changes #4101 and
#4103 removed the less related logic from InstBlockStack, although #4103
is the actual part that blocked using ArrayStack.
BTW, note the PrintForStackDump implementation was incorrect because it
didn't apply size_. This simplification fixes the issue.
Creates a `GlobalInit` class for storing relevant values, pulling
functions off `InstBlockStack` and `Context`. Adds a `Context` pointer
just so that it doesn't need to be passed in on each call (`Finalize` in
particular uses several members).
Note we have several different `InstBlockStack` instances, so several
copies of the relevant members were simply unused.
`GlobalInit` block is now static block within a `SemIR` which will be
used to emit initialization instructions for variables in the `Package`
scope.
inst_block_stack now has additional methods to handle `GlobalInit` block
separately, this block can be popped without being finalized allowing to
accumulate between all instances of variables.
At the end of the `check` phase, if this block is not empty , the
function `__global_init` will be added with this block being inserted
into it.
This block is pushed to `inst_block_scope` at the end `BindName`,
allowing instruction to be emitted into it, then popped at the semicolon
(VariableDecl).
This significantly changes the `SemIR` output, that's why this commit
updates a lot of the test cases.
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.
This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Gıyaseddin Tanrıkulu