Commit Graph
128 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth 8be274cf60 Replace :! binding syntax with phase keywords and contextual defaults (#7479)
Implement the toolchain side of proposal #7254, removing the `:!`
binding
syntax for generic and template parameters in favor of the keywords
`generic`,
`template`, and `runtime` plus contextual defaults for phase.

For valid programs this is semantics-preserving: each binding resolves
to the
same phase, and produces the same SemIR, as it did under `:!`/`:`. The
parser
derives a binding's phase from its syntactic context plus any explicit
phase
keyword; new diagnostics and error recovery for misused keywords are
described
below.

Implementation details for each component:

- Lexer: remove the `:!` (`ColonExclaim`) token, move its virtual
parse-node
  budget onto `:`, and add the `generic` and `runtime` keywords.
- Parser: thread a `BindingContext` (`ExplicitParam`, `DeducedParam`, or
`CompileTimeEntityParam`) from declaration introducers down through
parameter
lists to each binding pattern, using a one-token lookahead to
distinguish a
name-qualifier parameter list from a declaration's own final list.
Parameters
of a compile-time entity (`class`, `interface`, `constraint`, `choice`,
`alias`, `export`, `namespace`) and deduced `[]` parameters default to
checked
generic; explicit function parameters and local bindings default to
runtime.
`HandleBindingPattern` resolves the phase from that context plus the
keyword: a
`generic` keyword needs no node of its own (the phase is carried by the
  binding's node kind), while a `runtime` keyword is preserved as a
`RuntimeBindingName` node so `check` can name it in a diagnostic. A
phase
keyword that is merely redundant with the contextual default is
diagnosed
  here, without invalidating the parse tree.
- Check: a phase keyword that is invalid for its context (for example
`runtime`
on a checked-generic parameter) is diagnosed here, and recovers by
building an
error binding that still introduces the name so that later uses of it do
not
  produce cascading errors.

The removed `:!` syntax is now rejected as an ordinary parse error.

The `form`/`:?`/`->?` ("extended types") portion of proposal #7254 is
left for a
separate change.

Assisted-by: Claude Code
2026-07-11 01:22:44 +00:00
Dana Jansens 11901b1a59 Parse match_first blocks (#7478)
`match_first` is a declaration followed by a curly-brace block of
declarations.

The check phase will ensure only impl decls (or defns) are inside the
block.
2026-07-09 15:34:52 +00:00
Özgür T. ÖnsoyandDana Jansens 08385adeb5 Implement checking observe declarations (#6709)
This adds SemIR structs and implements building `observe` lists, as well
as naming, formatting, and importing `observe` declarations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
2026-07-08 17:07:10 +00:00
Geoff Romer 1a3966d2c4 Build VarStorage insts more efficiently. (#7422)
Instead of traversing the entire pattern block looking for
`VarPattern`s, we keep track of them on creation, and then build
`VarStorage`s directly from that list.

This also gets rid of the global `var_storage_map`, and instead keep
that information narrowly scoped to each full-pattern, and consume it in
a single linear traversal instead of with random-access lookups. To
enable that, this fixes a parse bug where nested `var` patterns were
getting diagnosed but not marked as errors.
2026-06-26 22:26:13 +00:00
Nicholas Bishop bd918fb33b Parse vars in classes the same as vars in other locations (#7188)
Class vars are still restricted to simple `name: type` bindings, not
full patterns. This is now handled in the check phase instead of during
parsing.

This is in preparation for supporting `static var`.
2026-05-13 21:22:46 +00:00
Dana Jansens 6776e2b804 Detect impl redecls in non-declarative scopes (#7170)
Avoid crashing on the fact that block scopes have no related InstId. So
we can't push the InstId of the current scope in the ImplIntroducer
node, as it can be None. Instead we have to find the parent InstId when
we're building the ImplDecl, because the ImplDecl has a node at the top
of the scope stack for the DeclNameStack.

Impls are allowed in sequential (non-declarative) scopes (functions,
blocks), but [redeclarations are not
allowed](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/db24042fe56d22275aa801696e2f8f5c4171e35b/proposals/p3763.md?plain=1#L279).
We now diagnose these redecls as invalid.
2026-05-07 13:44:40 +00:00
Dana Jansens f8dd4d85bf Do not treat impls in different scopes as redeclarations (#7161)
An impl in a different scope, with the same parameters, will overlap and
get diagnosed for that later by the [prioritization
rule](https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/design/generics/details.html#prioritization-rule),
if they are not in a match_first block. But they are not considered as
redeclarations.

See [proposal
p5366](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/62b94f79322039acc3fc8e175896a64a32df470e/proposals/p5366.md)
for the rule.
2026-05-04 19:11:51 +00:00
Dana Jansens 46bb0fecd4 Properly diagnose ambiguous .Self in T impls X where... (#7132)
A `where` expression nested inside a `T impls X` constraint makes
`.Self` ambiguous on the right-hand side of the `where` if `T` is
anything other than `.Self`. After the `where`, the value of a `.Self`
could be `T` or could be the value of `.Self` before the `impls`
constraint: the so-called top-level value of `.Self`.

Implicit use of `.Self` in designators is always allowed, and they are
bound (and replaced by a reference) to the inner-most possible value of
`.Self`. On the right-hand side of the nested `where` above, they have
the value `T as X`.

`.Self impls ...` is also always allowed, since it acts more as a
keyword here, and it always refers to the inner-most possible value of
`.Self`.

Any other explicit use of `.Self` is diagnosed when ambiguous, in any
kind of constraint. This is done in the handling of `WhereExpr` since it
has enough context to allow `.Self impls` (which is an explicit use)
while disallowing other explicit uses. And because it has non-canonical
instructions to work with, so it is able to diagnose errors with precise
locations.

Since `.Self` is no longer going to be marked with depth modifiers, the
eval of `WhereExpr` does not need an input facet value instruction
representing `.Self` to compare with, as they are now going to all be
equivalent. So revert it back to just looking for the `PeriodSelf` name
id, through a shared helper being introduced as `IsPeriodSelf`. And drop
the period self InstId from the `WhereExpr` instruction. This causes
most of the formatted SemIR changes.

Move helpers for working with and replacing `.Self` to their own file,
out of the `facet_type.h` header/cpp files. These are working with
`.Self` facet values more than facet types, though `.Self` is a name
that only exists inside the scope of a facet type.
2026-05-01 21:22:32 +00:00
Geoff RomerandChandler Carruth 49c7288619 Restructure return declaration handling (#7076)
- A function with a return declaration always has exactly one
`ReturnSlotPattern`, representing the whole return declaration (whereas
previously that was omitted for value and reference returns).
- The `ReturnSlotPattern` always has a subpattern with the same form.
`OutParamPattern` already plays that role for initializing forms, and
`TuplePattern` will play that role for tuple forms. This change
introduces `ValueReturnPattern` and `RefReturnPattern` to represent
value and reference return forms.
- As before, the `ReturnSlotPattern` has a corresponding `ReturnSlot`
that represents the output that is initialized by a `return` statement.
Its structure parallels the structure of the `ReturnSlotPattern`, so we
need `ValueReturn` and `RefReturn` insts that correspond to
`ValueReturnPattern` and `RefReturnPattern`.

This is a step toward supporting generic return forms, where the
`ReturnSlotPattern`'s subpattern may be an action: this change ensures
that evaluating the action for a specific form produces the same SemIR
as if the form were concrete to begin with. More speculatively, this
should simplify the implementation of `return` statements with compound
return forms.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2026-04-22 23:38:21 +00:00
Richard Smith 8b59e85b16 Add support for inline Cpp declarations. (#6994)
For #6830, add support for inline C++ fragments as a declaration rather
than as a packaging directive. For now, this uses `inline Cpp
<string-literal>;` as syntax. The prior `import Cpp inline
<string-literal>;` is left alone for the time being. We can decide
separately whether to remove that.

`inline Cpp` requires that there was at least one `import Cpp`. It's not
clear to me if that's the right design long-term, but it seems
reasonable for now.

Assisted-by: Gemini via Google Antigravity
2026-03-31 22:27:43 +00:00
Richard Smith 99bde2acb3 Refactor match parse nodes. (#6870)
Use the same node kind for the body of `case` and `default` handlers. We
don't need to distinguish these in check, so don't create extra node
kinds for them.

In order to make the nodes properly delimited, make the label (`case
...` or `default`) nodes be children of the `=>` node rather than
siblings. This allows us to use the node kind of the `=>` as the
bracketing node for the complete handler, rather than having two
different bracketing node kinds, one for each kind of label.
2026-03-10 20:04:28 +00:00
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins 18cfeb7476 Add support for ->? return forms (#6849)
This includes checking and lowering for concrete form literals. Support
for symbolic forms is future work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2026-03-09 22:30:16 +00:00
Özgür d11ee4b2b1 Implement parsing observe declarations (#6674)
This implements parsing of the
[`observe`](https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/design/generics/details.html#observing-a-type-implements-an-interface)
declarations.

- Added states and node kinds.
- Added node categories.
- Added a diagnostic for invalid keywords/operators.
- Implemented parser state handlers.
- Added structs to `typed_nodes.h`.
- Added parser tests.
2026-02-26 19:21:19 +00:00
Geoff Romer 7938d9a8d0 Lex/parse support for ->?, :?, and form literals (#6695)
See #5389 (pending) for the language design.
2026-02-07 02:41:22 +00:00
Burak Emir 80639a02f0 [parse] Implement initial parsing support for Lambda expressions (#6583)
This adds the necessary parser infrastructure to recognize and parse
lambda expressions in Carbon.

Key changes:
- Added  and  Parse Node Kinds.
- Updated  to use  to accommodate the growing number of node kinds.
- Implemented parser states and handlers for lambda syntax ( or ).
- Added  structure to .
- Added diagnostics for missing lambda bodies.
- Added a stub in  phase to defer semantic analysis using .
- Added parser tests for lambdas.
2026-01-14 16:58:15 +00:00
Geoff Romer 505b1c86b9 Initial support for return forms (#6556)
The main changes here are:
- Introducing `InitForm` and `RefForm` to represent initializing and
reference forms (the two return forms currently supported by the
parser).
- Introducing the `FormType` singleton inst to represent their type
(i.e. `Core.Form`).
- Emitting an inst representing a function's declared return form as
part of handling the function signature.

The return form inst is currently ignored. Subsequent PRs will expose it
in `SemIR::Function` and use it to determine the form of call
expressions.
2026-01-07 00:54:18 +00:00
Geoff Romer bf45b1cbf5 Refactor function return type representation (#6463)
This separates the return type from the return pattern, and replaces the
return pattern with a block of return patterns. This is a step toward
support for `ref` returns (where there's no corresponding return
pattern) and compund-form returns (where there may be multiple return
patterns).
2025-12-10 18:34:23 +00:00
Richard Smith b300f36e6f Use inline constexpr where appropriate. (#6374)
This fixes various violations of C++'s One Definition Rule, where we
accidentally gave the same static data member multiple definitions in
different translation units. Clang happens to emit such definitions with
weak linkage, which allows us to get away with this without link errors,
but it's still formally incorrect.

Also switch keyword order around for a handful of instances of
`constexpr inline`, per agreement in open discussion.

This happens to reduce the size of a `-c dbg` toolchain binary by 7.2
MiB, presumably by making more of our symbols and especially debug info
discardable.
2025-11-14 13:50:56 +00:00
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith 43ffd721a4 Support ref tags on arguments to ref params (#6312)
The issue of whether/how to include `ref` tags in the textual and
in-memory SemIR (see discussion
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1431316355742961805))
is left as future work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2025-11-11 20:30:19 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandDana Jansens 8166f9a7cf Formalize Cpp as a PackageNameId (#6306)
This turns `Cpp` into a keyword, and makes it map to `NameId::Cpp` and
`PackageNameId::Cpp`.

Per discussion with zygoloid, the keyword versus identifier question is
deliberately kept open by #4846. This PR switches to a keyword because
mapping to a specific `PackageNameId` works best with a special `NameId`
not backed by an `IdentifierId`. We could in theory make it work using
`IdentifierId` or a runtime-tracked `PackageNameId` for `Cpp` (e.g.
stored on `SemIR::File`), but this approach is consistent with `Core`
and so seemed like a good starting point.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
2025-11-05 17:21:41 +00:00
Dana Jansens 43e09e8e81 Type-check require declarations (#6286)
They don't get stored anywhere yet, but this type checks the
declarations and diagnoses errors in their form, such as not placing a
facet type after `impls` or a type before it.
2025-10-31 20:20:31 +00:00
Geoff Romer 4821eec2f8 Add support for ref patterns (#6283)
Support for `bound`, and for the `ref` tag on arguments, is left as
future work.
2025-10-29 16:28:56 +00:00
Dana Jansens 26381f6eaf Handle parsing of require...impls declarations (#6255)
Check is not implemented yet, but some tests are added.
2025-10-23 18:34:52 +00:00
Dana Jansens 22580a47d3 Initial support for empty named constraints (#6245)
Type check named constraint decls and definitions. We don't correctly
error if you put a `fn` inside them. There is no support for `require`
or `alias` yet, so there's nothing useful you can do with them yet.

We have attempted to share code between `interface` and `constraint` as
they are quite similar. First by splitting out some of
handle_interface.cpp to a separate file. Second by sharing some code
paths when you want a facet type from either one, as they both turn into
a facet type.
2025-10-22 18:26:32 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 705c95d6e0 Drop fn destroy support (#6136)
`fn destroy` is being removed per decision on #6124. It seems like the
relevant decision will result in no more keyword-based function names,
so this is removing all related support.
2025-09-25 21:56:48 +00:00
Elliott Kalt 58de34e534 Decouple associated constants from let (#5973)
Decouples associated constants from being special cased in let handlers.
Enforces associated constant grammar restrictions in parsing instead of
checking.

Closes #5411
2025-09-02 23:15:26 +00:00
Dana JansensandJon Ross-Perkins 4b0e2b03b6 Add the .Self name for the type expression of a compile time binding (#5937)
We add a virtual node (`CompileTimeBindingPatternStart`) as the first
child of `CompileTimeBindingPattern` which holds the identifier
underneath it, so that it is checked just before the type expression of
the `CompileTimeBindingPattern`. When we reach this virtual node during
check, we add `.Self` as a name in the current scope, and when we reach
`CompileTimeBindingPattern` we remove it from scope, which ensures it's
present during only the checking of the type expression for the compile
time pattern.

At the moment the `.Self` has a different type (it's a `TypeType`) than
other `.Self` in the facet type (which are a single `FacetType`), but
the intention is to immediately substitute it out of the facet type
entirely, replacing it with a reference to the compile time binding (a
`BindSymbolicName`) itself. A TODO has been added for this.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-08-12 16:27:07 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 7cac77119c Support import Cpp inline "some code";. (#5904)
This adds support for importing C++ code directly from source rather
than via a `#include`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-08-05 23:03:32 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 866794b82a Check and lowering support for for loops. (#5698)
Add check support for `for` loops following #1885. This also adds a
basic `Optional` type to the prelude, as that's necessary to support the
new `Iterate` interface.

Depends on #5688, #5697. Those PRs aren't stacked here, but this change
will crash until they land.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-06-25 23:45:14 +00:00
Geoff Romerandjosh11b f5b5731c76 Separate fields from other var decls in parse (#5320)
This enables us to decouple class fields from pattern matching.

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-04-22 17:15:53 +00:00
Dana Jansens f0663715dd Even more usage of TypeInstId (#5296)
Use TypeInstId in many more places where the instruction is required
to/known to always be a type value. This should be a somewhat exhaustive
set of places, as it covers all instructions given to
GetTypeIdFromTypeInstId().

The things of interest here are:

- Singleton instructions are always of type TypeType, so they are now
TypeInstIds.
- ErrorInst::SingletonInstId gets upcast to be an InstId because it's
sometimes used to define the type of a variable (as in `auto inst_id =
SemIR::ErrorInst::SingletonInstId;` that may hold other InstIds.
- Parse nodes don't really know about TypeInstId, so NodeStack::Push
needs to do some special casing to avoid CHECK failures when given a
TypeInstId but expecting an InstId. We leave a TODO behind here because
the nodes which are being pushed a TypeInstId should probably be taught
to expect that, but such a change is a bit tricky, so too much for this
PR.
2025-04-11 21:47:43 +00:00
Dana JansensandRichard Smith cf57c85545 Introduce TypeInstId (#5288)
TypeInstId is an InstId whose constant value has a type of TypeType.
This includes:
- Type value instructions, the `ClassType` or `IntLiteralType`
instructions.
- Constraint value instructions, which are the `FacetType` and
`TypeType` instructions, each of which also have type TypeType.

TypeInstId encodes in the type system that it is safe to convert the
instruction's value to a TypeId, and CHECKs at construction that this
invariant is maintained.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2025-04-10 22:59:02 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 21687e8cb1 Fix use of keyword names in qualifiers with params (#5130)
This is a crash bug, since NameQualifierWithParams needs a specific open
kind. I'd missed that this wasn't actually tested.
2025-03-14 20:16:01 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins e6872f9499 Change NodeIdOneOf and similar to use "requires" and explicit UnsafeMake (#5084)
This doesn't change functionality, but I was seeing better diagnostics
in VS Code.

This also changes the NodeId constructors for related types (also
NodeCategory and NodeIdForKind) to use UnsafeMake for construction. That
originated from avoiding ambiguity coming from `requires`, but the
constructor mode is also one we should typically avoid (e.g., preferring
`Parse::Tree::As`).
2025-03-12 00:33:54 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkinsandjosh11b c44e688e5d Add parsing for 'fn destroy' (#5045)
Syntax is proposed in #5017, but has already been discussed with leads.
Semantics is left as a TODO.

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-03 17:37:10 +00:00
Dana Jansensandzygoloid 24bde46181 Change array syntax from [T; N] to array(T, N) (#4981)
In line with the proposal in #4682, this changes the array syntax to be
array(T, N). `array` is a builtin keyword which must be followed by
parens containing two expressions and a separating comma.

The array type expression is still fully builtin, it does not forward to
a Core.Array library type yet. It merely adds the `ArrayType`
instruction, as was done with the previous syntax.

Followup work will change the instruction to reference to Core.Array,
once the library type exists and can be used directly.

---------

Co-authored-by: zygoloid <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2025-02-20 22:42:47 +00:00
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins 74e1a9949f Support tuple patterns outside parameter lists (#4923)
Parameter lists need substantially different treatment than tuple
patterns in other contexts, so this change splits them into separate
parse node kinds.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-02-20 03:17:45 +00:00
Dana Jansens 3f01310039 Make choice work for alternatives without parameters (#4815)
This adds support for choice types at a similar level to that of a C
enum, where each alternative has a name but no additional
data/parameters attached to it. We generate a TODO diagnostic if
parameters are specified.

Because there's no extra data, the storage is a simple unsigned integer
discriminant of the smallest possible size.

A choice without any alternatives is not constructible. A choice with a
single alternative is, and has an empty tuple in place of a discriminant
since it has only one state. The empty tuple is used to make the class
non-constructible. This can be improved.

Each alternative is turned into a let binding on the choice that is a
value of the choice with that alternative set as the active one in the
discriminant. This isn't possible to write in user code with a class
right now, since the let binding has the same type as the choice
(which is a class) it is within. It's possible to generate it in semir
however by adding the binding after the class is marked complete.
2025-02-19 16:37:36 +00:00
Richard Smith 6dda094928 Superficial support for template modifier on symbolic bindings. (#4948)
Change parse tree from `template (T:! type)` to `(template T):! type`,
so that we have information about whether a binding is a template
binding available when forming the representation of the binding
pattern. This incidentally fixes a bug that we would accept `template
addr A:! B` instead of the intended `addr template A:! B`.

Track whether a symbolic binding is a template binding on the
`EntityName` object. I'm borrowing a bit from the `CompileTimeBindIndex`
for this in order to avoid making `EntityName`s larger. Longer-term, we
should think about using a different representation for symbolic
bindings, to avoid including these fields in all `EntityName`s, but
that's out of scope for this change.

So far, template bindings are treated as having the same phase as
checked bindings, but that will change in a future PR.
2025-02-13 02:15:22 +00:00
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins f502e8d6ff Avoid speculatively pushing a pattern block in impl handling (#4943)
To do this, we restructure the parse tree to make `forall` a leaf node
that comes before the parameter list.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-02-12 23:21:57 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 8eb4e24cb6 Implement #4864: Core is a keyword (#4909)
Change representation of package names from `IdentifierId` to
`PackageNameId`, and add a special value `PackageNameId::Core` for the
Core package. Add a `Core` expression to name the Core package, and
support for parsing the `Core` keyword in `package` and `import`
declarations.

For now, I've made no changes to instruction fingerprinting or name
mangling. This means that fingerprints and mangled names will collide
between names in the `Core` package and names in a `r#Core` package. See
#4908.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-02-11 21:33:57 +00:00
Richard Smith 1917ea223e Avoid redundantly specifying Id::Kind. (#4911)
When a node kind's Id::Kind is determined from its category, don't also
require it to be listed in the switch over all node kinds. This was both
redundant and also error prone -- and in practice for several node
kinds, the Id::Kind computed in the two different ways was different.

Instead, have the switch over node kinds handle only special cases that
can't be handled by their category, and enforce that each node kind has
an Id::Kind specified in exactly one way via checks in the .cpp file.

This refines the previous change in #4280 -- we still get the improved
errors for missing updates, but now also don't require redundant
additions to the switch.
2025-02-07 22:35:18 +00:00
Richard Smith 5f888e1124 Treat associated constants as entities parameterized by Self (#4837)
Add a full entity representation for associated constants, and build a
`Generic` object for them. This `Generic` is parameterized by the
enclosing `Self` type, allowing the use of `Self` within the type of the
associated constant to be supported.

When performing impl lookup for an associated constant, produce the type
with the provided self type substituted for its `Self` along with any
generic parameters of the interface.

Split the handling of associated constant declarations into two parts,
corresponding to the code before the `=`, and the code between the `=`
and `;` (if any). The former goes into the generic declaration region;
the latter into the generic definition region. This prepares us to
handle the default value for an associated constant, but for now we're
just storing the information and not actually using it.

Remove the entity type field from `assoc_entity_type`, because it's
almost unused and is an attractive nuisance -- it must necessarily be a
type in the generic scope of the associated constant rather than in the
scope of the instruction (because there is no `Self` anywhere else),
which means that it's hard to substitute into or derive meaning from.

See `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/assoc_const_self.carbon` for tests of
the new functionality; these used to cause the toolchain to crash.
2025-01-25 02:13:52 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 9c0faf007e Invalid comment cleanup (#4836)
This is a followup from #4834, I searched for "invalid" uses in our
codebase. This is mostly changing comments, and a couple debug
functions, but shouldn't affect testable behavior.

Note a couple things I'll highlight as not changing (but could) are:
- `ReturnTypeInfo::is_valid`
- `"invalid"` uses in the formatter
- `AddInvalid` for `!has_value` in `inst_fingerprinter` (because the
cases it's called sound invalid-ish)
2025-01-23 02:21:48 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 6b5eb1a101 Id::Invalid -> Id::None (#4834)
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.

Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).

I've tried to sequence commits here:

1. Automatic replacements:

- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
  - `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
  - `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
  - `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
  - `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`

2. Manual edits:

  - In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
    - `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
    - Manual edits to comments in this file.
  - `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
  - In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
    - `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
    - Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
    - Various mentions of "valid" in comments
  - In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
  - Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.

3. Autoupdate tests

4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)

5. Comment spot checks

Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
2025-01-22 23:15:00 +00:00
Geoff Romer 943acf1ec2 Separate node kind for bindings inside var (#4822)
This is a step toward making binding pattern handling more robust, by
removing its reliance on the node stack for context.
2025-01-21 20:15:19 +00:00
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith 13434f0e8a Model var as a pattern operator (#4720)
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2025-01-17 17:51:34 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins f7269482fe Remove node_stack Peek templating where possible (#4801)
The "templated for consistency" variants felt a little confusing when I
was working on #4795, so suggesting to remove templating where it's not
helpful to instantiate (particularly when there were both templated and
non-templated variants). Note this leaves a `PeekIs<IdT>` because
there's indirection there, but that's more the exception than the rule.
2025-01-15 22:12:22 +00:00
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins 4f10735751 Track params in the parser (#4777)
This change splits `NodeKind::IdentifierName` into separate node kinds
depending on whether the identifier is followed by parameters, and
similarly splits `NameQualifier` based on whether the qualifier has
parameters. This enables us to only push a pattern block when it's
actually needed, rather than "defensively" pushing one when it might be
needed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-01-10 22:11:07 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins cb4686bf21 Enable misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes and adjust style to match (#4702)
Pursuant to discussion regarding #4699, turn on
`misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes` using the
`IgnoreClassesWithAllMemberVariablesBeingPublic` flag (the check treats
structs as classes, so we need this for structs with all-public
members). Updates the style guide notes to match, which should be pretty
minor due to the scoping of test fixtures.

Also fixes some underscore uses in test files on the way. Basically this
is keeping the style for [class data member
naming](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Variable_Names)
even while making them public.
2024-12-19 00:31:41 +00:00