Commit Graph
22 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
josh11bandJosh L 832d46f01b Update LLVM (#7221)
Assisted-by: Google Antigravity

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-18 17:06:58 +00:00
Richard Smith 71ba07239f Support pass-by-move when calling a C++ function taking by value. (#7135)
Previously, we picked a single Carbon parameter pattern for each C++
parameter pattern. This doesn't work well in cases where the Carbon
semantics and the C++ semantics are not perfectly aligned. In
particular, when a parameter is passed by value in C++, that might mean
either pass-by-move (which in Carbon would best be modeled by a `var`
pattern, as no other form of parameter would perform a move) or
pass-by-copy (which in Carbon would best be modeled by a value
parameter, as a `var` parameter would force an extra copy).

After this change, we compute a passing mode for each parameter based on
the implicit conversion sequence from the argument to the parameter as
determined by C++ overload resolution, and use that to determine the
Carbon pattern corresponding to each C++ parameter. This results in
potentially generating multiple different thunks for the same C++
function if it's called in different ways, but we already did that to
handle default arguments and list-initialization. The passing modes are
included in the thunk mangling.

Add a new value store for clang decl signatures, which capture the
information about parameter passing mode as well as the other existing
information about different ways that a C++ function might be imported
to Carbon.

Most of the rules for computing passing modes are the same as before:
const references use pass by value, non-const lvalue references use
pass-by-ref, non-const rvalue references use pass-by-var. But for C++
non-reference parameters, pick between pass-by-value and pass-by-var
based on whether the implicit conversion sequence was effectively
performing a copy. Prefer pass-by-value if either would work and they'd
do the same thing. We still use pass-by-value for const references, even
when the argument is an lvalue and we could pass a reference; we may
want to change this in future.

For virtual functions, we try to pick a worst-case passing mode, as we
can only pick a single signature for what goes in the vtable. Calls to
virtual functions will still use a thunk to C++, allowing variance in
the calling convention at call sites. We don't allow variance in the
overriders as we don't implement support for thunks for virtual
functions yet. We currently use pass-by-value for const reference
parameters here, but that should probably change at some point.

Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
2026-05-13 01:44:07 +00:00
Richard Smith bc06f6c5ec Mangle the signature decl when mangling a thunk. (#7177)
Fixes mangling collisions when two thunks with the same name (eg, `Op`)
are created in the same context, which in turn would lead to LLVM
verifier failures and miscompiles.

To support this, add a new value store to track a little more
information about thunks beyond what's in the `Function`.
2026-05-07 21:58:29 +00:00
Dana Jansens 554b1b8d10 Remove SymbolicBindingType (#7114)
This inst was meant to support tracking the depth of a `.Self` facet,
but we have now implemented substitution of `.Self` in facet type
identification, and in eval of where expressions, without needing to
track the depth.

See history here:
-
[2025-06-30](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yt-i5AmF76LSvD4TrWRIAE_92kii6j5yFiW-S7ahzlg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.4qd5dkyfn2k3)
-
[2025-07-07](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yt-i5AmF76LSvD4TrWRIAE_92kii6j5yFiW-S7ahzlg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.7urbxcq23olv)
- #6026
2026-04-27 19:04:59 +00:00
Richard Smith be0c07dc7e Give Carbon -> C++ thunks internal linkage. (#7040)
Also declare them `inline` since we're putting the `always_inline`
attribute on them. Use the `internal_linkage` attribute rather than
`SC_Static` since it's a more precise mechanism and matches what we do
for static member functions in reverse interop (where `SC_Static` means
something else and would not give the function internal linkage).
2026-04-08 21:14:30 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkinsandjonmeow 9266ced4e3 Improve CanDestroyType to handle remaining cases (#6943)
This is only fixing the decision about *whether* to produce a witness.
Implementation of the witness is still a TODO, though where a body is
generated, it should also precisely reflect where one _needs_ to be
generated.

Note the tests:

- toolchain/lower/testdata/function/generic/import_core_witness.carbon
- toolchain/lower/testdata/function/generic/import_unused_def.carbon

These tests can probably be produced _without_ Core.Destroy, but I found
the essence of them while trying to build //examples with Core.Destroy
and a simpler minimization wasn't striking me.

Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini

---------

Co-authored-by: jonmeow <jperkins@google.com>
2026-04-02 22:54:58 +00:00
Richard Smith dfac728571 Fix pointer sizes in debug info. (#7002)
The size is in bits, so 8 is an unlikely value. Also, don't hardcode a
size, ask the data layout for it.
2026-04-01 16:35:12 +00:00
Nicholas Bishop bf6a14ac39 Support Temporary constants (#6983)
Evaluate `Temporary` constants to a `Temporary` with the `storage` field
set to `None`.
2026-03-30 19:07:46 +00:00
Richard Smith 37b238fa28 Make C++ types impl Core.Default. (#6962)
C++ classes that are default-constructible now implement `Core.Default`
by calling the default constructor.
2026-03-25 21:07:24 +00:00
Richard SmithandGeoff Romer ce50f181f1 Add an interface for initialization of vars without an explicit initializer (#6934)
When a `var` is not explicitly given an initializer, initialize it in
one of two ways:

* If its type implements the new interface `Core.Default`, call
`Core.Default.Op` to initialize it.
* Otherwise, if its type implements `UnformedInit`, leave it in an
unformed state. For now, this is always an uninitialized state, but that
will change in the future.
* If neither of those apply, the `var` declaration is ill-formed.

This is a step towards implementing leads decision #6739 and proposals
#257 and #5913.

Assisted-by: Gemini 3.1 Pro via Antigravity

---------

Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
2026-03-19 23:46:06 +00:00
Dana JansensandChandler Carruth 744b1290cf Roll LLVM b20d7d02..6811a83c815 (#6844)
Roll LLVM to `6811a83c81500ee373adfc0d9978ff9625a4cf1c`.

This includes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183831 which
moved the functionality of `finish()` on `DiagnosticConsumer`s into the
destructors, and removed the `finish()` method. So, our callers to
`finish()` are migrated to cause the destructor to run at that time
instead.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2026-03-09 15:00:21 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 375a736c42 Update LLVM to a more recent commit (#6771)
This includes the major version bump and some changes to output in
various tests.
2026-02-23 20:30:55 +00:00
David Blaikie 773b7136ef Use a single llvm::Module for C++ interop and Carbon IRGen (#6595)
Some module metadata changed - because rather than linking one module
with one module metadata value (eg: PIC Level 0, or unspecified) and one
module with a different one (PIC level 2, in clang) - we use Clang's
Module as-is, no merging required, so Clang's module metadata sticks
rather than being merged with default values from Carbon.

Also tweaked the name we use for Clang's module name so it matches the
carbon file name.

Otherwise the IR changes seem to be just reorderings - C++ interop goes
first, then Carbon, rather than the other way around.
2026-01-17 00:15:53 +00:00
David Blaikie f1f6005d4a Perform Clang IRGen during check (#6569)
Background:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wi85FRiWh4X9A-gCYMVGKR40-q5fM6-3JaSpePk-XCY/edit?usp=sharing
And specifically this work is essentially an alternative to #5543

Clang's code generation is implemented through an ASTListener
(clang::CodeGenerator) that is attached throughout Clang's
parsing/sema/code
generation phases and acts on Clang AST incrementally throughout that
process.

Prior to this patch, Carbon has only created the CodeGenerator during
Carbon's
`lower` phase, missing out on key callbacks that would be made by Clang
during
`check`. Some of these issues were addressed by #6237 and #6483 - but
there were
still remaining cases where the delayed processing lead to missing
functionality.

With #6483 much of the Clang code that made multithreaded complexity of
#5543 is
no longer present, and we have access to the point of ASTListener
registration
so we can register the CodeGenerator there and consume its resulting
llvm::Module during lower.

Examples of some of the bugs this addresses are seen in the linked doc,
and
checked in as tests in this change in
`clang_code_generator_callbacks.carbon`

An indicental bug that's also fixed, and caused all the other test case
churn,
is that the `CodeGenerator` created during `lower` wasn't getting passed
the
Clang `CodeGenOpts` and was creating its own default - so, most notably,
optimization flags were not respected. This meant that the LLVM IR from
Clang
was always -O0 style IR (optnone, no inlinehint, no TBAA, etc). With
this
change, now the Clang IRGen gets the real `CodeGenOpts` and respects
optimization/other flags specified there.

This is only meant to be a rough proof of concept - I'm totally open to
reworking this in any way (even quite substantially) if folks have ideas
about
how this should be implemented most generally/elegantly/etc.
2026-01-14 00:54:37 +00:00
Richard Smith 531d063596 When importing a trivial destructor from C++, produce a no_op builtin. (#6531)
This avoids us trying to produce a reference to the C++ destructor,
which Clang won't emit because it believes it's unnecessary. This
previously led to link errors.

Fixe #6502.
2025-12-23 05:30:29 +00:00
Richard Smith c7cd24e1b2 Support for calling C++ destructors. (#6453)
Synthesize an impl of `Destroy` for C++ classes in response to impl
lookup.
2025-12-09 21:03:27 +00:00
David BlaikieandDana Jansens a179bd461b Start plumbing through debug info type information with function parameters/return value (#6410)
This adds just enough debug info for i32/int parameters and return
values, with a path forward for adding DWARF type metadata for other
types.

As it happens, return type information is carried separately from
parameter information:
* Return type information is carried in the `type` of the `DISubprogram`
  (as a `DISubroutineType` - which does carry parameter type information
  as well, but that's unused when the DWARF is emitted by LLVM)
* Parameter information is carried by `DILocalVariable`s with a non-zero
  `arg` value (representing the order of function parameters)

In the absence of locations for the parameters (future work), nothing
would usually keep the `DILocalVariable` live/reachable when emitting
DWARF - so for cases where this can happen (for clang, this happens in
optimized builds where all references to the parameter variable might be
optimized away) the variables can be "retained" in a list on the
`DISubprogram` - achieved by passing `AlwaysPreserve` parameter to
`createParameterVariable` (adds them to a list, then that list gets
attached to the `DISubprogram` when it's finalized later)

For now, any unsupported types are emitted as `void*` (except void
return, which is implemented as void) as a placeholder.

Given this example:
```
import Core library "io";
class MyClass {
}
fn Unsupported(v: MyClass) {
}
fn Ret() -> i32 {
  return 42;
}
fn Arg(x: i32) {
  Core.Print(x);
}
fn Run() {
}
```
this is the resulting DWARF:
```
DW_TAG_compile_unit
  DW_AT_name    ("test.carbon")
  DW_TAG_subprogram
    DW_AT_name  ("Unsupported")
    DW_TAG_formal_parameter
      DW_AT_type        (0x00000066 "void *")
  DW_TAG_subprogram
    DW_AT_name  ("Ret")
    DW_AT_type  (0x00000062 "int")
  DW_TAG_subprogram
    DW_AT_name  ("Arg")
    DW_TAG_formal_parameter
      DW_AT_type        (0x00000062 "int")
  DW_TAG_subprogram
    DW_AT_name  ("Run")
  DW_TAG_base_type
    DW_AT_name  ("int")
  DW_TAG_pointer_type
```
And the debugger:
```
(gdb) p Ret()
$1 = 42
(gdb) p Arg(4)
4
$2 = void
```

I'm not sure if there's a way this logic should be merged with the logic
for making the `llvm::Function` type (which the `DISubroutineType`
building code was inspired by/copied from) - since they're done at
different times/places, I don't think there's an easy way to do it in
one pass, but maybe the code can be shared (even if it's run twice) in
some generic `SemIR::Function` type walker.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
2025-11-25 23:25:09 +00:00
David Blaikie bb9942823f DebugInfo: Emit as "C++" rather than "C" (#6361)
This helps at least lldb handle calling functions (currently the debug
info describes every function as `void()`, so no parameters or return
values are supported) - seems gdb and lldb both depend on demangling to
varying degrees in C code (marking a function as "prototyped" in C in
DWARF does seem to also address this problem).

Given:
```
fn PrintThree() {
  Core.Print(3);
}
```
Before:
```
  (lldb) p PrintThree()
  error: Couldn't look up symbols:
    PrintThree
  Hint: The expression tried to call a function that is not present in
    the target, perhaps because it was optimized out by the compiler.
```
After:
```
  (lldb) p PrintThree()
  3
  (lldb)
```
2025-11-18 18:28:56 +00:00
aa69a484eb Add support for running LLVM optimizer. (#6225)
Adds a flag `--optimize=<mode>` that specifies what to optimize for:

* `--optimize=none` turns off the optimizer as much as possible, but
still respects always_inline.
* `--optimize=debug` aims to be the equivalent of `-Og` / `-O1`, and
provides optimizations that don't affect the ability to debug the
program. This is the default.
* `--optimize=size` optimizes for the size of the produced program, and
aims to be the equivalent of `-Oz`.
* `--optimize=speed` optimizes for the execution time of the produced
program, and aims to be the equivalent of `-O3`.

Following the approach taken by Clang, the optimization level feeds into
both the configuration of the LLVM pass pipeline and the attributes
added to function definitions generated by the frontend.

Optimization is performed in a new phase, `optimize`, which runs between
`lower` and `codegen`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2025-11-05 00:15:14 +00:00
Richard Smith a1a35c207e Unify "needs thunk" logic. (#6277)
Remove duplication between determining whether a parameter needs custom
thunk mapping and whether a function needs a thunk. Now a function needs
a thunk if any parameter or the return type does.

This fixes some inconsistencies; previously:
- We would not require a thunk when passing an `unsigned int`, but if we
  had a thunk we'd pass `unsigned int` indirectly.
- We would always require a thunk for an enum parameter, even though
  we'd actually pass it directly if its underlying type is a 32- or
  64-bit integer.
- We would require a thunk for a nullable pointer, even though
  we arrange for all pointer types to have the same ABI in Carbon and
  C++, including nullable pointers / Optional(T*).

This also causes us to use a thunk for rvalue reference return types,
which we used to miscompile.

Depends on #6276.
2025-10-27 22:49:29 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 1e7b7e53ae C++ interop: support for default arguments. (#6108)
The general strategy here is to force use of a thunk when we want to use
default arguments, and have Clang generate uses of the default arguments
on its side of the thunk.

To support this, change the key type used in `clang_decls` from being
just a `Decl*` to being a pair of `Decl*` and number of parameters in
the case of function decls. Import distinct `SemIR::Function`s for each
number of parameters that's used, and corresponding distinct thunks.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-09-24 01:07:59 +00:00
Richard Smith d37f1ae6b5 Add return value support to C++ thunks. (#5976)
Based on #5948. A couple of tricky parts:

* When generating the C++ side of the thunk, we are given a pointer to
the location to emplace the return value. The only mechanism C++
provides to perform this emplacement is using placement `operator new`,
which requires a library function in the `<new>` header. We handle this
by declaring that library function ourselves, and rely on Clang not
actually needing a definition for it (which the standard library owns).

* On the Carbon side of the thunk, we want to form an initializing
expression as the result of the call. We don't have a way of expressing
in SemIR that an initializing expression performs its initialization by
storing through a pointer, so this PR adds a new initializing
instruction, `InPlaceInit`, to model an initialization that's performed
opaquely in-place.
2025-08-26 02:23:38 +00:00