Disables three new warnings because they lean more towards style
conflicts than fixes. I've brought these up on #style.
Other than that, mostly fixing basic issues, and things that
clang-tidy-20 seems to fire where clang-tiday-16 didn't. One particular
curious case is `llvm::StringLiteral::data()` uses, which are flagged as
not strictly null-terminated; I'm switching to `const char*` in those
spots which matches `llvm::formatv`'s format argument, but feels worse.
I'm removing `run_clang_tidy.py` here because I'm observing it give
fewer warnings than `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k
//toolchain/...`. The latter matches how we enforce in GitHub actions
(and also caches results, and suppresses output for files that have no
issues), so I'm dropping the bespoke script.
This introduces `calling_convention_param_ids`, a single block that
consolidates all the information that was being used by consumers of
`param_refs` and `implicit_param_refs`, in a form that's easier to
produce and typically easier to consume.
See also [this Discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1300545448909738125)
regarding the decision to keep the return slot last in the SemIR calling
convention, even though it goes first in the LLVM calling convention.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This is for more clearly distinct names, and to make it a clearer
transition from `BuiltinInst` for name conflicts. `FloatType` is also an
instruction, and we have `Carbon::Error` (common/error.h). This avoids
affecting tests, although the name is embedded in the builtin test.
In `LegacyFloatType`, `Legacy` because I was having trouble coming up
with a more appropriate name. I'm not clear this is a `FloatLiteralType`
at present, it needs some work to mirror `IntLiteralType`.
In `ErrorInst`, the suffix `Inst` was discussed as good and similar to
`BuiltinInst` (although I'm trying to get rid of that).
- Generate runtime indices as part of pattern matching, rather than as a
separate postprocessing/rewriting step.
- In contexts where runtime parameters aren't permitted, avoid emitting
insts for them to begin with, rather than trying to detect the problem
and rewrite the IR to remove them later on.
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add a new `specific_function` instruction that represents a generic
function plus its deduced argument list as a callee in a function call.
The new instruction can only appear as the immediate operand of a call
instruction, so we give it a builtin placeholder type.
At the end of each file, require definitions for all specific functions
used in that file. Resolve the generic with the argument list to produce
those specific function definitions as needed, and diagnose if the
generic doesn't have a definition available.
A few tests are updated in cases where they declared and used generic
functions but didn't previously provide a function definition.
Updates `SemIR::Function::GetParamFromParamRefId` to return more
information in the form of a new `ParamInfo` struct. This struct has a
method for getting the `NameId` from the name binding instruction. The
callers previously got it from the `Param` instruction, but the plan is
for that instruction to no longer be associated with a name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
I guess this technically would also allow code to pass check that hasn't
before, and that isn't covered by tests (since it's masked by other
failures in the tests that already test this functionality) - should I
add another test/add some code to a valid test case?
Also, this'll miscompile in lowering, since there's no support there yet
- should I do anything about that to make lowering fail in some way? Or
is it acceptable that some things just silently mis-lower? (I could add
a currently-miscompiling test case too, to demonstrate this? (not sure
if the autogenerated tests leave space for comments that would explain
that the currently-tested behavior is incorrect?))
Is the addition to EntityWithParamsBase suitable? of course not all
functions can be virtual, so it's a wasted bit at the moment for all
those cases (though it's free, since it's bitpacked - but as we want to
add more bits in there it might not be a scalable solution)?
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This adds fields to `EntityWithParamsBase` to reflect the intention with
`extern library` design. I'm renaming `decl_id` because it shouldn't be
expected to be assigned anymore. import_ref.cpp I'm deliberately keeping
on `first_owning_decl_id` (which will break when importing `extern
library` declarations). Most other cases are for diagnostics, and I'm
using `latest_decl_id` to try and get the closest declaration to the
error. Note I'm partly splitting out this PR to show the test effect,
which apparently we don't test related cases.
Rename `ReturnInfo` to `ReturnTypeInfo`. Move it and `InitRepr` into
`type_info.h` alongside `ValueRepr`. Replace `ReturnSlot` with
`InitRepr`, and extend `InitRepr` to be able to represent the
incomplete-type case instead of CHECK-failing. Remove `has_return_slot`
from `InitRepr` and instead only provide that as part of
`ReturnTypeInfo`.
The caching isn't buying us much, and is adding complexity and
divergence between the codepaths for generic and non-generic functions.
This means we no longer suppress diagnostics for the second or
subsequent time we call a function with an incomplete return type. If we
want to add that back, it might be worth considering moving the
suppression to `TryToCompleteType` and only diagnosing that a type is
incomplete once, regardless of why we're requiring it to be complete.
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
I'd considered moving DeclParams uses over, but when handling qualified
names, there's a parse node instead of an instruction. I did try to
unify a couple other uses though, including adding MergeDefinition. I
expect `interface` will use a little more once it's more completely
implemented, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
Note this isn't implementing checking through imports. The parse node
there is harder to access through the context, so would require
examining the entity in order to get the import declaration, to get at
the ImportIR. We also don't have a parse tree attached in that case, and
would need to add one to SemIR::File. But I believe we do want to add
that, so it's explicitly a TODO.
Note GetTokenText re-lexes literal values, so there's a bit of potential
overhead there. Not sure if we want a more efficient manner for
comparing in cases like this.
I'm trying to increase the distinction between BuiltinKind and
BuiltinFunctionKind. BuiltinKind is for instructions,
BuiltinFunctionKind is for function definitions. To get to this point,
I'm doing a few changes:
- BuiltinKind -> BuiltinInstKind
- builtin_kind.* -> builtin_inst_kind.*: filename consistency
- Builtin -> BuiltinInst: mainly for consistency with the above
- Builtin::builtin_kind -> BuiltinInst::builtin_inst_kind: somewhat
repetitive but seems like a consistent edit
- Function::builtin_kind -> Function::builtin_function_kind: seems a
useful distinction
I'm leaving alone things like (and mentioning in case there's a desire
for more renames):
- InstId::BuiltinError, InstId::ForBuiltin: these I think are more
apparent because they're directly associated with Inst.
- GetBuiltinICmpPredicate in lowering: maybe builtin function handling
should be in its own file, but these local names don't feel problematic
to me.
- GetBuiltinType, BuildBuiltinValueRepr, PerformBuiltinIntComparison:
similar to the above, names don't feel too problematic
Build a `Generic` object for generic functions. This object tracks the
generic parameters that are in scope for the generic entity. Eventually
it will track other information about the generic too.
Add basic SemIR formatting support for generic functions.
Instead of redundantly storing both the `return_type_id` and
`return_storage_id`, where the declared return type is just the type of
the return storage, store only the `return_storage_id`.
Add a convenience property to get the declared return type of the
function.
In addition to avoiding storing redundant information, this is a
preparatory step for an upcoming change for generics support that will
make it more expensive and awkward to store `TypeId`s in places other
than the type of an instruction.
Following up on discussion from #3948, doing a general rename of
"enclosing scope" to "parent scope" (and "enclosing scopes" to "ancestor
scopes"). The intent is to improve understandability and collide less
with C++ terminology for "enclosing scope". Note this changes most uses
of "enclosing", but leaves behind a few like "enclosing function" and
"enclosing block".
Note this does create some "parent class" mentions for "adapt" and "var"
(the class they're within), which is maybe unfortunate, but we'd
probably say "base class" if we meant inheritance so perhaps that's
okay. Along the same lines, these are the only `parent_class` uses I see
now, and we do have a few `base_class`.
This removes the builtin FunctionType, replacing it with a FunctionType
instruction. The constant for a FunctionDecl is now a StructValue with
type of FunctionType.
Note this means a function declaration produces _both_ a type, and a
value of the type. This has some consequences in terms of circularity,
and makes the importing of function declarations a little more complex.
It'll get particularly peculiar for imports because of the behavior of
the reference, but that's a known issue due to other things such as
`alias`. The impact will hopefully be contained to
ResolvePrevInstForMerge (and ImportRefs).
To note a small formatting change in diagnostics:
```
- // CHECK:STDERR: fail_member_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated <function> in Interface>` is not callable.
+ // CHECK:STDERR: fail_member_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated F in Interface>` is not callable.
- // CHECK:STDERR: fail_todo_facet_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated <function> in Interface>` is not callable.
+ // CHECK:STDERR: fail_todo_facet_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated F in Interface>` is not callable.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Move completeness check to the point where the function is defined or
first called. This means we also defer deciding whether the function has
a return slot until that point. Instead of storing a return slot per
function, store the location of the return storage, which may or may not
be used, and compute and store a separate flag saying whether to use it
at the point of first use or definition.
This is the final piece in supporting simple `Make` functions in classes
as a replacement for constructors.
In preparation for adding more builtins, factor out the handling of
builtin function kinds into separate files.
Add checking for builtin function signatures. The mechanism used here is
intended to provide a lot of flexibility for declaring generic builtin
functions and pretty arbitrary constraints on the types of parameters of
builtin functions. For now, these constraints are checked when the
builtin function is declared. The hope is that this will suffice, but if
not, it should be straightforward to switch to doing some of the
checking on call and share logic between the checks.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
For now, a builtin function is defined by specifying a string literal
initializer in a function declaration:
```carbon
fn MyBuiltin(a: i32) -> i32 = "builtin.name";
```
End-to-end support is included for a sample `"int.add"` builtin
performing integer addition, covering constant evaluation and code
generation.
The implementation here needs substantial refactoring before we'll be
ready to start adding more builtins. That refactoring work will be
coming next. This change is aiming to checkpoint some incremental
progress.
Still needs more merge/redeclaration logic for import semantics, but
this felt like a reasonable point to send a PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
In `Class` we have:
```
// The following members always have values, and do not change throughout the
// lifetime of the class.
// The following members are set at the `{` of the class definition.
// The following members are accumulated throughout the class definition.
// The following members are set at the `}` of the class definition.
```
`Interface` has similar, minus the "accumulated" members. I'm echoing
this, except `Function` has no `}` members; at present, nothing
differentiates between "started definition" and "completed definition",
unlike the other two.
Also removing a slightly inconsistent default value for decl_id.
I'm proposing a different split, along the line of "what does this
relate to". I view impl.h as having started down this route. Moving the
inst store stuff to inst.h feels odd to me given how much else is there
right now, but maybe it's still the best approach. Some files only
contain a store, no structured class, but I felt the consistency in file
naming (without _store suffixes) might help.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L
David BlaikieandJon Ross-Perkins
