Just a small packing optimization. We currently have 222 `NodeKinds`, so
this reduces us to just 30ish more we can add without needing to pack
more. However, if we did, there would be a couple options for bringing
the count down by reusing `NodeKinds` and disambiguating based on the
token kind (the 29 infix operators as an example). Or we could just undo
this.
I'm expecting this to yield a small improvement. I'll see if I can get
better numbers since my machine's not really reliable, but here are some
basic values.
Also suggesting to draw the use of `::RawEnumType` for `TokenKind`,
since bit packing appears to work without it. Hoping the `static_assert`
is easier for people to understand the size of the field.
With the change:
```
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations Bytes Lines Tokens
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 50399 ns 50359 ns 14336 104.588M/s 3.87217M/s 21.8629M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 237823 ns 237629 ns 3072 136.721M/s 4.11986M/s 24.2058M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 997645 ns 996771 ns 768 142.343M/s 4.04105M/s 23.9363M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 4020308 ns 4018319 ns 192 152.041M/s 4.05966M/s 24.0874M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 16691390 ns 16683058 ns 48 151.317M/s 3.92374M/s 23.2936M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 75265735 ns 75233476 ns 8 135.842M/s 3.48421M/s 20.6862M/s
```
Without the change:
```
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations Bytes Lines Tokens
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 51515 ns 51480 ns 13312 102.312M/s 3.78789M/s 21.387M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 241040 ns 240900 ns 3072 134.865M/s 4.06392M/s 23.8771M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 985593 ns 984657 ns 768 144.094M/s 4.09077M/s 24.2308M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 4109327 ns 4105496 ns 192 148.813M/s 3.97345M/s 23.576M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 17459655 ns 17446006 ns 48 144.7M/s 3.75215M/s 22.275M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 80802815 ns 80737489 ns 8 126.581M/s 3.24668M/s 19.276M/s
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Move subtree sizes over to TreeAndSubtrees, using the different
structure to represent the additional parse work that occurs, as well as
making it clear which functions require the extra information. My intent
is to make it hard to use this by accident.
The subtree size is still tracked during Parse::Tree construction. I
think a lot of that can be cleaned up, although we use it during
placeholder assignment so it may take some work. I wanted to see what
people thought about this before taking action on such a change.
I'm using a 1m line source file generated by #4124 for testing. Command
is `time bazel-bin/toolchain/install/prefix_root/bin/carbon compile
--phase=check --dump-mem-usage ~/tmp/data.carbon`
At head, what I'm seeing is:
```
...
parse_tree_.node_impls_:
used_bytes: 61516116
reserved_bytes: 61516116
...
Total:
used_bytes: 447814230
reserved_bytes: 551663894
...
1.43s user 0.14s system 99% cpu 1.565 total
```
With `Tree::Verify` disabled completely, it looks like:
```
parse_tree_.node_impls_:
used_bytes: 41010744
reserved_bytes: 41010744
...
Total:
used_bytes: 427308858
reserved_bytes: 531158522
...
1.20s user 0.13s system 99% cpu 1.332 total
```
Re-enabling just the basic verification (what is now `Tree::Verify`),
I'm seeing maybe 0.05s slower, but that's within noise for my system. I
do see variability in my timing results, and overall I think this is a
0.2s +/- 0.1s improvement versus the earlier (always testing `Extract`
code) implementation. That's opt; debug builds will be unaffected,
because the same checking occurs as before.
Note, the subtree size is a third of the node representation, which is
why I'm showing the decrease in memory usage here.
Following up on discussion from #3948, doing a general rename of
"enclosing scope" to "parent scope" (and "enclosing scopes" to "ancestor
scopes"). The intent is to improve understandability and collide less
with C++ terminology for "enclosing scope". Note this changes most uses
of "enclosing", but leaves behind a few like "enclosing function" and
"enclosing block".
Note this does create some "parent class" mentions for "adapt" and "var"
(the class they're within), which is maybe unfortunate, but we'd
probably say "base class" if we meant inheritance so perhaps that's
okay. Along the same lines, these are the only `parent_class` uses I see
now, and we do have a few `base_class`.
Just spotted these while looking at warnings that seem to fire on our
code are probably are things we'd fix if we saw them. None of these seem
important FWIW.
Also removes a redundant flag that is part of `-Wall`.
I have a follow-up for the high-value warning I spotted that motivated
me to look at all of this. But it's noisy so kept it as a separate PR.
Change syntax for package declaration to put the `impl` keyword at the
start and remove the `api` keyword.
To support this, rearrange processing of package, library, and import
declarations to use the general modifier handling support in declaration
parsing rather than special-case logic.
There is an ambiguity in `impl package.Foo as Bar`, which we resolve by
treating `package` as an introducer after a modifier only if it's not
followed by `.`.
When we expect a semicolon, we should be able to provide more standard
recovery.
Note this affects a test of `base`, but it looks like a partial
improvement (the prior line was moving too far). Still, it looks like
recovery isn't handling `{}` quite right. I'm not trying to address that
here though -- leaving a TODO.
This is something I noticed working on
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/3884; I think we
have more functions named Diagnose* at present than Emit* or Report*, so
just trying to consolidate. Note a couple Diagnose* functions do a
little more validation, but maybe those should actually be renamed away
(zygoloid had mentioned wanting to generally split out diagnostics to
their own function, and then we'd have it be a more common pattern).
In parse, form a list of methods that are defined inline, tracking where
they start, where they end, and which other inline methods are nested
within them.
In check, when we reach an inline method body, skip it and add it to a
worklist to be processed later. We also track when we reach the start
and end of a context in which inline method bodies are deferred, so that
we know when to replay the bodies.
When suspending a function definition to be processed later, the
`DeclNameStack` entry is moved to separate storage, including popping
the corresponding scopes from the scope stack and removing the
corresponding lexical names from lexical lookup. Later, when we return
to the function and parse its definition, the `DeclNameStack` entry is
restored. The same is done when we reach the end of a nested context
that can have inline methods, so that we can reenter the nested scope
before processing its members.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This was previously discussed at
https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1209975051588210729.
I'm initiating this mainly because we typically use "id" suffixes to
indicate an `IdBase` being passed around and the non-id suffix of
`parse_node` suggests at it carrying more data than it actually does.
There used to be more reason for avoiding `node_id` because
`SemIR::InstId` used to be named `NodeId`, but that's no longer
necessary. As a consequence, I'd like to rename `parse_node` to more
precisely reflect its type.
In full, this is doing:
```
parse_node_kind -> node_kind
parse_node -> node_id
ParseNodeCategory -> NodeCategory
ParseNodeKind -> NodeKind
ParseNode -> NodeId
```
This is primarily in check and sem_ir, but with some `parse_node_kind`
references in parse too.
Pluralization is consistent with name forms on both sides, so that
wasn't part of my replacements.
Building on #3463. The PushState+PopState to construct a state feels
worth cleanup. The rest is just kind of making it easier to do without
adding another PushState overload.
These are manual fixes; mostly from clang-tidy, some from clangd (which
notes unused includes).
In typed_insts, adding inlline due to misc-definitions-in-headers. Per
discussion, clang-tidy is wrong, but inline silences it.
For parameter name skew in definition versus declaration, I'm just using
the name from the definition.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
As I was working on this, I noticed `import` and `library` syntax needs
to be fixed for how it imports the current package, and for `Main`
libraries. This mostly reflects the current state in its testing.
Otherwise, this should handle most of the errors I could think of:
dependency cycles, redundant imports, etc.
It does not actually deal with the nuances of cross-IR references.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
For now, we require the same introducer to be used each time a class is
declared, but see #3384.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This detects ordering issues with the `package` and `import` statements.
`library` is changed from package-specific to instead be generic between
the two, since structurally it's non-specific.
The next step would be to start exposing the results for the driver to
make ordering decisions for checking. That'll involve further
modifications to this code, but this felt like a reasonable change point
because it's the extent of the parser enforcement, and still causes
significant refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
A `let` declaration is represented by a `bind_name` node in SemIR:
```carbon-semir
%b: i32 = bind_name "b", %a
```
Because `Check` encounters the pattern before it sees the value, we
first create the `bind_name` node with an unset value and don't add it
to the block. Then, once we've seen and converted the initializer, we
update the `bind_name` to have the value and add it to the current
block, after the initializer code.
Continuing with #3070. Just a dir and file rename (only prefix change is
lexer_file_test). Everything in the lex dir should be marked as a move.
Note, I think this closes#3070. There may still be further cleanup
later, but the organizational changes suggested there are being
completed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Continuing with #3070. Just a dir and file rename (mostly removing
prefixes, although for parse_tree_fuzzer and parse_tree_file_test I'm
dropping "tree" instead of "parse"). Everything in the parse dir should
be marked as a move.
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth
josh11bandJon Ross-Perkins
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith