Commit Graph
10 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Boaz Brickner fa9d838270 Fix CC1Main setting trigger undefined behavior (#4714)
This is caused by setting a temporary lambda to a `llvm::function_ref`.
The fix is to assign the lambda into a variable that outlives the
`llvm::function_ref`.
2025-01-03 11:34:28 +00:00
josh11bandJosh L 47bfa375af Propagate llvm::vfs::FileSystem from driver_env to Clang (#4537)
As discussed in #4530 . This required switching to using
`llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr` in a number of places.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-11-18 18:24:19 +00:00
josh11bandJosh L 93169c30b1 Update LLVM (#4530)
Includes updates to reflect these LLVM changes:
* https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112517
* https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113331

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-11-15 00:09:10 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 957599b2ab Implement a basic busybox for carbon/clang. (#4406)
For reference, we're going down the busyboxing route because Carbon
depends on Clang, and we want both to be available as binaries.
Busyboxing allows this while avoiding duplicating symbols between
multiple binaries.

I'm removing the `cc_binary` for `driver:carbon` because I want to avoid
a significant increase in binary outputs; `bazel run //toolchain` still
works great.

This still doesn't have great test coverage (but non-zero:
`//examples:sieve` still builds/runs, for example). The problem is that
we want to avoid subprocessing for performance, but this mainly deals
with subprocessing. I'm still thinking about good approaches for that,
since we'll probably want more significant testing for `clang`
interaction... the solution might involve busyboxing `file_test` too.

Note development on this ran into the argv issue being fixed in #4405
2024-10-30 17:07:55 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth 4332d8239d Fix invocation issues with clang runner (#4353)
`ToolContext` should be explicitly initialized.

`-c` can still require a valid, writable `-o` path.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2024-09-27 20:33:11 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth c107aaad13 Add a clang subcommand. (#4322)
This makes something like `bazel run :toolchain -- clang -- -c test.cpp`
work, because that can be run in-process. Note that `bazel run
:toolchain -- clang -- test.cpp` still requires subprocessing, and does
not work.

Note, the vision here is that we are trying to align how clang and
carbon compile c++ code. This is work towards intertwining command
execution.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2024-09-23 23:21:20 +00:00
4845f40dff Switch CARBON_CHECK to a format string API (#4285)
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.

The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.

As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.

However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.

One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.

This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256      86.3µs ± 1%  82.9µs ± 1%  -3.94%  (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024      431µs ± 1%   415µs ± 1%  -3.76%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096     1.77ms ± 1%  1.71ms ± 1%  -3.18%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384    7.44ms ± 1%  7.17ms ± 2%  -3.56%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536    30.7ms ± 1%  29.7ms ± 1%  -3.15%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144    131ms ± 1%   127ms ± 1%  -2.81%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256       878µs ± 2%   800µs ± 1%  -8.91%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024     1.88ms ± 2%  1.72ms ± 1%  -8.56%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096     5.78ms ± 2%  5.28ms ± 1%  -8.70%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384    21.9ms ± 1%  20.1ms ± 1%  -8.02%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536    90.4ms ± 2%  83.1ms ± 1%  -8.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144    381ms ± 2%   352ms ± 1%  -7.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-12 16:42:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 0c8ab663c9 Migrate all CARBON_VLOG to the format string variant. (#4284)
This mostly uses a hilarious set of regular expressions to mechanically
switch all but two uses, and then manually fixed the last two. There
weren't too many.

Also simplifies the `vlog` implementation now that it's all going
through a format string.

This alone has a nice impact on parse and check of about 2% and 1%
respectively. The impact on lex in my timings looks like noise (no
change in instruction count, unlike the other phases).
```
name                                               old cpu/op   new cpu/op   delta
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/256        39.1µs ± 3%  38.1µs ± 2%  -2.42%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/1024        187µs ± 3%   183µs ± 1%  -2.30%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/4096        776µs ± 4%   756µs ± 1%  -2.62%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/16384      3.36ms ± 1%  3.33ms ± 1%  -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/65536      14.4ms ± 2%  14.2ms ± 1%  -1.41%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/262144     65.7ms ± 1%  65.2ms ± 2%  -0.86%  (p=0.002 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256      87.5µs ± 1%  86.3µs ± 1%  -1.43%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024      438µs ± 2%   431µs ± 1%  -1.54%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096     1.81ms ± 2%  1.77ms ± 1%  -2.12%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384    7.54ms ± 1%  7.43ms ± 1%  -1.44%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536    31.2ms ± 1%  30.6ms ± 1%  -2.03%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144    133ms ± 1%   130ms ± 1%  -1.85%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256       882µs ± 1%   878µs ± 1%  -0.52%  (p=0.001 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024     1.90ms ± 2%  1.88ms ± 1%  -1.17%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096     5.85ms ± 2%  5.76ms ± 1%  -1.43%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384    22.2ms ± 2%  21.9ms ± 2%  -1.20%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536    91.2ms ± 2%  90.3ms ± 1%  -1.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144    382ms ± 1%   380ms ± 1%  -0.51%  (p=0.003 n=18+19)
```
2024-09-11 12:11:23 +00:00
Chandler CarruthandJon Ross-Perkins d3a5b0eee7 Add utilities for managing a toolchain install, and install and use LLD. (#3993)
The install directory contains the BUILD logic for creating an
installable tree of data files and executables for the toolchain, and
a library to facilitate toolchain code accessing the paths to their data
within this installation.

Then adds an installation of LLD in a synthetic LLVM installation, and
teaches the Clang runner to configure this and use it for linking
instead of the system linker.

Currently, the install paths only really manage access to the LLVM
binaries installed and used by the Clang runner for linking, but
eventually other data files like the prelude and runtime libraries will
be fleshed out as well. There are TODOs for moving more things over here
such as the prelude.

One interesting aspect of this is where to put helpers like parts of
LLVM in our install. This PR suggests nesting those files under
`lib/carbon`. While using a `lib` subdirectory isn't a perfect fit for
the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard), having a single location where
private data is collected is significantly superior to spreading them
across the system. This also matches similar patterns used by Clang
itself and several other language toolchains and standard libraries.

The install directory also provides a natural place for us to build out
packaging rules to create installable packages in various formats, but
that remains future work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-06-01 03:19:52 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 36d8d2960a Introduce basic linking with the Clang driver. (#3922)
This adds the most rudimentary support for linking in the Carbon driver
by calling out to the Clang driver and letting it do the linking. This
is a super minimal version to start with, just enough to be somewhat
useful and to exercise calling into Clang for this.

Also adds a Clang runner to help run the Clang driver. This is a bit
more complete, although it sill needs some significant work. For
example, it will need some significant enhancements to be able to
compile C++ code, etc.

One thing that will likely change here is to better manage streams and
work better as a library. For now, this is a bit limited because Clang
and LLVM don't provide the necessary support for this.
2024-04-30 18:01:39 +00:00