Introduces the `BindingPattern` and `SymbolicBindingPattern` insts, and
a separate stack of pattern blocks that they are emitted into. The
intent is to generate the corresponding pattern-matching insts (like
`BindName`) from them in a separate pass, but that is deferred to future
PRs.
See
[here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U_vQH17V893J9aF1LJXUnFYBNSs2MjKl4bJPaWCB2zo/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-w0xGYZ0An31Kpz-wvzSXwQ)
for the design this is based on, but note that during review we have
chosen to deviate from that design by putting the patterns in separate
blocks, and omitting the "forward references" from a `BindingPattern` to
its corresponding `BindName`. This in turn necessitates having separate
inst kinds for symbolic and non-symbolic binding patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Don't use the pretty-printed type name, because that's intended for
diagnostics, not for a theoretically machine-readable format like SemIR.
Types are always constants, so omit the leading `constant.` on the type
instruction name.
Don't format the *type of* the function `F` as `"F"`. Instead use
`"<type of F>"`.
Also improve instruction naming for function and generic class name
values: name the value after the function or generic class, and add a
`.type` suffix to the type.
This has is a nice-to-have for me. Frequently I want to run a specific
test, and end up digging through output to be able to copy-paste the run
line. This uses TIP lines to inject the command into the file when using
AUTOUPDATE.
Note, one of the reasons I want this is because "bazel test
//toolchain/testing:file_test --test_output=all" has been regularly
exceeding bazel's output limit for me (workaround is either opening the
output file or specifying an obscure output limit flag), making it a
little harder for me to get the commands. However, frequently I'm adding
a file and want to iterate on it, so that's really the use case I have
in mind here.
This removes the builtin FunctionType, replacing it with a FunctionType
instruction. The constant for a FunctionDecl is now a StructValue with
type of FunctionType.
Note this means a function declaration produces _both_ a type, and a
value of the type. This has some consequences in terms of circularity,
and makes the importing of function declarations a little more complex.
It'll get particularly peculiar for imports because of the behavior of
the reference, but that's a known issue due to other things such as
`alias`. The impact will hopefully be contained to
ResolvePrevInstForMerge (and ImportRefs).
To note a small formatting change in diagnostics:
```
- // CHECK:STDERR: fail_member_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated <function> in Interface>` is not callable.
+ // CHECK:STDERR: fail_member_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated F in Interface>` is not callable.
- // CHECK:STDERR: fail_todo_facet_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated <function> in Interface>` is not callable.
+ // CHECK:STDERR: fail_todo_facet_lookup.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:3: ERROR: Value of type `<associated F in Interface>` is not callable.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This could probably go further, but I'm just trying to get the ability
to run some significant tests without the prelude. This already requires
some migration of `i32` and `bool` to non-prelude-dependent types
(technically not at the moment, but I'm trying to stick with the
philosophical model of the prelude).
Note this undoes part of #3895 which had made all lex/parse tests depend
on the prelude -- I don't think that was a necessary change. Rather, it
seems better to isolate individual lex/parse tests from the prelude. I'd
been on the fence in that PR (it was fixing one of the issues that
contributed to wanting to not include the prelude), but now it feels
more consistent. The prelude could have a parse error and we shouldn't
break every parse test on that.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith