I was wondering, instead of treating `misc` differently and enabling
specific checks, maybe we can flip that since we actually seem okay with
most of the checks?
The main check I'm enabling, with significant edits here, is
`misc-no-recursion`. But maybe this is helpful to enable, even with the
necessary NOLINTs, since we want to avoid recursion in the toolchain?
This PR shows some example fixes in subst.cpp (which are more stylistic,
since the code shouldn't actually have recursed due to its structure; I
think we could remove the warning on TryResolveInst the same way). Some
also just don't seem worth fixing, like those in tests files (I didn't
see a way to exclude files in .clang-tidy, so instead I'm using
NOLINTBEGIN). But I think we might actually want to fix inst_namer, and
there's enough in convert that I didn't look closely.
Also, I made some protected -> private style fixes based on
`misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes` (this is also how I
noticed `class Real` versus `struct Real`). With node_stack, it looks
like the `protected` wasn't even used. [Per
style](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Access_Control),
data members should be private outside tests. But since we can't
trivially exclude `protected` members in tests, I'm turning it off -- I
don't view it as offering enough benefit on the whole.
migrate_cpp issues are preexisting (I believe we just aren't monitoring
it), but changes there make `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k //...`
work cleanly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
When substituting into a generic in order to form a generic eval block,
we form `SpecificId`s to track the list of arguments that should
eventually be used to form a specific referenced by the eval block.
Values within that specific are not needed and won't ever be used, so
it's safe to skip forming them in the first place.
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Also fix a bug in `Context::GetClassType` that previously tried to
complete the class type before returning it. That's not correct --
`GetCompleteTypeImpl` is only appropriate for cases where the type can
trivially be completed and completing it can't fail -- and led to
infinite recursion with this change because we would call `GetClassType`
when producing a diagnostic if completing that class type failed.
* Rewrite constraints are stored in a facet type, substituted, imported,
and formatted.
* We now distinguish `.Self` from other symbolic bindings in two ways:
* `.Self` itself now has an invalid compile time binding index (since it
doesn't bind to any of the generic parameters). As a result, we no
longer need to create a generic region in `handle_where.cpp`.
* There is a new phase tracking values that are only symbolic because
they transitively depend on `.Self`. This allows us to give the result
of a `where` expression template phase as long as it doesn't use any
symbolic constants other than `.Self` or other designators.
* `AddConstant` has been removed from `check/context` since it was only
used from `eval`. This meant less plumbing of the phase change.
* Evaluation of `BindSymbolicName` now also performs substitution into
its type.
* Include a bit more information in some diagnostics.
* `StringifyTypeExpr` outputs rewrites, which required adding support
for associated entities as well.
* Associated entities now have an entity name set when importing.
* Adds tests for some interesting cases with rewrites and uses of
`.Self` mixed with other symbolic constants.
Still to do:
* There is no validation that any particular type satisfies rewrite
constraints.
* Access to members of a facet type do not see the rewritten values.
* Impls don't recognize whether associated constants have rewrites
setting their values.
* No support for resolving facet types.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This does a few things:
* Replaces the single `TypeId` in the `FacetTypeInfo` struct with a
vector of `InterfaceId`, `SpecificId` pairs (sorted in id order)
representing the set of interface requirements of the facet type. This
will later be used to support facet types with multiple interface
requirements (as in `I & J` or `I where .Self impls J`).
* Replace `InterfaceType` instructions (used as the type of an
`InterfaceDecl` instruction) with `FacetType` instructions (introduced
in #4460) with a (newly introduced) `FacetTypeFromInterface()` function.
* Replace code that consumed `InterfaceType` values with code that
consumed `FaceType` values. I've generally left the assumption in the
code that it is dealing with a single interface, using the (newly
introduced) `FacetTypeInfo::TryAsSingleInterface`, and producing an
error otherwise. There isn't yet support for the `&` operator or `where
.Self impls`, so this is generally a good assumption for now, except you
can get a facet type with no associated interfaces from a `type
where`... expression. In some cases, the facet type value is pulled from
the evaluation of an `InterfaceDecl` instruction, where the single
interface assumption will hold permanently.
* Some related cleans up: nicer stringification and formatting of facet
types, suppression of some errors when there already was an error.
There is still a lot left to do, including:
* Type `type` should be a facet type with a reserved id, replacing the
built-in instruction.
* Code using `TryAsSingleInterface` should generally be upgraded to
handle more than (or less than) one interface. Name lookup should be
particularly exciting.
* Operator `&` should be defined on facet types, unioning their
interface and other requirements.
* Requirements from a `where` clause don't do anything yet.
* Impls and impl lookup need to resolve facet types, and do things like
determine if all the associated constants are given values.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This converts `StructTypeField` from an instruction to a dedicated type,
with its own store. This had originated from discussing how
`.GetAs<SemIR::StructTypeField>` was more prevalent than for other
instructions, but is probably more interesting for the storage savings
(16 bytes StructTypeField + 4 byte LocId + 4 byte InstId -> 8 byte
StructTypeField).
Due to the different structure, these now have their own stack during
construction, reducing (but not eliminating) `args_type_info_stack_`
use-cases.
The test changes of different InstIds is expected because structs and
classes generate fewer instructions now. Other than that, results should
remain the same.
I'm generally trying to avoid unrelated cleanup here due to the PR size,
though I did scrutinize the `VerifyOnFinish` calls, adding one and
commenting others (putting them in member order because that's how I was
checking what was verified and what wasn't).
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
For each generic, build a list of instructions describing the
computations we need to do when resolving an instance of the generic:
this is a list of the instance-specific constants and types that the
generic uses. Another way of viewing this list is as a block of Carbon
SemIR code that is evaluated in order to form an instance of the generic
-- this is referenced in the code as the "eval block" for the generic.
For each instruction in the generic whose type or value is a symbolic
constant, replace that type or constant value with a symbolic reference
that says "to find the actual type or value, look at index N in the list
of values for the generic instance".
For an instruction with a symbolic constant value, we can just add that
instruction to our list. For an instruction with a symbolic constant
type, however, we may not have a corresponding instruction computing the
type within the generic and may need to build a new instruction, but
will reuse one where possible. In the case where we build a new
instruction, we use the existing substitution code to build the type
within the eval block.
For now, this transformation is only done in the declaration region of
the generic, not in the definition region. Also, we map back from the
symbolic references to the underlying constant value in a few places
where we will eventually need to do a lookup into a generic instance, in
order to avoid regressing the tests.
In a `class C(T:! type)`, the type `Self` should be `C(T)`, not merely
`C`. Similarly, in an `interface I(T:! type)`, the type of self should
be `I(T)`, not merely `I`.
When constant evaluation produces a known non-symbolic value, treat the
result as a symbolic constant anyway if the type of the value is
symbolic.
We don't yet have many ways to produce a constant that has a known value
but a symbolic type. The added test case is one such way: an array `[T;
0]` initialized from `()` is a symbolic constant only because its type
is symbolic -- we know its value is always `()`. More ways to form such
constants will be appearing soon as we start to support generics: for
example, a method of a generic class has a symbolic type but a known
constant value of `{}`.
When substituting into a symbolic constant, also substitute into its
type.
Require mapping from a `ConstantId` to an `InstId` to go through the
`ConstantValueStore`.
This is a preparatory step for an upcoming generics change where
symbolic `ConstantId`s are no longer just a thin wrapper around an
`InstId` but instead are indexes into a table with additional
information about the symbolic constant beyond its `InstId`.
Switch from recursing into non-canonical instruction fields to
separately canonicalizing those fields. This means we now form canonical
`InstBlockId`s, `TypeBlockId`s, `IntId`s, `FloatId`s, and `BindNameId`s
at least in the cases when they're referenced by a constant instruction.
This reduces the overall runtime for @chandlerc's 10MLoC example by
27.5% on my machine.
Use a level comparison during substitution to determine whether we're
substituting a particular binding. Evaluate symbolic bindings with the
same name and the same level to the same symbolic constant, for example
across redeclarations of a generic function.
Add a general substitution mechanism to support substituting symbolic
bindings with their values throughout symbolic constants and, more
specifically, types. This is done by decomposing the constant
instruction into its operands, substituting into the operands, and then
rebuilding the constant value by invoking the constant evaluator.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L
David Blaikie
