The main motivation for this is to get python loads in using the
`native-py` lint fix. However, enabling that made me wonder, maybe we
should fix in general?
`native-cc` is delayed, but not wholly cancelled (and `native-py`
picking up might indicate `native-cc` won't be too far behind). There's
also some automated fixes for `.append` and dict sorting -- this felt
okay to me, maybe not something to eagerly add but probably not worth
stopping buildifier from fixing (I've noticed the warnings in the past
and had been ignoring them).
Running everything does mean that load orders are sorted automatically
now, which I think is a positive. Most generally, I think these fixes
aren't _harmful_, and having them done automatically seems beneficial:
my biggest concern about `native-py` and `native-cc` was actually that
regressions wouldn't be caught, but this addresses that issue
automatically.
I'm treating my PR to mypy bazel integration as dead in the water. Abandoning that approach, this seems to work reasonably well as a replacement. It's actually a slightly newer version of mypy too -- the bazel integration was stuck on an old version.
Note I don't think we're losing much: we shouldn't be writing too much python.
I'm seeing if I can upstream thundergolfer/bazel-mypy-integration#43, but we can also point at my fork for the time being.
This should resolve conflicts with mypy treating imports as non-hermetic, creating inconsistent behavior if packages are/aren't installed locally.
- Shift some things around to adjust to being in bazel.
- Add separate build/serve/publish scripts for use by bazel (not set up for direct execution, but bazel requires +x).
- Fix some tests I noticed not running unittest.main as a result of the switch.
- Move md files into filegroups for build reuse.
- Disable automatic site publishing (now `bazel run //website/jekyll:publish`)
Site publishing seems like it'd be too much trouble to keep automated... The C++ toolchain essentially needs to be set up due to the repo config, along with syncing the LLVM submodules, etc. That seems a bit annoying to do on each run of the publish-docs action, and not something I really want to maintain. If we get a CI, we can focus on it more there, but this feels like it'd just be a one-off to maintain as a github workflow.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Jon Meow