The intent of this change is that instead of paths looking like `explorer/testdata/foo/bar.carbon` (repo-relative), they're now just `bar.carbon` (local). The consequence is that paths should be a bit more durable in various environments, and just paths should be shorter and easier to read.
The explorer's prelude is an exception to this since it comes from data, rather than being the test target. Due to the change in approaches, it needs the regex again.
Uses #2829
Isolating test execution time (no build time included):
- Linux, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 28.214s, Critical Path: 13.97s
- Linux, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 11.534s, Critical Path: 6.05s
- Linux, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 11.677s, Critical Path: 11.17s
- Mac, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 295.686s, Critical Path: 20.00s
- Mac, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 55.788s, Critical Path: 3.81s
- Mac, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 16.269s, Critical Path: 7.54s
In GH actions:
- [Before](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4866602695/jobs/8678306144?pr=2799):
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 20m
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 15m
- test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 36m
- test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 21m
- [After](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4875154751/jobs/8697004066?pr=2811):
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 10m
- test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m
- test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 12m
- test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m
I'm still leaving a handful of `lit` tests to test end-to-end binary execution. This is why testdata directories are split (`lit` tests next to the `explorer` binary, the `cc_test`s next to `ParseAndExecute`).
These functions are dangerous, as they check whether conversions are possible without actually performing the conversions. In each case where they were used, explorer would crash in some cases if a user-defined conversion is required.
This change moves us more towards implicit conversions being handled by a regular function call on an interface and away from them being magical builtins. Unfortunately, this exposes a pre-existing bug that a call of the form `x.(ImplicitAs(T).Convert)()` compiles even if `x` only has an explicit conversion to `T`. That's worked around here for now, but will need a proper fix later.
Relates to https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/1881
- Add support for `.base` field in structs for [parent class initialization](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/docs/design/classes.md#constructors)
- Disabling base class initialization without `.base`
- Support class constructors (`Create() -> Self`) for base classes
- Direct access to base class(es) attributes with `object.var` remains unaffected
Changes:
- Add `TypeChecker::FieldTypesWithBase` to help assessing if a struct with `base` fields can be converted to a class
- Add a new `base_type()` attribute+getter to `NominalClassDeclaration` to as a first step to allow resolving parametrized classes
- Add a new `base` attribute+getter to `NominalClassValue` that contains the base class `NominalClassValue`. It is currently used mainly to get and set members of a class object.
- Add `Interpreter::ConvertClassWithBase` to build `NominalClassValue` from a init struct, that contains `.base` fields with either `NominalClassValue` or `StructValue`
- Add `FindClassField` to find a field in a class or its base classes
- Remove superfluous `ClassDeclaration::base()` in favor of `ClassDeclaration::base_type()`
Limitations;
- Though some work is done in that direction, parametrized base class where time is not know at the declaration site are not supported. Namely the example below does not compile
```
base class A(T:! Type) {}
class B(T:! Type) extends A(T) {}
```
But this one is functional already
```
base class A(T:! Type) {}
class B extends A(i32) {}
```
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
josh11b
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith
Adrien LeravatandRichard Smith