@chandlerc requested that leads questions not be marked inactive. These arise when there *isn't* a clear-cut answer, and so seem to make more sense to be effectively long-term.
The \n\n\n is trying to get a blank line between paragraphs. Right now it gets a newline, but the paragraphs sort of blend. I might need more \n's, don't know but I'll keep an eye on messages. The examples that I could find don't have multiple paragraphs.
While we have a generic 'long term' label, it seems redundant for some
issues that are already labeled with something that clearly is
open-ended and not something we should expect to have a bounded
timeline. For example, we want to actively curate a backlog of design
ideas and good first issues for folks to browse and pick up, so we
shouldn't be marking them as inactive after any fixed time frame.
- Automatically mark issues/PRs `inactive` after 90 days without comments
- Archive PRs (only) after 14 more days
- Adding "long term" for issues which can't be resolved in a few months, but shouldn't be marked `inactive`.
Geoff Romer
Jon Ross-Perkins
Chandler Carruth
SADIK KUZU
Jon Meow