* adding methods to the ast
* pre commit stuff?
* implementation of class functions
* implemented methods
* some cleanup
* more cleanup
* add newlines in test programs
* pre-commit fixups
* added include of return_term.h
* a test of a method calling another method
* replacing Member with Declaration
* removing the member.h etc files
* clarify a type annotation
* update uses of FunctionDeclaration
* remove ReturnTarget, no longer needed
* more cleanup
* more cleanup
* yet more cleanup, playing with pre-commit
* did a pre-commit run --all-files
* fixed const issue
* remove comment
* checking dependencies in BUILD files and headers
* pre-commit working now
* refactor NominalClassType to just hold a pointer to the class declaration
* remove Member from rtti
* responding to Geoffreys review
* change field_types to a non-member function
* Naive pointer implementation
* Bug fixes and better pointer tests
* Remove debug print statement
* Implement changes suggested by @geoffromer
Also add a failing test case that tests applying the address-of operator
to an rvalue.
This required changing BindingPattern::name() to return `"_"` instead of nullopt when representing a `"_"` binding.
Semi-related drive-by fixes:
- Update BindingPlaceholderValue to expose a NamedEntity instead of a string name, and stop exposing its type.
- Drop the unused SourceLocation parameter of ValueEqual
Also explicitly model the types of expressions whose values are class or choice types, and make those be the static_type of the type declaration. This ensures that the static_type of a NamedEntity consistently corresponds to the static type of an IdentifierExpression using that name.
This doesn't actually use the results of name resolution, but it does verify that they are present.
Also ensures that name resolution and type checking are applied to deduced function parameters and the implicit call to `Main()`.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
- Rename `PointerValue` to `LValue` to reflect how it's actually used. We can introduce a `PointerValue` type when we add support for actual pointer values.
- Remove support for pattern assignment. It's unclear if Carbon will support this, and even if we do, it raises questions that should first be addressed in a language proposal, like "is the left-hand side of `(x, y) = (1, 2)` an lvalue, or a pattern, or both, or something else entirely?"
Rationale: Based on the status of #478 and #505, Carbon won't have this feature for a while, and it will be simpler not to support it on spec in the meantime.
`// NOLINT` is added on type aliases in stack.h and dictionary.h to allow lower_snake_case naming -- this didn't feel like a check worth disabling in spite of false positives.
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Prior to this change, `__await` would make a deep copy of the continuation stack, but shallow-copy the individual stack frames within it. As a result, continuations appeared to have shallow semantics so long as the continuation stack had only a single frame.
This change also removes an obsolete test from the brief period when we intended continuations to have deep-copy semantics, which has been passing basically by accident.
This does a mass rename of:
- `SourceLoc()` -> `source_loc()` for property naming
- `loc` -> `source_loc_` for underscore+consistency
- Generally changing function args to `source_loc` for consistency
- `Tag()` -> `kind()` for property naming and `Kind` parity
- `tag` -> `kind_` for underscore
Also renames `Pos` and `Results` on `Action`. These are a bit of an exception in that most base classes only have `Tag` and maybe `SourceLoc`, whereas `Action` has a little more. I felt okay having `source_loc()` and `kind()` on the base class where children do `Exp()` and the like, but it felt weird to me to mix it on the same class.
The reason for doing this cross-class in one PR is so that I can do it efficiently with a global replace in the codebase, rather than e.g. changing `Expression` but having to read through compiler errors to determine where it's calling `Expression`'s `Tag` versus a different `Tag`. The end result should be equivalent.
With this, only main.cpp instantiates an arena. Maybe we'll want to split that up more later (e.g., so that the runtime interpreter uses its own arena), but given the intent to have type-checking update the AST, I thought this was a reasonable approach for now in order to avoid ownership complexities.
Fixes#769
Note this makes a few cases where the Statement was optional explicit (Block, If, Sequence). I do add a few CHECKs around where statements were optional and assumed but unverified.
I switch TypeCheckStmt to not take an optional Statement because I think it makes the call sites clearer in behavior. It's also a smaller change than the converse, because taking an optional Statement means the returned statement would also need to be optional. Arguably a wrapper for optional statements could be added, but this still seems cleaner to me, and there aren't that many cases of an optional statement.
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This also eliminates the ctad wrapper for Stack: I think the leaning is to remove it. It felt worth keeping the constructor because constructing with a single element is a common use-case.
Adds a single-argument constructor for Scope because the `std::list<std::string>()` is common, and eliding it is consistent with what we've done for things like tuples.
I was considering a vector constructor due to the double-Push on line 1139, but thought the Push() semantics may mean that it's better not to provide.
It was in my mind to add String in order to support libraries in `package`. `print` is added in order to have a String go to stdout. I've tried to do `print` in a way that won't be too hard to add other printable types, but it's probably also somewhat optional here -- that is, if desired, I could remove it. But it was a lot easier to doublecheck `\n` behavior with it, and I suspect it'll be helpful in other tests if it supports more value types.
On the side, this also fixes dereferencing in Pattern/Expression Print() calls, which I was noticing printing pointers instead of values. This may be another argument for moving away from passing pointers, since this seems to be a difficult-to-catch error.
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
- Switch code to llvm::raw_ostream as part of standardizing output forms.
- Preferring llvm::raw_ostream over std::ostream because other tooling code should be expected to rely on llvm more closely, and an overall preference towards library consistency.
- There are a couple spots in syntax/ that still use std streams, but I'd prefer to take a separate PR to see how best to address those.
- std::boolalpha doesn't work with llvm, so I've implemented equivalent in a couple places (not enough that it felt like worth making a helper function).
- Implement Print(ostream) as consistently as we can, as an instance member.
- This facilitates the use of the common/ostream.h template to provide operators.
- Preferring this approach so that Print is easily accessible via gdb, per suggestion on #executable-semantics.
- Switch code currently calling `type->Print(ostream)` to instead do `ostream << *type`.
- Remove the unused `PrintTypeEnv`, nothing used it and the declaration didn't match the definition.
- Move Heap and Frame/Scope to their own headers.
- Move some functions to more appropriate headers (e.g. CopyValue -> value.h).
- Define a separate Bazel rule for each header/cpp pair.
- Modify PrintValue to not print the frames of a ContinuationValue. This was necessary to break a dependency cycle between PrintValue, PrintFrame, and Action::Print.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
Also:
- Switch data members, and associated parameters and return types to be values/references rather than pointers, where applicable.
- Move Expression's TagVisitor to anonymous namespace, to avoid name collision.
- Switch to trailing return syntax (per style guide).
Pretty much any names will be awkward, since these types represent cases where an `Expression` is not an expression, and a `Value` is not a value, but we can at least be more explicit about the fact that they represent bindings rather than variable usages.
- `Kind` enumerator names always match the corresponding factory function, accessor, and type names (if any).
- All abbreviations in those names are expanded.
- Those names always have a suffix to disambiguate expressions from values.
`VarTV` is excluded from these changes because there's a pending PR to remove it.
* changed union of Statement to be private
* changed the union in Expression to be private
* changed union in Value to be private
* changed AST constructors to be static methods
* updates to syntax unit tests
Darshal Shetty
Jon Meow