Commit Graph
33 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith 5f888e1124 Treat associated constants as entities parameterized by Self (#4837)
Add a full entity representation for associated constants, and build a
`Generic` object for them. This `Generic` is parameterized by the
enclosing `Self` type, allowing the use of `Self` within the type of the
associated constant to be supported.

When performing impl lookup for an associated constant, produce the type
with the provided self type substituted for its `Self` along with any
generic parameters of the interface.

Split the handling of associated constant declarations into two parts,
corresponding to the code before the `=`, and the code between the `=`
and `;` (if any). The former goes into the generic declaration region;
the latter into the generic definition region. This prepares us to
handle the default value for an associated constant, but for now we're
just storing the information and not actually using it.

Remove the entity type field from `assoc_entity_type`, because it's
almost unused and is an attractive nuisance -- it must necessarily be a
type in the generic scope of the associated constant rather than in the
scope of the instruction (because there is no `Self` anywhere else),
which means that it's hard to substitute into or derive meaning from.

See `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/assoc_const_self.carbon` for tests of
the new functionality; these used to cause the toolchain to crash.
2025-01-25 02:13:52 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 6b5eb1a101 Id::Invalid -> Id::None (#4834)
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.

Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).

I've tried to sequence commits here:

1. Automatic replacements:

- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
  - `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
  - `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
  - `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
  - `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`

2. Manual edits:

  - In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
    - `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
    - Manual edits to comments in this file.
  - `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
  - In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
    - `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
    - Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
    - Various mentions of "valid" in comments
  - In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
  - Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.

3. Autoupdate tests

4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)

5. Comment spot checks

Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
2025-01-22 23:15:00 +00:00
c5fd8f42b8 ImplWitness (#4679)
* Change `InterfaceWitness` -> `ImplWitness`
* Include a `SpecificId` in the `ImplWitness`. This allows the
`InstBlock` it contains to have its own identity, allowing it to be
changed as the impl is processed. Evaluation only updates the specific.
* Create the `ImplWitness` at the start of the impl definition. In the
future, this will be populated with the values of non-function
associated constants. For now, it starts full of invalid instruction
ids.
* Implements the model suggested in #4672 .

Note that the non-SemIR testdata changes are to these file:
* `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/lookup/fail_todo_undefined_impl.carbon`
* `toolchain/check/testdata/struct/import.carbon`
* `toolchain/check/testdata/tuple/import.carbon`

The last two are due to an import of generics bug exposed by this PR,
which will be fixed in a follow-on.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2025-01-02 23:03:11 +00:00
Richard Smith 79ba184dab Provide a location for monomorphization failures resulting from TryToCompleteType. (#4670)
Almost all callers actually could never fail and nearly all of those
already `CHECK`-failed on failure. Add a new overload for that case, and
add a location parameter for the one remaining call.
2024-12-12 00:44:07 +00:00
Richard Smith 758b6c42ba Produce a note indicating where the specific was used from if monomorphization fails. (#4662)
Also fix a bug in `Context::GetClassType` that previously tried to
complete the class type before returning it. That's not correct --
`GetCompleteTypeImpl` is only appropriate for cases where the type can
trivially be completed and completing it can't fail -- and led to
infinite recursion with this change because we would call `GetClassType`
when producing a diagnostic if completing that class type failed.
2024-12-11 22:34:10 +00:00
Richard Smith eabe9f117a Track complete types required by a generic. (#4652)
When a generic requires a symbolic type to be complete, add a new
`require_complete_type` instruction to the generic eval block. During
monomorphization of such an instruction, require that type to be
complete.
2024-12-10 03:00:28 +00:00
33110d096c Facet types support rewrite (where .A =...) constraints (#4613)
* Rewrite constraints are stored in a facet type, substituted, imported,
and formatted.
* We now distinguish `.Self` from other symbolic bindings in two ways:
* `.Self` itself now has an invalid compile time binding index (since it
doesn't bind to any of the generic parameters). As a result, we no
longer need to create a generic region in `handle_where.cpp`.
* There is a new phase tracking values that are only symbolic because
they transitively depend on `.Self`. This allows us to give the result
of a `where` expression template phase as long as it doesn't use any
symbolic constants other than `.Self` or other designators.
* `AddConstant` has been removed from `check/context` since it was only
used from `eval`. This meant less plumbing of the phase change.
* Evaluation of `BindSymbolicName` now also performs substitution into
its type.
* Include a bit more information in some diagnostics.
* `StringifyTypeExpr` outputs rewrites, which required adding support
for associated entities as well.
  * Associated entities now have an entity name set when importing.
* Adds tests for some interesting cases with rewrites and uses of
`.Self` mixed with other symbolic constants.

Still to do:
* There is no validation that any particular type satisfies rewrite
constraints.
  * Access to members of a facet type do not see the rewritten values.
* Impls don't recognize whether associated constants have rewrites
setting their values.
  * No support for resolving facet types.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-12-03 22:44:39 +00:00
Geoff Romer 223c5cb04b Restructure handling of runtime parameters (#4422)
- Generate runtime indices as part of pattern matching, rather than as a
separate postprocessing/rewriting step.
- In contexts where runtime parameters aren't permitted, avoid emitting
insts for them to begin with, rather than trying to detect the problem
and rewrite the IR to remove them later on.
2024-10-21 19:53:38 +00:00
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins 9d942f4633 Generate parameter pattern-match IR from pattern IR (#4388)
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.

Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-10-16 19:15:29 +00:00
Richard Smith efb5d6d25a Assign locations to instructions in a generic eval block. (#4393)
The locations point to the first instruction in the generic that needed
the relevant constant value or type.

For now, this must makes the formatted SemIR a bit more useful, but in
the future it will also provide locations for diagnostics caused by
monomorphization failure.
2024-10-09 19:03:15 +00:00
82937e1a3c Change how to get info for a parameter (#4366)
Updates `SemIR::Function::GetParamFromParamRefId` to return more
information in the form of a new `ParamInfo` struct. This struct has a
method for getting the `NameId` from the name binding instruction. The
callers previously got it from the `Param` instruction, but the plan is
for that instruction to no longer be associated with a name.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
2024-10-04 16:30:00 +00:00
josh11bandJosh L d6d70bf80d Handle runtime implicit parameters, and self outside of methods (#4361)
Closes #4356, #4359

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-10-03 20:24:28 +00:00
Richard Smith 7f22a289b9 Push a generic region when handling a where expression. (#4340)
This fixes a crash in the case where a `where` expression appears
outside of any generic.
2024-09-26 00:24:38 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith e7aebbe581 Update basic diagnostic capitalization/punctuation (#4328)
This is a primarily automated change:

- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
    - `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
    - `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
    - ERROR -> error
    - WARNING -> warning

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-09-19 21:32:53 +00:00
Richard Smith 0354efa1fc Rework how we check calls to support deduced implicit parameters (#4302)
Instead of the `call` instruction having a block with one argument per
explicit argument, preceded optionally by `self` and followed optionally
by a return slot, change the `call` to store only the *runtime*
arguments. Store an index on the runtime parameters to make it easier to
determine the correspondence between arguments and parameters in a call.
Compile-time parameters, whether implicit or explicit, are no longer
included in the call argument list. Instead, they're tracked only in the
`specific_id` on the callee.

For calls to generic classes and generic interfaces, it no longer makes
sense to form a `call` instruction, given that the entirety of the
result is determined by the `specific_id`, which is now formed when
checking the call. Instead, the `call` instruction now only models
function calls, and not calls to other kinds of parameterized entity
names, and we create a `class_type` or `interface_type` instead of a
`call` instruction to model these kinds of calls. Notionally the model
here is that we're following the #3720 approach for calls, but for now
we inline the `Call.Op` function when forming SemIR.

We now also track the enclosing specific for a generic class or generic
interface that appears within an enclosing generic. This is necessary in
order for deduction of the inner generic parameters to not get confused
by the outer generic parameters being absent.

In order to not regress diagnostics, the template argument deduction
mechanism has been extended to specify the name of the parameter we're
deducing against when possible, and call arity mismatch errors are now
diagnosed before performing deduction rather than afterwards.
2024-09-13 21:31:43 +00:00
4845f40dff Switch CARBON_CHECK to a format string API (#4285)
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.

The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.

As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.

However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.

One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.

This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256      86.3µs ± 1%  82.9µs ± 1%  -3.94%  (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024      431µs ± 1%   415µs ± 1%  -3.76%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096     1.77ms ± 1%  1.71ms ± 1%  -3.18%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384    7.44ms ± 1%  7.17ms ± 2%  -3.56%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536    30.7ms ± 1%  29.7ms ± 1%  -3.15%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144    131ms ± 1%   127ms ± 1%  -2.81%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256       878µs ± 2%   800µs ± 1%  -8.91%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024     1.88ms ± 2%  1.72ms ± 1%  -8.56%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096     5.78ms ± 2%  5.28ms ± 1%  -8.70%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384    21.9ms ± 1%  20.1ms ± 1%  -8.02%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536    90.4ms ± 2%  83.1ms ± 1%  -8.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144    381ms ± 2%   352ms ± 1%  -7.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-12 16:42:08 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 891c7d8368 Enforce that the parse node for an instruction has the kind specified in the instruction definition (#4264)
Remove `ReusingLoc` and add enforcement that even for imported
locations, the kind of the parse node for an instruction matches the
kind specified in the instruction definition.

Change the node kind for a few instructions to `NodeId`:

- A couple of instructions had a typed node but could be created
implicitly with any node as part of a builtin implicit conversion. This
happened for `AddrOf`, `ArrayIndex`, and `Deref`.
- A bunch of instructions had `InvalidNodeId` as their associated parse
node kind but were actually always created with a location.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-08-29 21:10:14 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins a3a4c14960 Error on non-constant parameters to a type. (#4215)
At present, this is a crash bug. I don't know whether this is the best
fix, but I figure it'll work until zygoloid has a chance to look.
2024-08-13 18:35:10 +00:00
Richard Smith 3c8fc714a8 Import support for generics and specifics (#4179)
Import generics and specifics when they are referenced by imported
entities.

When importing a generic, we import the symbolic constants required by
its eval block, and then rebuild the eval block itself given the list of
constants it needs to compute. This is likely a bit less efficient than
directly importing the contents of the eval block, but avoids needing to
either extend the importer code to be able to import the instructions
that can appear in the eval block or extend the evaluator to cope with
instructions from a different `SemIR::File`.

Importing a symbolic constant is unaffected, and does not yet preserve
the associated generic and index within that generic, so uses of a
generic from an imported IR still don't pick up values from the
specific, but the improved functionality can be seen in the changes to
the SemIR in the testcases.
2024-07-31 23:53:14 +00:00
Richard Smith 3cb769a053 Rename "generic instance" to "specific" throughout the toolchain. (#4165)
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
2024-07-25 16:42:01 +00:00
Richard Smith fc8e686607 Rebuild all constants in the eval block. (#4155)
Instead of reusing instructions from the generic entity in the eval
block, rebuild constants in the same way we rebuild types. The previous
attempt to not rebuild these constants assumed that every constant used
in a generic would be built in that generic, and not referenced directly
or referenced from some enclosing scope, which isn't true in practice
and is a fragile assumption in any case.

We could add back some reuse of instructions from the generic -- if we
happen to see the right instruction to build a constant, we could
opportunistically reuse it -- but given the complexity added by doing
so, I'm not pursuing that here.

Now that the eval block for a generic consists of instructions uniquely
owned by that generic, rather than often being shared with another
entity, include the generic in the formatted SemIR output. I'm using the
same scope name for the generic object itself as for the parameterized
class / function / interface, because there are very frequently
references between them and this keeps the IR simpler and more readable,
and avoids needing to invent a second name for the scope.
2024-07-23 21:51:08 +00:00
Richard Smith 3cc90f9017 Move GetTypeInInstance from Check to SemIR. (#4144)
In preparation for this function being used by other parts of `SemIR`
and by lowering.
2024-07-17 23:27:14 +00:00
Richard Smith e6860d9930 Mark some leaf classes final to suppress -Wnon-virtual-dtor. (#4141) 2024-07-17 16:48:06 +00:00
Richard Smith fe359b1a08 Substitute into generic class and interface definitions when we require them to be fully defined. (#4139)
When referring to a constant within a specific, such as a field of a
generic class, use that specific version of the constant's value.
2024-07-17 01:39:25 +00:00
Richard Smith 5006838f1c Build an evaluation block for the definition region of a generic. (#4131) 2024-07-16 00:16:48 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins efea072be3 Compute specific constant values. (#4128)
When forming a specific (previously called a generic instance), evaluate
the eval block of the generic to determine the values of any constants
used in that specific. The majority of the work here is updating
eval.cpp so that it can use the results of prior evaluations in the same
block when computing later values.

Include the computed results in the formatted SemIR output.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-07-15 23:59:23 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 50d56aa7c9 Add an instruction to represent a use of a dependent value from a generic instance. (#4122)
We can't use the instruction from the generic directly, because it
doesn't have the right constant value. Instead add an instruction that
models the transition from the constant value in the generic to the
constant value in the generic instance.

Also start associating the self generic instance with unqualified
lookups that find results in an enclosing generic, so that we track the
information necessary to create the new instruction.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-07-12 14:59:01 +00:00
Richard Smith 6d3c915bbf When performing name lookup, determine the generic instance within which the lookup result was found. (#4118)
Require types into which qualified lookup is performed to be completely
defined. Eventually this will trigger substitution into the definition
for generic types.
2024-07-10 18:35:55 +00:00
Richard Smith 7322a1e220 Build a list of dependent constants to recompute in each instance of a generic. (#4110)
For each generic, build a list of instructions describing the
computations we need to do when resolving an instance of the generic:
this is a list of the instance-specific constants and types that the
generic uses. Another way of viewing this list is as a block of Carbon
SemIR code that is evaluated in order to form an instance of the generic
-- this is referenced in the code as the "eval block" for the generic.

For each instruction in the generic whose type or value is a symbolic
constant, replace that type or constant value with a symbolic reference
that says "to find the actual type or value, look at index N in the list
of values for the generic instance".

For an instruction with a symbolic constant value, we can just add that
instruction to our list. For an instruction with a symbolic constant
type, however, we may not have a corresponding instruction computing the
type within the generic and may need to build a new instruction, but
will reuse one where possible. In the case where we build a new
instruction, we use the existing substitution code to build the type
within the eval block.

For now, this transformation is only done in the declaration region of
the generic, not in the definition region. Also, we map back from the
symbolic references to the underlying constant value in a few places
where we will eventually need to do a lookup into a generic instance, in
order to avoid regressing the tests.
2024-07-08 22:29:37 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth d437e4bffe Create an array stack type for a shared use-case (#4100)
Based on discussion around the region handling in generic_region_stack,
create a generic structure for the stack-of-vectors support. I also want
to add this to InstBlockStack, but that's a little more complex due to
GlobalInit, so cutting a PR here to check with review.

My work here is how I noticed #4099; I want to be sure that I'm correct
about the issue, but it's the difference between being able to use
PeekArray or not.

Note in scope_stack.h, I believe we could remove next_compile_time_index
and make it just based on elements_size(). However, I want to verify
with you before I make further changes there.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2024-07-03 16:58:47 +00:00
Richard Smith fa11050961 Track a list of dependent instructions created within a generic (#4092)
When checking a declaration or definition of a generic, track a list of
created instructions that depend on the generic's parameters in some
way, along with information on how they depend on the parameters. This
will eventually be used to determine what information we need to compute
when creating instances of the generic, but for now we're just building
the list.

Information is tracked separately for the declaration region and the
definition region of the generic, because in general these may be first
provided in separate declarations, and they should be substituted into
at different times.
2024-07-01 20:33:44 +00:00
Richard Smith 10a198a9e6 Use the correct type for Self in generic classes and generic interfaces (#4087)
In a `class C(T:! type)`, the type `Self` should be `C(T)`, not merely
`C`. Similarly, in an `interface I(T:! type)`, the type of self should
be `I(T)`, not merely `I`.
2024-06-28 20:20:40 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 19c5596fd8 Build Generic objects for generic classes and interfaces. (#4086)
In `ClassType`s and `InterfaceType`s, track a `GenericInstanceId` for
the instance rather than just the argument list.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-06-27 20:22:10 +00:00