Emitting definitions in check. This resolves the crash in lowering which
necessitated definitions be emitted.
Some of the test changes need further review.
When performing a call through an impl witness, the callee that we
type-check against is the function in the interface, so we form a
specific for that callee. However, once the impl witness access
resolves, the eventual callee is a different function -- the function in
the impl -- so this would cause us to form a `SpecificFunction` where
the callee is one function but the specific refers to a different
function.
Address this by adding another instruction, `SpecificImplFunction`, that
takes a function in an impl and a specific for the corresponding
function in the interface, and computes and returns a `SpecificFunction`
referring to the corresponding specific function in the impl, or returns
a direct reference to the function in the `impl` if it's not a generic
function.
During SemIR, when identifying a specific in a specific context, we'd
have to either look through a specific or through a bound method.
Canonicalize which one to look through first, by having the BoundMethod
created around a SpecificFunction instead.
This changes a lot of check tests.
TODO: As the SemIr does not currently allow removal (access to insts()
is intentionally const), the bound instruction created prior to finding
the specific is not removed from the instructions.
Options: (1) leave as is, (2) add a way to remove the previous bound,
(3) rethink how/when the BoundMethod inst is created.
Resolve instruction id depending on the context from which a function is
called.
Calling a function in a function context that does not have a definition
emitted before reaching lowering will cause a crash. This needs a change
in check/eval layer.
- The actual reason I started this: minor lowering updates in the golden
LLVM IR
- Process.inc changed enough to need a patch context update.
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123126 added `proto_library`
uses without a `load`, which is broken in bazel 8
- Just commenting these out because we don't use them. I'll follow up
separately about a possible fix, but continuing to use `WORKSPACE` is a
bigger issue LLVM probably should address.
- Note this update is also triggering removal of `migrate_cpp`, in #4887
Include the index rather than the name in the fingerprint of a symbolic
binding. While both the index and the name contribute to the canonical
identity, using either one of them in the fingerprint is sufficient to
ensure that distinct entities get different fingerprints. Changing the
name of a symbolic binding should ideally not result in fingerprint
changes, so exclude the name from the fingerprint when we have an index.
Use the canonical type and constraint when fingerprinting an impl, so
that uses of names in `name_ref` instructions aren't considered, only
the entity the name resolves to, and different ways of spelling the same
type have the same fingerprint. This similarly allows compatible changes
to be made to impls without changing the fingerprint.
Exclude the declaration block when determining the fingerprint of a
declaration. The declaration block contains the declarations of
parameters of the declaration, which do affect whether two declarations
are identical, but not whether they denote the same entity, because it
would be invalid to have different declaration blocks for declarations
with the same name in the same scope. Therefore changes to the
declaration block are compatible, and it's useful for such changes to
not affect the fingerprint.
This is not easy to test in isolation with our current testing
machinery. However, a follow-on PR will change the name of a parameter
in the prelude, and with this in place, will not cause any changes to
occur elsewhere in the toolchain tests.
Instead of including the raw index of the specific, which is unstable
across files and across unrelated changes, use a fingerprint of the
constant values of the specific arguments. This is a placeholder until
we decide on how we want to mangle specific functions.
Add a builtin `"int.convert"` supporting unchecked conversions between
different integer types. This performs a truncation, zero-extension, or
sign-extension, depending on the widths of the operands and the
signedness of the source type. Add explicit `As` support to the prelude.
No implicit conversions are supported yet as we don't have a way to
express the constraint that we can only implicitly convert to wider
types.
Instead of providing operations only for `i32`, provide them for all
`iN` and `uN` types.
For now, this excludes the `*Assign`, `Inc` and `Dec` interfaces,
because the implementations for those are defined as Carbon functions
rather than builtins, and we can't yet lower definitions for specific
functions, so converting those to be generic breaks the build for our
examples.
Non-entry-block allocas will allocate new stack memory each time they're
reached, resulting in leaking stack memory over time for allocas in a
loop. Move all such allocas to the entry block instead, and use an LLVM
intrinsic to mark when the lifetime of the variable actually begins.
Instead of treating `Core.Int` as the toolchain's builtin `IntType`,
model it as a class that adapts the builtin type. This aligns us better
with the intended language model, gives an associated library for
`impl`s involving `Core.Int` to live within, and opens the door adding
member functions to `Core.Int` if we decide that is desirable.
Remarkably it also seems to make the formatted SemIR a little smaller,
because a call to a generic class generates less IR than a call to a
function.
Goal is to reduce churn in names in test updates (by churning a lot of
them in this PR).
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
For the few remaining uses of the builtin `i32` type, manually build an
`IntType(Signed, 32)` value instead. These are:
- The return type of `Run`.
- The type that int literals in an `if` expression are converted into.
- The type of an array index expression.
We should consider converting those three cases away from `i32` over
time.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
When an `IntLiteral` appears as an operand of an `if` expression,
convert it to `i32` for now, so that we don't reject things like `if
cond then 1 else 2` due to having a non-constant value of type
`IntLiteral`.
For tuple indexing expressions such as `(a, b).0`, convert the index to
type `IntLiteral`, not to type `i32`. This isn't strictly necessary to
do in this PR, but avoids the need to provide an `IntLiteral` -> `i32`
implicit conversion for `no_prelude` tests using this syntax.
In this case, the callee may be non-constant because it includes a
reference to `self`, so we need to be able to lower a non-constant
`specific_function`.
Generate declarations of specific functions on demand. Definitions are
not emitted yet, and I'm using a temporary, known-broken scheme for name
mangling.
This adds just the debug info metadata for Compilation Units (the top
level container of debug info) - but without anything in them, LLVM
won't emit them at all, so while this is testable at the IR level, it
isn't observable at the object level until more debug info is added.
A couple of starting points in this patch:
* A flag (`--debug-info`, seems to match the naming/style of other flags
in the carbon driver, though this is different from the naming
conventions of clang/gcc) that enables debug info when lowering. Open to
other names/approaches (on by default? historically debug info's been to
large/expensive to do this, so sticking with that precedent for now).
* Enabling that flag by default in the lowering tests - I do find the
churn on golden tests a bit rough, and adding more features to all the
tests means more churn, but it seems consistent with the approach so far
- keep an eye on this and perhaps revisit this if the churn gets too
annoying
---------
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This better follows the principle that types are simply constants of
type `type`, and allows more uniform treatment of types as just another
kind of constant from generics handling.
Use a hash table to map from `TypeId` to information about the complete
type. This makes basic operations on types a bit simpler, and operations
that actually need to access the complete class information a bit more
complex.
This has is a nice-to-have for me. Frequently I want to run a specific
test, and end up digging through output to be able to copy-paste the run
line. This uses TIP lines to inject the command into the file when using
AUTOUPDATE.
Note, one of the reasons I want this is because "bazel test
//toolchain/testing:file_test --test_output=all" has been regularly
exceeding bazel's output limit for me (workaround is either opening the
output file or specifying an obscure output limit flag), making it a
little harder for me to get the commands. However, frequently I'm adding
a file and want to iterate on it, so that's really the use case I have
in mind here.
Factor out `SemIR::InstNamer` and also use it when lowering to LLVM IR.
Automatically name all instructions created with our `IRBuilder` based
on the name computed by the `InstNamer`, and likewise name basic blocks
using the label generated by the `InstNamer`.
Move some of the existing naming logic out from lower into `InstNamer`
so that it's also used in SemIR. In particular, we now name call
instructions after their callee, or after the builtin name for calls to
builtins.
Computing and adding these names isn't completely free. This instruction
naming is designed to be optional, so that we can turn it off for builds
where the LLVM IR will only be converted to assembly and won't be seen
by a human, but so far it's enabled unconditionally. We can tune that
later as needed.
This change adds a `BindSymbolicName` instruction for generic bindings,
paralleling the existing `BindName`. A mechanism is also added to allow
both kinds of binding to be accessed uniformly, for convenience in the
case where the two different kinds of binding are treated the same.
Generic bindings of type `type` are allowed to be used as types,
although no operations are provided for such types. For now lowering
treats these types as empty structs, which seems like a reasonable
lowering for non-monomorphized unconstrained types.
Alina Sbirlea
Richard Smith
Jon Ross-Perkins
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L
