Commit Graph
15 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Dana Jansens fe020ee08b Make FacetAccessType evaluate to SymbolicBindingType for type-of a BindSymbolicName (#6115)
The SymbolicBindingType refers to the type value that will be
substituted in for the BindSymbolicName, but holds onto the EntityNameId
from the BindSymbolicName instead of (or in addition to, for now) the
instruction.

The EntityNameId will be used to look in the ScopeStack to find the
witnesses either from the BindSymbolicName instruction, or other
instructions that specify `impls` constraints against the EntityName.

This will allow us to have the `T` in `I(T)` resolve to a `.Self`
reference in the type so that we get type equality with the binding's
type: `T:! I(.Self)`.
2025-10-06 18:56:43 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 49ba8cf3e1 Switch class to use a blanket impl for Destroy (#6125)
Right now, the class destroy impl is incorrectly generated (first
discussed [in
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/941071822756143115/1418614787449032826)).
If we want it to be correct, deferred definition logic would need to be
added, and the declaration would need to be moved inside the `class`
scope (along with whatever generic logic that needs).

This instead switches to a blanket impl, to avoid creating latent bugs
with generating the `impl` and function body in the wrong scope. This
approach uses the same blanket impl as aggregate destruction that was
added by #6098.

The intent here is to allow progress on other parts of `Destroy`. For
example, under this model the implementation of the function body could
be done as part of lowering the specific.
2025-09-29 16:05:06 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 9704dc670e Change the Destroy blanket impls to be more specific (#6098)
The main direction of this change is the edits to `destroy.carbon`
(matching in both prelude and min_prelude).

Previously there was a no-op blanket impl for `Destroy`, which hid all
missing implementations of `Destroy`. This does a few things:

- Sets up builtin aggregate destruction for struct and tuple types as
before, but also adds C++ class types and array types to the same
handling. (all as a TODO for actual implementation)
- Also maybe-unformed destruction, for now at least. (there's a chance I
may try a different approach on this, but the impl lookup wasn't working
as I'd hope in order to write it in code)
- Adds handlers for simple things that are easy to do in code: `type`,
`bool`, pointers. (because these are no-op destruction)
- Redirect `const T` destruction to `T` destruction.

This leaves as future issues:

- `partial T` destruction. (this can't be done similar to `const`
because it only works for non-`final` class types; I think `class`
definitions should just generate what's needed)
- Destruction of other prelude-provided types. (will probably come up as
we implement class destruction, that the adapted builtin type doesn't
implement `Destroy` -- but may end up special-casing that in a way that
moots it)

This moves the `&` operator from `facet_types.carbon` to
`convert.carbon` because more things need to handle type and now that
we're getting separate copy and destroy interfaces. It should be
low-cost (an interface and builtin) so hopefully this is the right
balance for complexity and re-use.

A few tests are also edited in order to focus them more on what they
intend to test, and avoid a `Destroy` dependency.
2025-09-18 22:10:50 +00:00
Richard Smith b44ba47cf3 Don't treat dependent types as having a copy value representation. (#6055)
Add `Dependent` value and initializing representations for types whose
representations are unknown because they are dependent. When generating
SemIR in such cases, use a worst-case initializing representation that
both provides a destination address and also propagates a potential
result value.

Use this to fix incorrect lowering and lowering crashes for specific
functions involving generic types that don't use a copy value
representation.

In lowering, be careful to distinguish between whether the initializing
representation for the generic return type uses a return slot (which
affects whether the SemIR declaration and call have one) and whether the
initializing representation for the specific return type uses a return
slot (which affects whether the LLVM IR declaration and call have one).
2025-09-15 23:59:00 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandDana Jansens 5e3bb523f8 Add builtin functions for destroy, with special requirements in facet types (#6035)
This is in support of a goal of changing the blanket `destroy` impl to
use (roughly):

```
private fn CanAggregateDestroy() -> type = "type.can_aggregate_destroy";

// Handles aggregate type destruction.
impl forall [AggregateDestroyT:! CanAggregateDestroy()] AggregateDestroyT as Destroy {
  fn Op[addr self: Self*]() = "type.aggregate_destroy";
}
```

That isn't done here because there's still other issues that migrating
raises. What this *does* do is add the builtin functions, and in
particular, support to `FacetTypeInfo` to make `CanAggregateDestroy`
work.

The "special requirement" approach in `FacetTypeInfo` allows us to
support restricting a blanket impl under the current approach of impls.
Maybe we'll find a cleaner approach that can work in the future, but
this fits into the current model by propagating similar to other
requirements. I'm using an enum mask because we have a number of similar
things to add (e.g. copy, move) but I'm not sure we need a full vector.

A few alternatives considered were:

- Supporting syntax more like `where .Self impls
TypeCanAggregateDestroy(.Self, SupportedInterface,
UnsupportedInterface)`. I think it'd be a little cleaner, but requires
better compile-time evaluation in order to assess the type of the call.
Right now it's expected to be a `FacetType` too early to make this work,
and I was concerned about pouring too much more time down this route.
- Providing an actual interface, in particular doing name lookup back
into `Core.` for an interface. This would've added name lookup overhead,
and the question of whether an `impl` exists.
- Generating an interface. This avoids the name lookup, but would still
raise the question of whether an `impl` should also be generated. Work
I've previously done generating interfaces for class destruction also
feels complex to both write and understand (an unfortunate issue).
- Still modeling as an `ImplsConstraint`, for example by defining a
special `InterfaceId::CanAggregateDestroy = -2` similar to what we do on
other ids. I was hesitant because of how this expands the number of
modes of `InterfaceId`, and things for consuming code to watch out for,
for what feels like a relatively niche set of use-cases that are only
interface-like.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
2025-09-15 17:03:43 +00:00
Richard Smith d60900cbeb Remove special case for returning value expressions by copy (#6052)
When returning a value from a function whose return type has a by-copy
initializing representation, perform initialization like we do when the
return type has an in-place initializing representation. This makes our
SemIR representation more uniform, as the return expression will now
always be an initializing expression rather than a value expression, but
more importantly it means that attempts to return a non-copyable type by
value now fail, even if the type has a by-copy initializing
representation.

This catches a bunch of places where we were returning a value of an
unconstrained template parameter `T:! type`, which we were incorrectly
allowing because we didn't notice it was not copyable. Unfortunately
this then requires quite a few test updates.

Like #6034, this exposes a lowering issue where lowering crashes when
attempting to lower a specific copy operation for certain types; a
couple more tests are temporarily disabled here. An upcoming PR
dependent on this one will fix the issue and re-enable those tests.
2025-09-12 00:13:33 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 0a679504a5 Update LLVM again to 2025-08-09 (#5958)
This lets us pick up another API update to creating lifetimes, as well
as the consequent test updates.
2025-08-14 19:19:27 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 4aa62bf5cd Switch Destroy to addr self (#5748)
Pointed out by zygoloid on #toolchain, just taking care of this now.
2025-06-28 00:50:47 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 0722dab0ef Reimplement destroy as an interface (#5678)
This changes `Destroy` to use an interface for its implementation.

Note that this change includes a lot of test updates. Even when
`Destroy` is a no-op, it still causes code generation as part of
determining that.

Originally I was trying to use ranges to cut down the scope of this, and
to a degree I think they have. But a flipside here is that cases where
no destructors should be generated -- particularly globals -- would be
needed to completely remove destructor calls. Even for ranges, the range
can often include the destructor placement. So I've shifted
frame-of-thought a little: accept a bunch of destructor churn, because
destructors are needed and will be prevalent. The verbosity is a feature
of the design to make desugaring apparent in IR, not a bug.
2025-06-27 21:57:14 +00:00
Dana Jansens bff601e417 Add min-preludes to most of lowering and a few more slow tests (#5680)
Adds min-preludes to a few more slowest tests, and adds them to most of
the lowering tests, with a few exceptions that make use of operators.
This take the runtime of file_test down from about 8s to about 7s on my
machine.

We add support for Negate on uints in the min-preludes.
2025-06-17 20:43:31 +00:00
Richard Smith 42c783defa Use linkonce_odr linkage for specific functions. (#5575)
The same specific function will (eventually) be emitted as part of
lowering multiple different source files, so don't give them unique
external linkage.
2025-05-29 20:16:37 +00:00
Richard Smith 32e68cfb5b Fix debug location for variable allocas and lifetime markers. (#5432)
`IRBuilderBase::SetInsertPoint` weirdly replaces our debug location with
one copied from the new insertion point, so undo its damage after
calling it.

Also included: a couple of cleanups I made while tracking this down.
2025-05-06 21:26:59 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 3ccb0b82f8 Add/update lowering tests. (#5254)
Add lowering tests for future redesign.
2025-04-08 17:26:16 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 077cf56a8a Emit function definitions in check, for all specifics seen. (#5090)
Emitting definitions in check. This resolves the crash in lowering which
necessitated definitions be emitted.
Some of the test changes need further review.
2025-04-02 21:51:25 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea d3869a529b Continue: emit function definitions for specifics. (#5068)
Resolve instruction id depending on the context from which a function is
called.

Calling a function in a function context that does not have a definition
emitted before reaching lowering will cause a crash. This needs a change
in check/eval layer.
2025-03-06 17:40:35 +00:00