This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Remove `ReusingLoc` and add enforcement that even for imported
locations, the kind of the parse node for an instruction matches the
kind specified in the instruction definition.
Change the node kind for a few instructions to `NodeId`:
- A couple of instructions had a typed node but could be created
implicitly with any node as part of a builtin implicit conversion. This
happened for `AddrOf`, `ArrayIndex`, and `Deref`.
- A bunch of instructions had `InvalidNodeId` as their associated parse
node kind but were actually always created with a location.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Import generics and specifics when they are referenced by imported
entities.
When importing a generic, we import the symbolic constants required by
its eval block, and then rebuild the eval block itself given the list of
constants it needs to compute. This is likely a bit less efficient than
directly importing the contents of the eval block, but avoids needing to
either extend the importer code to be able to import the instructions
that can appear in the eval block or extend the evaluator to cope with
instructions from a different `SemIR::File`.
Importing a symbolic constant is unaffected, and does not yet preserve
the associated generic and index within that generic, so uses of a
generic from an imported IR still don't pick up values from the
specific, but the improved functionality can be seen in the changes to
the SemIR in the testcases.
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
Instead of reusing instructions from the generic entity in the eval
block, rebuild constants in the same way we rebuild types. The previous
attempt to not rebuild these constants assumed that every constant used
in a generic would be built in that generic, and not referenced directly
or referenced from some enclosing scope, which isn't true in practice
and is a fragile assumption in any case.
We could add back some reuse of instructions from the generic -- if we
happen to see the right instruction to build a constant, we could
opportunistically reuse it -- but given the complexity added by doing
so, I'm not pursuing that here.
Now that the eval block for a generic consists of instructions uniquely
owned by that generic, rather than often being shared with another
entity, include the generic in the formatted SemIR output. I'm using the
same scope name for the generic object itself as for the parameterized
class / function / interface, because there are very frequently
references between them and this keeps the IR simpler and more readable,
and avoids needing to invent a second name for the scope.
When forming a specific (previously called a generic instance), evaluate
the eval block of the generic to determine the values of any constants
used in that specific. The majority of the work here is updating
eval.cpp so that it can use the results of prior evaluations in the same
block when computing later values.
Include the computed results in the formatted SemIR output.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
We can't use the instruction from the generic directly, because it
doesn't have the right constant value. Instead add an instruction that
models the transition from the constant value in the generic to the
constant value in the generic instance.
Also start associating the self generic instance with unqualified
lookups that find results in an enclosing generic, so that we track the
information necessary to create the new instruction.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Require types into which qualified lookup is performed to be completely
defined. Eventually this will trigger substitution into the definition
for generic types.
For each generic, build a list of instructions describing the
computations we need to do when resolving an instance of the generic:
this is a list of the instance-specific constants and types that the
generic uses. Another way of viewing this list is as a block of Carbon
SemIR code that is evaluated in order to form an instance of the generic
-- this is referenced in the code as the "eval block" for the generic.
For each instruction in the generic whose type or value is a symbolic
constant, replace that type or constant value with a symbolic reference
that says "to find the actual type or value, look at index N in the list
of values for the generic instance".
For an instruction with a symbolic constant value, we can just add that
instruction to our list. For an instruction with a symbolic constant
type, however, we may not have a corresponding instruction computing the
type within the generic and may need to build a new instruction, but
will reuse one where possible. In the case where we build a new
instruction, we use the existing substitution code to build the type
within the eval block.
For now, this transformation is only done in the declaration region of
the generic, not in the definition region. Also, we map back from the
symbolic references to the underlying constant value in a few places
where we will eventually need to do a lookup into a generic instance, in
order to avoid regressing the tests.
Based on discussion around the region handling in generic_region_stack,
create a generic structure for the stack-of-vectors support. I also want
to add this to InstBlockStack, but that's a little more complex due to
GlobalInit, so cutting a PR here to check with review.
My work here is how I noticed #4099; I want to be sure that I'm correct
about the issue, but it's the difference between being able to use
PeekArray or not.
Note in scope_stack.h, I believe we could remove next_compile_time_index
and make it just based on elements_size(). However, I want to verify
with you before I make further changes there.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
When checking a declaration or definition of a generic, track a list of
created instructions that depend on the generic's parameters in some
way, along with information on how they depend on the parameters. This
will eventually be used to determine what information we need to compute
when creating instances of the generic, but for now we're just building
the list.
Information is tracked separately for the declaration region and the
definition region of the generic, because in general these may be first
provided in separate declarations, and they should be substituted into
at different times.
In a `class C(T:! type)`, the type `Self` should be `C(T)`, not merely
`C`. Similarly, in an `interface I(T:! type)`, the type of self should
be `I(T)`, not merely `I`.
In `ClassType`s and `InterfaceType`s, track a `GenericInstanceId` for
the instance rather than just the argument list.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
