Splits IR files into SemIR, and logic files into Check. These will be
split into separate directories as part of a later move; the namespaces
are being done first in order to vet the switch, and hopefully make
conflicts a little easier to manage due to the substantial renames.
A lot of this is just automated removal of Semantics prefixes from
names, adding namespace references where needed. A few special-cases
are:
- SemanticsIR -> SemIR::File
- A few things were discussed, like Unit, CompileUnit, or CompiledUnit.
Unit was too vague for chandlerc, and I thought CompileUnit might lead
to incorrect inferences (CompilationUnit would be more precise, but
typically written as SemIR::CompilationUnit which is pretty long). File
seemed to be a short name that we could agree on.
- SemanticsIRFormatter -> SemIR::Formatter
- FormatSemanticsIR -> SemIR::FormatFile
- SemanticsFileTest -> CheckFileTest
- It remains in the Testing namespace, where just "FileTest" might be
too broad a name.
- SemanticsDeclarationNameStack::Context ->
Check::DeclarationNameStack::NameContext
- This avoids a Check::Context name shadowing.
Changes check_internal.h to include ostream.h to improve finding of
Print/operator<< (otherwise it didn't compile).
This is part of #3070
This removes BindName, putting name information directly on VarStorage.
As a side-effect of updating semantics_ir_test for this change, I also
noted that function bodies were being generated as invalid YAML so am
fixing that (just `{}` to `[]` bracketing, otherwise the test wouldn't
work anymore).
Because names are now available, I've updated lowering to use them for
vars.
In the SemIR formatter, the name is now repeated because it's a
parameter to VarStorage. I believe this is just default behavior, and
we'd have to special-case VarStorage to remove it because it's automatic
argument printing in action. On the balance, it felt like letting it
print was reasonable.
I've noted in places that the name on VarStorage is expected to be
optional, but am not adding support because I'd have no way of testing
it at present.
This adds a distinction between Unused and SoloParseNode, rather than
equating the two. This is intended to help identify nodes which are
getting pushed but maybe don't need to be.
Not totally done because I want to adjust declaration name handling due
to a quirk with how it mixes Name with Expression, but almost done. Once
that's done the type punning will be completely gone.
I think there's more we can do here, but this seemed like a good
checkpoint to make sure the path I'm going down is roughly what you
expected. There's one actual edit in if expression structure to match
the increased enforcement.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith