Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeremy G. Siek ac0b810bf3 Adds basic support for class functions and methods. (#1057)
* adding methods to the ast

* pre commit stuff?

* implementation of class functions

* implemented methods

* some cleanup

* more cleanup

* add newlines in test programs

* pre-commit fixups

* added include of return_term.h

* a test of a method calling another method

* replacing Member with Declaration

* removing the member.h etc files

* clarify a type annotation

* update uses of FunctionDeclaration

* remove ReturnTarget, no longer needed

* more cleanup

* more cleanup

* yet more cleanup, playing with pre-commit

* did a pre-commit run --all-files

* fixed const issue

* remove comment

* checking dependencies in BUILD files and headers

* pre-commit working now

* refactor NominalClassType to just hold a pointer to the class declaration

* remove Member from rtti

* responding to Geoffreys review

* change field_types to a non-member function
2022-02-05 12:30:13 -05:00
Geoff Romer 7a5b8434c8 Define a base class for all AST nodes. (#947)
Also implement code-generation to manage the resulting boilerplate.
2021-11-16 11:54:47 -08:00
Geoff Romer d854fb93cb Factor out AST node for function return types. (#912)
This enables us to stop treating the return type as a Pattern (which is really isn't), treat return types more consistently with other static types in the typechecker, and drop ReturnTypeContext.

Additional changes:
- Merge TypeCheckFunDef with TypeOfFunDef.
- Handle implicit conversions in `return` statements.
- Require function type literals to have an explicit `->`.
- Move consistency check for omitted returns from TypeChecker to ResolveControlFlow.
2021-11-12 11:30:31 -08:00
Jon Meow 904774fbb8 Collapse Sequence into Block. (#927) 2021-11-01 14:59:39 -07:00
Jon Meow bbd4940e6d Be more explicit about AST types (#921)
This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins.

There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax.

Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.
2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00
Geoff RomerandJon Meow 3bec7f8dc0 Unify Action and Scope stacks, and eliminate Frame (#880)
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-21 14:55:41 -07:00