We can end up emitting the same thunk from multiple compilations in some
cases -- in particular, when the thunk is wrapping a function that is
either synthesized by the compiler or imported from C++. When this
happens, we will have multiple-definition link errors unless we allow
redefinitions across multiple files.
It'd be nice to detect when we need to do this and when we don't, but
that's a bit tricky to do in practice. Ideally, in fact, we would use a
different strategy, and emit the thunks as discardable definitions in
each compilation that *uses* them. But for now emitting them with
weak_odr linkage seems like a good way to make progress.
Instead of tracking the cleanup scope depth on entry to each scope,
track an "ambient" cleanup scope depth that's *after* the destructors of
local variables in that scope. This gets increased to include the
destructors of local variables when we create a name-binding
declaration. Then, when we reach a point where temporaries should be
destroyed, run cleanups that are after the ambient cleanup scope depth
on the stack. This happens:
* At the `;` of a statement expression.
* At the `)` of an `if` or `while` statement.
* After performing the implied `HasValue()` call in a `for` statement.
Per informal agreement with leads, this means we lifetime-extend all
temporaries created in the initializer of a name-binding declaration to
the full scope of that declaration, but that temporaries created in an
expression statement are destroyed at the `;`.
Fix a few API issues. There's also a newly-added file in compiler-rt
that is not supposed to be built by default but is not being excluded
properly by a glob. Added a patch to exclude that and sent
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208861 upstream.
Each file dump now starts with a `; ---` comment and ends with a blank
line. This makes it easier to visually scan the dump for a file of
interest. The comment format is somewhat arbitrary; I chose `---` to
align with the `--- filename.carbon` separator in SemIR dumps, but
without the filename, because that appears on each of the next two lines
already.
Richard Smith
Geoff Romer
David Blaikie