Adds a unit test, and some smaller edits:
- Remove the `=` when defining names, in order to change `}` placement
by clang-format on uses.
- context:
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/6053#discussion_r2343423178
- I believe with `EnumBase` that keeping the `=` had been a deliberate
choice, so this PR is intended to confirm that removing it is okay.
- Delete `EnumMaskBase::name`
- context:
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/6053#discussion_r2344233707
- We can't just do nothing because `EnumBase::name` uses indexing that's
incompatible with `EnumMaskBase`.
- Some small comment cleanups.
- Tests don't need to be in the `Carbon` namespace anymore, macros work
fine in other namespaces, but it's still the right namespace.
- Documentation on `EnumBase::name` seems to be referring to a prior
structure, wherein we had a macro defining the function instead of the
`Names` array.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This adds support for most of the remaining LLVM command line tools
using a generic, generated wrapper. The subcommand interface for these
is (much) less interesting than our other subcommands, but it gives us
a uniform and consistent layer.
Note that I structured these as nested sub-sub-commands below an `llvm`
subcommand because of an expectation that we will want to add more, and
ones that don't use this generic layer. Some concrete future work:
- Add the `opt` and `llc` tools as subcommands for easier debugging and
experimentation with LLVM IR output from Carbon's toolchain.
- Potentially sink `lld` below the `llvm` layer given that it has
significantly less user visibility than commands like `clang`.
Unfortunately, the current driver subcommand APIs make nested
subcommands awkward. I've added a somewhat rough hack here to let the
LLVM tools go in, but there are some TODOs that I want to address in
a follow-up that works to adjust the structure of this code to be more
conducive to nesting like this.
Depends on #5048 -- only the last commit should be reviewed here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith
Chandler CarruthandGeoff Romer