Just spotted these while looking at warnings that seem to fire on our
code are probably are things we'd fix if we saw them. None of these seem
important FWIW.
Also removes a redundant flag that is part of `-Wall`.
I have a follow-up for the high-value warning I spotted that motivated
me to look at all of this. But it's noisy so kept it as a separate PR.
Instead of tracking the token associated with a parse node in the `.def`
file macro, track it on the typed node instead. List the token as a
field inside the node structure to show the order of the token relative
to the other components of the grammar production, and to allow the
token index to be accessed when the node is extracted.
Remove the corresponding information from the `.def` file, leaving
behind just a list of parse node kinds in the majority of cases.
This also removes the checking of the token kind associated with a parse
node in the case where the parse node has errors. Previously we had a
flag on the node kind to indicate whether we should check this, but per
[discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1246214418979881052),
we have decided to remove this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add a mechanism to define instruction categories, to support inspecting
the common representation of similar kinds of instruction. Use that
mechanism to make formatting of branch instructions slightly more
type-safe.
The idea here is to use the existing `Inst` mechanism for converting to
and from structs, extended to operate on a struct representing multiple
different kinds of instruction. In this case, the concrete kind of
instruction is stored in the struct in a `kind` field, rather than being
implied by the type.
Factored out of #3555 where this mechanism is used to provide a common
interface for runtime and symbolic name bindings.
These are intended to allow the structure of a parse tree node to be
described more precisely in code, to support these use cases:
- Automated checking that the parse tree conforms to the expected
structure. (Added to `Tree::Verify`.)
- Easier reading and understanding of the structure of the parse tree by
toolchain developers. (See `parse/typed_nodes.h`.)
- Easier navigation of the parse tree, for example for tooling uses and
for use when forming diagnostics.
On this last point, an object representing the file may be inspecting
using `Tree::ExtractFile`, as in:
```
auto file = tree->ExtractFile();
for (AnyDeclId decl_id : file.decls) {
// `decl_id` is convertible to a `NodeId`.
if (std::optional<FunctionDecl> fn_decl =
tree->ExtractAs<FunctionDecl>(decl_id)) {
// fn_decl->params is a `TuplePatternId` (which extends `NodeId`)
// that is guaranteed to reference a `TuplePattern`.
std::optional<TuplePattern> params = tree->Extract(fn_decl->params);
// `params` has a value unless there was an error in that node.
} else if (auto class_def = tree->ExtractAs<ClassDefinition>(decl_id)) {
// ...
}
}
```
The `Extract...` functions collect the child nodes into the typed parse
node's fields (internally using a `Tree::SiblingIterator`) for easy
access. However, this is not as fast as directly observing the tree
structure using the postorder strategy being used by the check stage.
These functions rely on using struct reflection on the typed parse node
definitions from `parse/typed_nodes.h` to get the expected structure of
child nodes and then populate them.
Note that validating these in `Tree::Verify` adds significant cost to
it, and is currently included in the parsing stage. Without this change,
a 10 mloc test case of lex & parse takes 4.129 s ± 0.041 s. With this
change, it takes 5.768 s ± 0.036 s.
This builds upon and completes #3393.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Choosing to make the constructor explicit in the test, rather than
NOLINT, because it seems to better reflect how our code is usually
written (and may be more likely to trip an issue).
Replace `SemIR::Node::GetAsFoo` and `SemIR::Node::Foo::Make` with
`SemIR::Foo` class that represents a particular kind of node, with named
fields.
Rename `SemIR::IntegerLiteral` and `SemIR::RealLiteral` to
`IntegerValue` / `RealValue` to better reflect their purpose and avoid a
name collision with the corresponding `SemIR` node kinds.
Remove `NodeKind::Invalid` and the `SemIR::Node` default constructor
entirely, as they were not used for anything.
Chandler Carruth
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins
