This helps us move away from the clone-with-modifications approach to
thunking, which gets unwieldy as signatures get more complex.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Use the Carbon-computed alignment for allocas, loads, stores, and
memcpys. Previously we used whatever LLVM felt like giving us, which
would result in ABI mismatches and runtime crashes due to misalignment
when creating objects of imported C++ class types, as well as resulting
in some surprising choices like `(i32, i32)` and `()` having 8-byte
alignment instead of 4 and 1, respectively.
When an initializing expression is used to initialize a var parameter,
we need to create the storage earlier in SemIR than the initializing
expression. To do so, pass a pending block to initialization containing
the var storage.
Also stop using `temporary` for this purpose, since we treat temporaries
as potentially-constant and immutable, but `var` parameters can be
mutated by the callee. We should ideally introduce a new kind of
instruction for this purpose but for now we just use `var_storage`.
Instead of allowing lower to pick whatever type layout it desires,
compute the layouts of types as part of completing the type, and make
lower build types that match that representation.
For now we assume that all pointers are 64-bit, since we don't have
access to target information. We allow tail padding reuse for structs
and tuple types (and by extension, for classes, since they use structs
as their object representation), but not for arrays.
In order to build matching LLVM types, we create LLVM packed structs
where necessary, and we insert inter-field padding on the end of the
previous field so that GEP indexes still always match Carbon's
ElementIndexes.
We don't yet use the computed alignment much in LLVM IR generation -- in
particular, `alloca`s, `load`s, and `store`s should probably use the
computed type alignment, but don't.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
This is needed to model things like the category of `x` in the body of
`fn Foo(F:! Core.Form, x:? F)`, where the category of `x` is determined
by the concrete value of `F` (see #5389 for the design of `:?`
bindings).
This will be used in a follow-up PR.
The primary change in this PR is to split the `Initializing` expression
category into separate `ReprInitializing` and `InPlaceInitializing`
categories, depending on whether initialization uses the types
initializing representation, or is guaranteed to be in place. It also
rationalizes and documents the SemIR-level semantics of those categories
(including where #5545's "ephemeral entire reference" category will
fit), and introduces two new inst kinds to close gaps exposed in the
process.
Some additional secondary changes:
- Consistently format the storage arguments of initializers with `to`,
regardless of whether initialization is in-place, and document the `to`
notation.
- Rename some inst kinds and functions, and restructure some of the
code, for clarity and consistency with the new documentation.
- Resolve a TODO to handle more category conversions in
`CategoryConverter`, in order to make it easier to reason about category
conversions.
See #6588 and the review history of this PR for background.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Add a new builtin function `cpp.std.initializer_list.make` that takes an
array and returns a `std::initializer_list`, initialized to refer to
that array. When C++ initialization wants to perform a
`std::initializer_list`-from-array construction, synthesize a
declaration of a matching builtin function and use that to perform the
initialization.
Ideally we would specify this conversion as an impl of `ImplicitAs` in
the prelude instead of hardcoding it in the interop layer, but
unfortunately that's not currently possible, for various reasons -- we
can't make the conversion form-generic, we can't deduce the array length
from the initializer, and we can't deduce against the arguments of
imported C++ class templates yet -- so for now synthesizing a builtin
function on demand is the best we can do.
Assisted-by: Gemini 3 Pro via Antigravity
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith