carbon-lang

carbon-language/carbon-lang

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git synced 2026-09-25 19:40:11 +01:00

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jon Meow	beea60d0b8	Switch prelude to a file and refactor lit testing to pass commands directly. (#966 )	2021-12-03 14:23:13 -08:00
Jon Meow	6d822ababb	Rename main to Main for Carbon style consistency (#939 ) Main() is more consistency with Carbon's naming guidelines. C# offers some precedent: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/program-structure/main-command-line	2021-11-02 14:53:18 -07:00
Jon Meow	bbd4940e6d	Be more explicit about AST types (#921 ) This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins. There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax. Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.	2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Jon Meow

beea60d0b8

Switch prelude to a file and refactor lit testing to pass commands directly. (#966 )

2021-12-03 14:23:13 -08:00

Jon Meow

6d822ababb

Rename main to Main for Carbon style consistency (#939 )

Main() is more consistency with Carbon's naming guidelines. C# offers some precedent: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/program-structure/main-command-line

2021-11-02 14:53:18 -07:00

Jon Meow

bbd4940e6d

Be more explicit about AST types (#921 )

This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins.

There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax.

Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.

2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00