This doesn't actually use the results of name resolution, but it does verify that they are present.
Also ensures that name resolution and type checking are applied to deduced function parameters and the implicit call to `Main()`.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
This enables us to stop treating the return type as a Pattern (which is really isn't), treat return types more consistently with other static types in the typechecker, and drop ReturnTypeContext.
Additional changes:
- Merge TypeCheckFunDef with TypeOfFunDef.
- Handle implicit conversions in `return` statements.
- Require function type literals to have an explicit `->`.
- Move consistency check for omitted returns from TypeChecker to ResolveControlFlow.
This starts detecting naming collisions as a consequence of being able to determine when the name is declared twice in a given scope.
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins.
There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax.
Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.
Arguably missed in #769
Note, this is reminding me we have more class members to rename for `_`, but I felt it's best to use the new naming instead of adding more to clean up.
Rationale: Based on the status of #478 and #505, Carbon won't have this feature for a while, and it will be simpler not to support it on spec in the meantime.
This does a mass rename of:
- `SourceLoc()` -> `source_loc()` for property naming
- `loc` -> `source_loc_` for underscore+consistency
- Generally changing function args to `source_loc` for consistency
- `Tag()` -> `kind()` for property naming and `Kind` parity
- `tag` -> `kind_` for underscore
Also renames `Pos` and `Results` on `Action`. These are a bit of an exception in that most base classes only have `Tag` and maybe `SourceLoc`, whereas `Action` has a little more. I felt okay having `source_loc()` and `kind()` on the base class where children do `Exp()` and the like, but it felt weird to me to mix it on the same class.
The reason for doing this cross-class in one PR is so that I can do it efficiently with a global replace in the codebase, rather than e.g. changing `Expression` but having to read through compiler errors to determine where it's calling `Expression`'s `Tag` versus a different `Tag`. The end result should be equivalent.
The code is pretty intertwined: having the AST be truly mutable means (to me) changing parser.ypp to return non-const values, but then the way things are passed around between objects should be non-const (particularly an issue with lists), which then creates issues with construction of lists in the TypeChecker, which then TypeChecker needs to mostly be non-const.
Due to the difficulties in breaking this apart, whereas I'd previously considering refactoring accessor naming in the same PR, I've largely avoided doing so. The intent is then that this PR focuses mainly on const -> non-const AST behavior.
call_main moves out of interpreter.cpp so that interpreter.cpp can receive a fully const AST.
With this, only main.cpp instantiates an arena. Maybe we'll want to split that up more later (e.g., so that the runtime interpreter uses its own arena), but given the intent to have type-checking update the AST, I thought this was a reasonable approach for now in order to avoid ownership complexities.
Fixes#769
Doesn't add much logic, only takes advantage of parser structure for the ordering enforcement.
Note import_nonexistent tests should probably fail, but writing import tests needs a chain of functionality, and I figured I'd just start adding some to validate the syntax (not adding existent imports because that'd require multi-file structure).
Geoff RomerandJon Meow