Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon Ross-Perkins 1497e1333d Switch types to a SemanticsTypeId. (#2854)
This switches types to using SemanticsTypeId instead of SemanticsNodeId, and lowering pre-builds its list of types. The empty tuple type is special-cased because we don't want to emit it unless it's in-use, but as the implicit return for functions, it's frequently used. Callables use invalid to indicate the implicit return, and that seems undesirable to change due to the size increase.
2023-05-26 11:19:49 -07:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 76151d1fff Stop special-casing empty structs. (#2849)
This removes special-casing of empty structs, handling them as just a regular value instead of a builtin. Note the `{} as Type` is still special-cased.

In lowering, removes the test of calling a function using `{}` because it's missing the proper load/store. This setup notices that error whereas the prior worked due to said special-casing. Fixing this will need to be done as part of generally adding loads for variable uses.
2023-05-26 10:33:17 -07:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 1d56e165ef Start refactoring type handling to track which types are in-use. (#2848)
This is the first step to refactoring types into a SemanticsTypeId. This only tracks what's in-use, but as a consequence starts funneling type information through in ways similar to how I'd want it to do SemanticsTypeId.
2023-05-26 10:16:38 -07:00
Jon Ross-Perkins e73207429f Adjust handling of values in calls and structs (#2824)
Previously, IR for arguments in calls and struct values was separated out. This merges it back in. Additionally, parameters for functions and struct types had their own IR; the block is still there, but there's a TODO to decide what to do with it.

In the LLVM IR, this has the consequence of emitting expressions that are inputs to a call or struct value within the scope of the function, which is pretty much where it should be. Importantly it happens before the call is encountered.

This change also tinkers with the int and real literal lowering. I'm pretty sure both are still wrong, but was having trouble figuring out a "better" way to do it, and this seems like it'll work for now.
2023-05-18 11:42:03 -07:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 77385aa344 Refactor semantics logic into separate files. (#2819)
This echoes #2818 and the philosophy is mostly covered there.

Versus parsing, semantics uses fewer separate handler files (for now) because the logic has been shorter. However, the design is still intended to make it easy to split files along boundaries similar to the parser, as I've done for a couple more complex/inter-related sections.
2023-05-15 14:45:16 -07:00