Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon Meow b87747306f Add the ability to pipe trace output to a file. (#1183)
Breaks `--trace` into two flags:

- `--parser_debug`, which sets the parser debug level (which I haven't dug into piping with `--trace`, but seemed likely to be troublesome)
- `--trace_file`, which now the type checker and interpreter will use for trace information (note compile errors should use a different channel)

Most of the file edits are just mechanical testdata flag updates: `sed -i 's/--trace/--parser_debug --trace_file=-/' testdata/**/*.carbon`

To explain the output paths:

- parse/compile errors: stderr
- print() calls: stdout
- parser tracing: `--parser_debug` option, stdout (formerly stdout if `--trace`)
- type check/compile tracing: `--trace_file=<file>`, giving `-` uses stdout (formerly stdout if `--trace`)
- return code of executed Carbon code: `--trace_file` if set, stdout if not (formerly stdout always)
2022-04-14 11:20:56 -07:00
Jon Meow 9009ae5e1b Cleanup up lit_test and require explicit tool paths (#1049)
I think lit_test accrued a bit of cruft as I switched approaches... I still may go further, but this is particularly fixing a bug where `FileCheck` (instead of `%{FileCheck}`) should've failed in tests.
2022-01-27 16:27:30 -08:00
Jon Meow beea60d0b8 Switch prelude to a file and refactor lit testing to pass commands directly. (#966) 2021-12-03 14:23:13 -08:00
Jon Meow 6d822ababb Rename main to Main for Carbon style consistency (#939)
Main() is more consistency with Carbon's naming guidelines. C# offers some precedent: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/program-structure/main-command-line
2021-11-02 14:53:18 -07:00
Geoff RomerandJon Meow c2140c6cb9 Check exhaustiveness of function-ending match statements (#882)
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-13 16:04:43 -07:00
Geoff RomerandJon Meow bc5a42211b Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)
I should emphasize that I am **completely cheating** here. This PR does not add support for actually _performing_  implicit conversions at run time, because the AST doesn't yet contain the necessary type information. At run time, code like `var p: Point = {.x = 1, .y = 2};` directly initializes the name `p` with the _struct_ value `{.x = 1, .y = 2}`; no object of type `Point` is actually created. I'm only getting away with this because we don't yet have any tests that can tell the difference.

Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00
Geoff Romer c4e40aaa86 Add support for struct types, following p0561. (#856) 2021-09-29 16:14:27 -07:00