5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth d037848a96 Replace hashtable ForEach callback with range-based iteration (#7806)
Replaces the callback-based `ForEach` methods on `RawHashtable`, `Map`,
and
`Set` with a range object supporting range-for loops, structured
bindings, and
the standard range concepts.

- Adds `.entries()` on `Map`, `Set`, and `RawHashtable`, returning a
range that
  models `std::ranges::forward_range` and `std::ranges::common_range`.
  Obtaining one is an explicit call rather than `begin()`/`end()` on the
container, as scanning a whole table is costly and shouldn't be hidden.
- Iterating a `Map` yields a `std::pair` of key and value references,
which
fits in two registers and is returned without being materialized in
memory.
- `Map::Range` and `Set::Range` are aliases of the raw hashtable's range
rather
than wrappers around it. The raw iterator produces the user-facing
reference
itself -- a `KeyT&` for a set, a pair of references for a map -- picked
by
`StorageEntry`, which is already specialized on whether there is a value
  type. That leaves one iterator to reason about instead of three.
- Deletes the rvalue `.entries()` overloads on the owning containers, as
a
  range built from a temporary table would dangle. Views don't own their
  storage, so the operation remains available on them.
- In release builds, the walk over the groups is a single induction
variable: a
  negative byte offset counting up to zero, anchored at the ends of the
metadata and entry arrays. Both arrays are then reached by indexed
addressing
off a base that stays put, and the entry pointer is formed only once a
group
  with a present entry has been found.
- In debug builds, the range hashes the table's metadata when it is
built and
re-checks that hash when it is destroyed, catching mutation of the table
while a range is live. It also picks a random starting group and a
random odd
group stride, which varies the traversal order between ranges while
still
visiting every group exactly once. That entropy is drawn when the range
is
built rather than in `begin()`, so `begin()` stays a pure function of
the
  range and the multi-pass guarantee holds.
- Removes `ForEachEntry` and all of its callers.

Measured against the iteration benchmark added in its own commit, a
traversal is at or ahead of what the callback compiled to across nearly
the
whole size range. The largest tables spend 3-5% fewer cycles, small
`Set`s as
much as 24% fewer, and instruction counts stay within about 1%. What
remains
behind is a handful of mid-sized `Map`s by up to 1%, and `Set` at 65536,
which
sits at exactly half its load factor, by 2%.

Both revisions were built with `-c opt --copt=-march=x86-64-v3` and
compared
with:

```
./scripts/bench_runner.py --exp_benchmark=... --base_benchmark=... \
    --benchmark_args=--benchmark_perf_counters=INSTRUCTIONS,CYCLES \
    --benchmark_args='--benchmark_filter=(Set|Map)Iterate<(Set|Map)<' \
    --extra_metrics_filter='(INSTRUCTIONS|CYCLES)'
```

Trimmed below to the primary integer configurations and to the two
counters;
the pointer- and string-keyed configurations follow the same pattern.

```
 Benchmark                             ┃           CYCLES            ┃        INSTRUCTIONS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/1....... │ 👍  -6.032%      p=1.14e-05 │      ??          p=0.752
                             baseline: │     12.06      ±   1.520%   │     64         ±   3.125%
                           experiment: │     11.33      ±   2.765%   │     65.5       ±   3.817%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/2....... │      ??          p=0.155    │      ??          p=0.343
                             baseline: │      7.587     ±   1.285%   │     41         ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      7.652     ±   0.865%   │     41         ±   2.439%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/3....... │      ??          p=0.343    │ 👍  -1.020%      p=0.0039
                             baseline: │      6.663     ±   4.260%   │     32.67      ±   2.041%
                           experiment: │      6.368     ±  12.224%   │     32.33      ±   2.062%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/4....... │      ??          p=0.343    │ 👍  -1.786%      p=0.0297
                             baseline: │      6.091     ±  15.470%   │     28         ±   3.571%
                           experiment: │      5.957     ±   8.932%   │     27.5       ±   3.636%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/8....... │      ??          p=0.323    │ 👍  -1.220%      p=0.000148
                             baseline: │      4.845     ±   0.800%   │     20.5       ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.814     ±   3.585%   │     20.25      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/16...... │ 👍  -2.195%      p=0.00908  │ 👍   0.769%      p=6.58e-06
                             baseline: │      4.312     ±   0.187%   │     16.25      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.218     ±   2.368%   │     16.13      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/32...... │      ??          p=0.236    │ 👍   0.442%      p=9.53e-06
                             baseline: │      4.051     ±   1.084%   │     14.13      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.063     ±   0.737%   │     14.06      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/64...... │      ??          p=0.693    │ 👎   0.227%      p=4.52e-06
                             baseline: │      4.021     ±   0.239%   │     13.75      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.019     ±   0.417%   │     13.78      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/256..... │ 👍   0.360%      p=0.00119  │ 👎   0.754%      p=1.37e-05
                             baseline: │      3.996     ±   0.173%   │     13.47      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      3.982     ±   0.272%   │     13.57      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/4096.... │ 👍   0.581%      p=1.96e-05 │ 👎   0.923%      p=1.96e-05
                             baseline: │      4.005     ±   0.816%   │     13.38      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      3.981     ±   0.192%   │     13.5       ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/65536... │ 👍  -4.957%      p=1.14e-05 │ 👎   0.934%      p=1.14e-05
                             baseline: │      5.307     ±   0.501%   │     13.38      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      5.044     ±   1.746%   │     13.5       ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/1048576. │ 👍  -3.947%      p=9.09e-05 │ 👎   0.935%      p=3.3e-05
                             baseline: │      6.074     ±   0.807%   │     13.38      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      5.834     ±   2.159%   │     13.5       ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/16777216 │      ??          p=0.155    │ 👎   0.935%      p=2.11e-05
                             baseline: │      5.082     ±   3.650%   │     13.38      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      5.012     ±   1.316%   │     13.5       ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/56...... │ 👎   0.825%      p=0.0268   │ 👍   0.270%      p=1.14e-05
                             baseline: │      3.918     ±   0.501%   │     13.21      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      3.951     ±   0.342%   │     13.18      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/224..... │ 👎   0.788%      p=0.000504 │ 👎   0.346%      p=1.64e-05
                             baseline: │      3.895     ±   0.111%   │     12.89      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      3.926     ±   0.285%   │     12.94      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/3584.... │ 👎   1.028%      p=0.000148 │ 👎   0.545%      p=1.14e-05
                             baseline: │      3.913     ±   0.427%   │     12.79      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      3.954     ±   0.325%   │     12.86      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/57344... │      ??          p=0.236    │ 👎   0.558%      p=2.55e-06
                             baseline: │      4.574     ±   0.721%   │     12.79      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.51      ±   3.709%   │     12.86      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/917504.. │ 👍  -3.826%      p=6.58e-06 │ 👎   0.559%      p=2.33e-05
                             baseline: │      5.221     ±   0.507%   │     12.79      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      5.021     ±   0.556%   │     12.86      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │
 BM_MapIterate<Map<int, int>>/14680064 │ 👍  -3.839%      p=1.37e-05 │ 👎   0.559%      p=3.31e-05
                             baseline: │      5.129     ±   1.194%   │     12.79      ±   0.000%
                           experiment: │      4.932     ±   1.475%   │     12.86      ±   0.000%
                                       │                             │

 Benchmark                        ┃           CYCLES            ┃        INSTRUCTIONS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/1....... │ 👍  -3.104%      p=0.000583 │      ??          p=0.206
                        baseline: │     11.2       ±   6.323%   │     60         ±   3.333%
                      experiment: │     10.85      ±   5.820%   │     61         ±   3.279%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/2....... │ 👍  -7.037%      p=0.0362   │      ??          p=0.155
                        baseline: │      7.086     ±  16.857%   │     37         ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      6.587     ±   0.479%   │     36         ±   4.167%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/3....... │ 👎   1.400%      p=2.34e-05 │ 👍  -1.163%      p=0.00136
                        baseline: │      5.363     ±   0.463%   │     28.67      ±   2.326%
                      experiment: │      5.438     ±  32.763%   │     28.33      ±   1.176%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/4....... │      ??          p=0.968    │      ??          p=0.286
                        baseline: │      4.642     ±  32.751%   │     23.5       ±   2.128%
                      experiment: │      4.658     ±  38.416%   │     23.63      ±   3.704%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/8....... │ 👍 -23.823%      p=3.74e-06 │ 👍  -1.515%      p=5.52e-05
                        baseline: │      4.701     ±   6.589%   │     16.5       ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      3.581     ±   7.790%   │     16.25      ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/16...... │ 👍  -4.502%      p=1.37e-05 │ 👍  -1.020%      p=3.31e-05
                        baseline: │      3.124     ±   0.585%   │     12.25      ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.983     ±   0.625%   │     12.13      ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/32...... │ 👍  -4.032%      p=5.46e-06 │ 👍   0.617%      p=1.96e-05
                        baseline: │      2.957     ±   0.260%   │     10.13      ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.838     ±   0.434%   │     10.06      ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/64...... │ 👍  -5.054%      p=4.52e-06 │ 👎   0.321%      p=1.37e-05
                        baseline: │      2.937     ±   0.301%   │      9.75      ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.788     ±   1.143%   │      9.781     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/256..... │ 👍  -5.325%      p=1.14e-05 │ 👎   1.073%      p=6.58e-06
                        baseline: │      2.916     ±   0.220%   │      9.469     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.761     ±   0.142%   │      9.57      ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/4096.... │ 👍  -4.865%      p=4.52e-06 │ 👎   1.317%      p=2.34e-05
                        baseline: │      2.921     ±   0.194%   │      9.381     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.779     ±   0.224%   │      9.504     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/65536... │ 👎   1.961%      p=3.93e-05 │ 👎   1.332%      p=1.49e-05
                        baseline: │      4.015     ±   0.482%   │      9.375     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      4.094     ±   0.613%   │      9.5       ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/1048576. │ 👍  -4.843%      p=1.14e-05 │ 👎   1.333%      p=5.38e-06
                        baseline: │      5.239     ±   0.144%   │      9.375     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      4.986     ±   0.139%   │      9.5       ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/16777216 │ 👍   0.840%      p=0.0362   │ 👎   1.333%      p=2.52e-06
                        baseline: │      3.719     ±   1.420%   │      9.375     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      3.688     ±   1.308%   │      9.5       ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/56...... │ 👍  -2.857%      p=9.53e-06 │ 👍   0.388%      p=3.31e-05
                        baseline: │      2.942     ±   0.439%   │      9.214     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.858     ±   0.619%   │      9.179     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/224..... │ 👍  -2.161%      p=2.34e-05 │ 👎   0.502%      p=4.52e-06
                        baseline: │      2.888     ±   0.347%   │      8.893     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.826     ±   0.450%   │      8.938     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/3584.... │ 👍  -1.750%      p=6.58e-06 │ 👎   0.793%      p=2.34e-05
                        baseline: │      2.89      ±   0.261%   │      8.792     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      2.84      ±   0.411%   │      8.862     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/57344... │      ??          p=0.502    │ 👎   0.812%      p=2.78e-05
                        baseline: │      3.684     ±   4.246%   │      8.786     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      3.644     ±   4.431%   │      8.857     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/917504.. │ 👍  -2.629%      p=0.000148 │ 👎   0.813%      p=3.08e-06
                        baseline: │      4.372     ±   0.693%   │      8.786     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      4.257     ±   0.210%   │      8.857     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
 BM_SetIterate<Set<int>>/14680064 │ 👍  -2.927%      p=0.0219   │ 👎   0.813%      p=3.03e-06
                        baseline: │      4.154     ±   3.286%   │      8.786     ±   0.000%
                      experiment: │      4.032     ±   3.198%   │      8.857     ±   0.000%
                                  │                             │
```

Assisted-by: Antigravity with Opus
2026-09-18 20:19:46 +00:00
Chandler Carruthandjosh11b 383cfbb023 Fix uniform identifier generation for lengths over 64 (#7459)
`GetIdentifiersImpl` unconditionally sliced the 64-entry
`IdentifierLengthCounts` table even for uniform distributions, which the
API documents as having no `max_length` limit. Requesting a uniform
distribution with `max_length > 64` therefore tripped an out-of-bounds
slice assertion. Only compute the table slice on the non-uniform path,
where `max_length <= 64` is already enforced.

Add `IdentifierByteSumStableAcrossSeeds`, which exercises this path (a
uniform request up to length 200) and checks the core invariant that the
total identifier byte count is independent of the random seed across a
spread of parameters.

Assisted-by: Claude Code

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-07 06:52:57 +00:00
Chandler Carruthandjosh11b 7871237c15 Move self to the explicit () parameter list (proposal #7016) (#7272)
Implements proposal #7016: `self` moves from the deduced implicit list
(`fn F[self: Self]()`) to the front of the explicit list. Its type may
be written explicitly (`fn F(self: Self)`) or omitted, in which case it
defaults to `Self` (`fn F(self)`, `fn F(ref self)`); `self` in the
implicit list is rejected.

Throughout checking, `self` is modeled as the first explicit parameter.
Because a method is just a function whose first parameter is `self`, it
can also be called as an ordinary function with the receiver passed
explicitly (`Type.M(obj, ...)`), not only as `obj.M(...)`. A new
`SemIR::CallArgParamPatterns` helper chooses the parameters matched
against the explicit arguments, excluding a leading `self` only when it
is supplied as a method-call receiver; arity checking, conversion, and
generic deduction use it. The resulting SemIR and lowering are
unchanged: `self` is still `call_param0`, and witnesses, thunks, and
vtables are unaffected.

An omitted `self` type is parsed as a `SelfBindingPattern` node with no
type expression; checking synthesizes the `Self` type so it behaves
exactly like `self: Self`. However, the exact spelling used must match
between a forward declaration and a definition, following #3763's rules
around declaration matching.

Generated functions, thunks, and C++ interop import/export build `self`
as the first explicit parameter, and the `self`-type override (e.g.
Derived->Base for a virtual override) applies to the explicit `self`.
Placement is validated by new diagnostics: `SelfInImplicitParamList`,
`SelfNotFirstParam`, and `SelfOutsideParamList`. The benchmark source
generator and the documentation adopt the `(self)` shorthand; the
prelude, the examples, and the test data are migrated in the following
commits.

Assisted-by: Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.7

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-10 15:30:43 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 22d09f7f25 Add C++ compile benchmarking (#7220)
We had source generation support for some time, but needed to get all
the runtimes set up correctly so that standard library headers are
available. Now that this is in place, we can benchmark both languages.

Also fixes a bug in the C++ source generation causing compile failures.

Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
2026-05-18 23:31:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth e041afd98d Centralize benchmarking infrastructure and the toolchain-wide benchmarks (#7212)
The benchmarks themselves aren't really specific to `driver`.

Keeping the source generation near to the primary use case of
benchmarking also seems like a more discoverable location.

I feel a little bad doing this reorganization right after I gave a talk
with links to a bunch of this code, but seems good to reorganize a bit
before doing some work to extend things now that we have full standard
library support for C++ benchmarking and other improvements.

Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
2026-05-15 20:17:23 +00:00