Remove 'no room' idiom (#1852)

Per discussion, this is confusing some people who read it as "don't allow" rather than "no need". I think "no need" is the original intent.
This commit is contained in:
Jon Ross-Perkins
2022-08-01 11:23:10 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 92748e6b35
commit eac7aecd86
+3 -3
View File
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ that performance, whether good or bad, is unsurprising to developers. Even
pleasant surprises, when too frequent, can become a problem due to establishing
brittle baseline performance that cannot be reliably sustained.
**Leave no room for a lower level language.** Developers should not need to
leave the rules and structure of Carbon, whether to gain control over
performance problems or to gain access to hardware facilities.
**No need for a lower level language.** Developers should not need to leave the
rules and structure of Carbon, whether to gain control over performance problems
or to gain access to hardware facilities.
### Software and language evolution