mirror of
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git
synced 2026-09-25 14:10:11 +01:00
Be more explicit about AST types (#921)
This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins. There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax. Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ void Statement::PrintDepth(int depth, llvm::raw_ostream& out) const {
|
||||
case Kind::If: {
|
||||
const auto& if_stmt = cast<If>(*this);
|
||||
out << "if (" << if_stmt.condition() << ")\n";
|
||||
if_stmt.then_statement().PrintDepth(depth - 1, out);
|
||||
if (if_stmt.else_statement()) {
|
||||
if_stmt.then_block().PrintDepth(depth - 1, out);
|
||||
if (if_stmt.else_block()) {
|
||||
out << "\nelse\n";
|
||||
(*if_stmt.else_statement())->PrintDepth(depth - 1, out);
|
||||
(*if_stmt.else_block())->PrintDepth(depth - 1, out);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ void Statement::PrintDepth(int depth, llvm::raw_ostream& out) const {
|
||||
if (depth < 0 || depth > 1) {
|
||||
out << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (block.statement()) {
|
||||
(*block.statement())->PrintDepth(depth, out);
|
||||
if (block.sequence()) {
|
||||
(*block.sequence())->PrintDepth(depth, out);
|
||||
if (depth < 0 || depth > 1) {
|
||||
out << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user