Move diagnostics into a namespace (#5173)

What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.

Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:

- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".

[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).

I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.

toolchain/parse/tree_and_subtrees.cpp

@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ auto TreeAndSubtrees::GetSubtreeTokenRange(NodeId node_id) const -> TokenRange {
 }
 
 auto TreeAndSubtrees::NodeToDiagnosticLoc(NodeId node_id, bool token_only) const
-    -> ConvertedDiagnosticLoc {
+    -> Diagnostics::ConvertedLoc {
   // Support the invalid token as a way to emit only the filename, when there
   // is no line association.
   if (!node_id.has_value()) {