Id::Invalid -> Id::None (#4834)

High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.

Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).

I've tried to sequence commits here:

1. Automatic replacements:

- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
  - `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
  - `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
  - `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
  - `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`

2. Manual edits:

  - In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
    - `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
    - Manual edits to comments in this file.
  - `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
  - In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
    - `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
    - Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
    - Various mentions of "valid" in comments
  - In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
  - Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.

3. Autoupdate tests

4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)

5. Comment spot checks

Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.

toolchain/parse/handle_decl_scope_loop.cpp

@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static auto TryHandleAsDecl(Context& context, Context::StateStackEntry state,
       // Misplaced packaging keywords may lead to this being re-triggered.
       if (context.packaging_state() !=
           Context::PackagingState::AfterNonPackagingDecl) {
-        if (!context.first_non_packaging_token().is_valid()) {
+        if (!context.first_non_packaging_token().has_value()) {
           context.set_first_non_packaging_token(*context.position());
         }
         context.set_packaging_state(