Add Self to the name scope for a class. (#3736)

Rather than just adding `Self` to the lexical scope, add it to the
class's name scope so that it is visible in later lexical scopes for the
same class -- in particular, for out-of-line definitions of members.
Also switch some tests in `check/testdata/class` over to making
idiomatic use of `Self` both inside a class and out-of-line, now that it
works more consistently.

Note that this does not permit using `Class.Self`, but only because we
don't yet support keyword names after `.` at all. If that changed, one
could use `Class.Self` to redundantly refer to `Class`. Whether we allow
that is left to a future decision.
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith
2024-02-29 21:33:47 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent a6f4752a7b
commit 67d5446b03
81 changed files with 535 additions and 193 deletions
+2
View File
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ fn MakeOuter() -> Outer {
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.loc9: <unbound element of class Inner> = field_decl b, element1 [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: !members:
// CHECK:STDOUT: .Self = constants.%Inner
// CHECK:STDOUT: .a = %.loc8
// CHECK:STDOUT: .b = %.loc9
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ fn MakeOuter() -> Outer {
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.loc16: <unbound element of class Outer> = field_decl d, element1 [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: !members:
// CHECK:STDOUT: .Self = constants.%Outer
// CHECK:STDOUT: .c = %.loc15
// CHECK:STDOUT: .d = %.loc16
// CHECK:STDOUT: }