mirror of
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git
synced 2026-10-03 17:55:50 +01:00
Rename "generic instance" to "specific" throughout the toolchain. (#4165)
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ auto ScopeStack::VerifyOnFinish() -> void {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto ScopeStack::Push(SemIR::InstId scope_inst_id, SemIR::NameScopeId scope_id,
|
||||
SemIR::GenericInstanceId instance_id,
|
||||
SemIR::SpecificId specific_id,
|
||||
bool lexical_lookup_has_load_error) -> void {
|
||||
// If this scope doesn't have a specific of its own, it lives in the enclosing
|
||||
// scope's specific, if any.
|
||||
auto enclosing_instance_id = instance_id;
|
||||
if (!instance_id.is_valid() && !scope_stack_.empty()) {
|
||||
enclosing_instance_id = PeekSpecificId();
|
||||
auto enclosing_specific_id = specific_id;
|
||||
if (!specific_id.is_valid() && !scope_stack_.empty()) {
|
||||
enclosing_specific_id = PeekSpecificId();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
compile_time_binding_stack_.PushArray();
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ auto ScopeStack::Push(SemIR::InstId scope_inst_id, SemIR::NameScopeId scope_id,
|
||||
{.index = next_scope_index_,
|
||||
.scope_inst_id = scope_inst_id,
|
||||
.scope_id = scope_id,
|
||||
.instance_id = enclosing_instance_id,
|
||||
.specific_id = enclosing_specific_id,
|
||||
.next_compile_time_bind_index = SemIR::CompileTimeBindIndex(
|
||||
compile_time_binding_stack_.all_values_size()),
|
||||
.lexical_lookup_has_load_error =
|
||||
@@ -36,13 +36,13 @@ auto ScopeStack::Push(SemIR::InstId scope_inst_id, SemIR::NameScopeId scope_id,
|
||||
if (scope_id.is_valid()) {
|
||||
non_lexical_scope_stack_.push_back({.scope_index = next_scope_index_,
|
||||
.name_scope_id = scope_id,
|
||||
.instance_id = enclosing_instance_id});
|
||||
.specific_id = enclosing_specific_id});
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// For lexical lookups, unqualified lookup doesn't know how to find the
|
||||
// associated generic instance, so if we start adding lexical scopes with
|
||||
// generic instances, we'll need to somehow track them in lookup.
|
||||
CARBON_CHECK(!instance_id.is_valid())
|
||||
<< "Lexical scope should not have an associated generic instance.";
|
||||
// associated specific, so if we start adding lexical scopes associated with
|
||||
// specifics, we'll need to somehow track them in lookup.
|
||||
CARBON_CHECK(!specific_id.is_valid())
|
||||
<< "Lexical scope should not have an associated specific.";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Handle this case more gracefully.
|
||||
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ auto ScopeStack::Restore(SuspendedScope scope) -> void {
|
||||
non_lexical_scope_stack_.push_back(
|
||||
{.scope_index = scope.entry.index,
|
||||
.name_scope_id = scope.entry.scope_id,
|
||||
.instance_id = scope.entry.instance_id});
|
||||
.specific_id = scope.entry.specific_id});
|
||||
}
|
||||
scope_stack_.push_back(std::move(scope.entry));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user