From 35eb25c2793e919b1be5cd6c3d2d9a04c9cdf785 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 18:43:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Use `CXXRecordDecl` for consistency (#7891)

`CXXRecordDecl` and `RecordDecl` are functionally interchangeable in our
context, and other than here we only use `RecordDecl` when APIs outside
our control force us to.
---
 toolchain/check/cpp/export.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/toolchain/check/cpp/export.cpp b/toolchain/check/cpp/export.cpp
index 41fce49d76e6..81a021c6449e 100644
--- a/toolchain/check/cpp/export.cpp
+++ b/toolchain/check/cpp/export.cpp
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ auto ExportNameScopeToCpp(Context& context, SemIR::LocId loc_id,
 
     // Complete the type here to avoid hitting a clang assert later when
     // adding methods.
-    if (auto* record_decl = llvm::dyn_cast<clang::RecordDecl>(decl_context)) {
+    if (auto* record_decl =
+            llvm::dyn_cast<clang::CXXRecordDecl>(decl_context)) {
       context.ast_context().getExternalSource()->CompleteType(record_decl);
     }
   }