From 2c198865ff536b6f461f0cd01bcb27f27ca1edcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chandler Carruth Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:17:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Mark some other issue categories as not-stale. (#2496) While we have a generic 'long term' label, it seems redundant for some issues that are already labeled with something that clearly is open-ended and not something we should expect to have a bounded timeline. For example, we want to actively curate a backlog of design ideas and good first issues for folks to browse and pick up, so we shouldn't be marking them as inactive after any fixed time frame. --- .github/workflows/stale.yaml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/stale.yaml b/.github/workflows/stale.yaml index a0df19c23409..1eb57ea47c95 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/stale.yaml +++ b/.github/workflows/stale.yaml @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ jobs: activity in the 14 days since the `inactive` label was added. stale-issue-label: 'inactive' stale-pr-label: 'inactive' - exempt-issue-labels: 'long term' + exempt-issue-labels: + 'long term,design idea,design update,good first issue' days-before-stale: 90 days-before-close: 14 days-before-issue-close: -1