Optimize runs of horizontal whitespace. (#3288)

So, this is a somewhat fun, simple improvement. =] Just use a loop and
count runs of whitespace. I didn't even work all that hard to make the
loop fast, but it seems great. Makes long runs of indentation more than
2x faster at basically no code complexity.

I thought about doing this for vertical whitespace as well but it's not
easy to do, and didn't seem worth adding complexity. Huge runs of blank
lines aren't nearly as common as lots of indentation. I do have a plan
for an analogous optimization for comment blocks, but want to simplify
some other code first.

We could also make this (hilariously) faster with some judicious use of
SIMD or clever use of a string function, but it doesn't seem worth it
given how fast the simple loop is already.

I didn't work to get a high N count and so there's plenty of noise here,
but the benchmark data speaks for itself:

```
BM_ValidKeywords                               2.71ms ± 1%  2.75ms ± 1%   +1.32%  (p=0.016 n=5+5)
BM_ValidIdentifiers<1, 64, false>              9.71ms ± 2%  9.74ms ± 1%     ~     (p=1.000 n=5+5)
BM_ValidIdentifiers<1, 1, true>                3.17ms ± 1%  3.22ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.151 n=5+5)
BM_ValidIdentifiers<3, 5, true>                11.5ms ± 2%  11.6ms ± 3%     ~     (p=0.548 n=5+5)
BM_ValidIdentifiers<3, 16, true>               11.3ms ± 3%  11.6ms ± 3%     ~     (p=0.095 n=5+5)
BM_ValidIdentifiers<12, 64, true>              12.8ms ± 1%  12.8ms ± 1%     ~     (p=1.000 n=5+5)
BM_HorizontalWhitespace/1                      11.6ms ± 1%  11.7ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_HorizontalWhitespace/4                      12.9ms ± 1%  11.8ms ± 0%   -8.50%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_HorizontalWhitespace/16                     17.3ms ± 4%  12.5ms ± 1%  -27.69%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_HorizontalWhitespace/64                     28.9ms ± 3%  16.0ms ± 2%  -44.88%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_HorizontalWhitespace/128                    47.6ms ± 3%  21.0ms ± 0%  -55.88%  (p=0.016 n=5+4)
BM_RandomSource                                7.92ms ± 1%  7.70ms ± 3%   -2.74%  (p=0.016 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/1/0/0                       5.92ms ± 2%  5.86ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/2/0/0                       5.30ms ± 1%  5.01ms ± 1%   -5.52%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/3/0/0                       4.48ms ± 0%  3.95ms ± 1%  -11.69%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/4/0/0                       4.61ms ± 1%  3.73ms ± 1%  -19.12%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/8/0/0                       5.34ms ± 6%  3.05ms ± 1%  -42.82%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/16/0/0                      6.44ms ± 1%  3.20ms ± 2%  -50.24%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/0/0                      10.3ms ± 5%   4.2ms ± 1%  -59.81%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/1/0                       5.17ms ± 2%  5.17ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/2/0                       4.04ms ± 1%  4.04ms ± 2%     ~     (p=1.000 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/3/0                       2.89ms ± 1%  2.89ms ± 1%     ~     (p=1.000 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/4/0                       2.54ms ± 1%  2.55ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.421 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/8/0                       1.65ms ± 2%  1.67ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/16/0                      1.18ms ± 1%  1.19ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.222 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/32/0                       948µs ± 1%   957µs ± 2%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/1                       5.17ms ± 1%  5.16ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.841 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/2                       4.03ms ± 2%  4.04ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.548 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/3                       2.89ms ± 1%  2.88ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.841 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/4                       2.54ms ± 1%  2.54ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.548 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/8                       1.66ms ± 3%  1.67ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/16                      1.19ms ± 1%  1.18ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.548 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/0/0/32                       949µs ± 2%   955µs ± 1%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/1/0                      10.0ms ± 1%   4.0ms ± 1%  -59.76%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/2/0                      9.73ms ± 2%  3.92ms ± 2%  -59.73%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/3/0                      9.40ms ± 2%  3.84ms ± 3%  -59.10%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/4/0                      9.20ms ± 2%  3.74ms ± 1%  -59.35%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/8/0                      8.38ms ± 2%  3.50ms ± 1%  -58.22%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/16/0                     7.18ms ± 2%  3.06ms ± 3%  -57.41%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/0                     5.53ms ± 1%  2.44ms ± 2%  -55.99%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/1                     5.47ms ± 2%  2.40ms ± 2%  -56.08%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/2                     5.41ms ± 3%  2.40ms ± 2%  -55.66%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/3                     5.28ms ± 2%  2.37ms ± 2%  -55.18%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/4                     5.25ms ± 2%  2.34ms ± 2%  -55.52%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/8                     5.03ms ± 3%  2.25ms ± 1%  -55.29%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/16                    4.62ms ± 1%  2.15ms ± 3%  -53.41%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_GroupingSymbols/32/32/32                    3.99ms ± 1%  1.86ms ± 1%  -53.24%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_BlankLines/1                                12.8ms ± 1%  12.6ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_BlankLines/4                                16.0ms ± 3%  15.8ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_BlankLines/16                               33.1ms ± 2%  32.1ms ± 1%   -3.29%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_BlankLines/64                               84.6ms ± 3%  84.2ms ± 3%     ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)
BM_BlankLines/128                               159ms ± 4%   155ms ± 3%     ~     (p=0.310 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/0/0                          14.5ms ± 2%  14.5ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.690 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/0/0                          19.0ms ± 1%  19.0ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.548 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/0/0                         188ms ± 2%   186ms ± 1%     ~     (p=0.151 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/30/0                         14.8ms ± 3%  14.7ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.421 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/30/0                         21.8ms ± 1%  21.3ms ± 4%     ~     (p=0.095 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/30/0                        201ms ± 1%   200ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.421 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/70/0                         15.5ms ± 3%  15.2ms ± 4%     ~     (p=0.095 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/70/0                         23.2ms ± 1%  22.5ms ± 2%   -2.76%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/70/0                        213ms ± 1%   209ms ± 1%   -1.54%  (p=0.016 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/0/2                          15.3ms ± 1%  14.5ms ± 1%   -4.99%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/0/2                          21.4ms ± 1%  20.2ms ± 2%   -5.48%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/0/2                         242ms ± 2%   218ms ± 5%  -10.13%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/30/2                         15.7ms ± 4%  15.1ms ± 2%   -3.37%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/30/2                         24.3ms ± 1%  22.5ms ± 3%   -7.42%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/30/2                        268ms ± 2%   240ms ± 3%  -10.22%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/70/2                         16.1ms ± 2%  15.3ms ± 3%   -5.24%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/70/2                         25.7ms ± 3%  24.0ms ± 3%   -6.69%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/70/2                        272ms ± 1%   247ms ± 1%   -9.21%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/0/8                          17.2ms ± 5%  14.8ms ± 2%  -14.32%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/0/8                          30.4ms ± 2%  20.8ms ± 2%  -31.47%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/0/8                         463ms ± 1%   260ms ± 1%  -43.89%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/30/8                         17.2ms ± 2%  15.2ms ± 2%  -12.01%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/30/8                         32.4ms ± 1%  23.2ms ± 3%  -28.61%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/30/8                        498ms ± 3%   287ms ± 2%  -42.32%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/1/70/8                         17.6ms ± 2%  15.5ms ± 3%  -11.61%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/4/70/8                         34.0ms ± 4%  24.7ms ± 3%  -27.31%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
BM_CommentLines/128/70/8                        497ms ± 2%   297ms ± 4%  -40.29%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
```

Stacked on top of #3287 -- only the last commit should be reviewed here.
This commit is contained in:
Chandler Carruth
2023-10-13 05:11:04 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 870ccf3eac
commit 0e2b6c7f1a
+12 -2
View File
@@ -300,8 +300,18 @@ class [[clang::internal_linkage]] TokenizedBuffer::Lexer {
auto LexHorizontalWhitespace(llvm::StringRef& source_text) -> void {
CARBON_DCHECK(source_text.front() == ' ' || source_text.front() == '\t');
NoteWhitespace();
++current_column_;
source_text = source_text.drop_front();
// Handle adjacent whitespace quickly. This comes up frequently for example
// due to indentation. We don't expect *huge* runs, so just use a scalar
// loop. While still scalar, this avoids repeated table dispatch and marking
// whitespace. We use `ssize_t` in the loop for performance.
ssize_t ws_count = 1;
ssize_t size = source_text.size();
while (ws_count < size &&
(source_text[ws_count] == ' ' || source_text[ws_count] == '\t')) {
++ws_count;
}
current_column_ += ws_count;
source_text = source_text.drop_front(ws_count);
}
auto LexVerticalWhitespace(llvm::StringRef& source_text) -> void {